不含双酚 A 的牙科树脂复合材料的机械和抗菌性能比较研究。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2024.06.024
{"title":"不含双酚 A 的牙科树脂复合材料的机械和抗菌性能比较研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dental.2024.06.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The commonly used base monomer utilized in resinous commercial dental restorative products is bis-GMA which is derived from bisphenol-A (BPA) - a well-known compound which may disrupt endocrine functions. To address concerns about its leaching into the oral environment and to optimize the quality of dental composites, a BPA-free alternative base monomer, fluorinated urethane dimethacrylate (FUDMA), was designed by modifying a UDMA monomer system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nine groups of composites were prepared by mixing the base monomers and TEGDMA in a ratio of 70/30 wt% to which were added silanized glass particles (mean diameter: 0.7 µm) in 3 different volume fractions (40, 45, and 50 vol%). Bis-GMA and UDMA base monomers were used as control groups in the same ratios. Various properties including degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM), water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), surface hardness and roughness, and initial adhesion property against <em>S.mutans</em> were investigated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni test at α = 0.05 was used to analyze the results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant difference in FS between FUDMA-based composite with 40 vol% filler (120.3 ± 10.4 MPa) and Bis-GMA-based composite with the same filler fraction (105.8 ± 10.0 MPa) was observed but there was no significant difference among other groups. The UDMA based group exhibited the highest WS (1.3 ± 0.3 %). Bis-GMA showed greater initial bacterial adhesion but was not statistically different from the other groups (p = 0.082).</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>FUDMA-based resin composites exhibit comparable mechanical and bacterial adhesion properties compared with Bis-GMA and UDMA-based composites. The FUDMA composites show positive outcomes indicating they could be used as substitute composites to Bis-GMA-based composites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":298,"journal":{"name":"Dental Materials","volume":"40 8","pages":"Pages e31-e39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of BPA-free dental resin composites\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dental.2024.06.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The commonly used base monomer utilized in resinous commercial dental restorative products is bis-GMA which is derived from bisphenol-A (BPA) - a well-known compound which may disrupt endocrine functions. To address concerns about its leaching into the oral environment and to optimize the quality of dental composites, a BPA-free alternative base monomer, fluorinated urethane dimethacrylate (FUDMA), was designed by modifying a UDMA monomer system.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nine groups of composites were prepared by mixing the base monomers and TEGDMA in a ratio of 70/30 wt% to which were added silanized glass particles (mean diameter: 0.7 µm) in 3 different volume fractions (40, 45, and 50 vol%). Bis-GMA and UDMA base monomers were used as control groups in the same ratios. Various properties including degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM), water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), surface hardness and roughness, and initial adhesion property against <em>S.mutans</em> were investigated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni test at α = 0.05 was used to analyze the results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A significant difference in FS between FUDMA-based composite with 40 vol% filler (120.3 ± 10.4 MPa) and Bis-GMA-based composite with the same filler fraction (105.8 ± 10.0 MPa) was observed but there was no significant difference among other groups. The UDMA based group exhibited the highest WS (1.3 ± 0.3 %). Bis-GMA showed greater initial bacterial adhesion but was not statistically different from the other groups (p = 0.082).</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>FUDMA-based resin composites exhibit comparable mechanical and bacterial adhesion properties compared with Bis-GMA and UDMA-based composites. The FUDMA composites show positive outcomes indicating they could be used as substitute composites to Bis-GMA-based composites.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Materials\",\"volume\":\"40 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages e31-e39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124001842\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0109564124001842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:树脂类商业牙科修复产品中常用的基础单体是双-GMA,它是从双酚-A(BPA)中提取的,而双酚-A 是一种众所周知的可能干扰内分泌功能的化合物。为了消除人们对双酚 A 浸入口腔环境的担忧,并优化牙科复合材料的质量,我们通过改良 UDMA 单体体系,设计出了一种不含双酚 A 的替代基体单体--氟化聚氨酯二甲基丙烯酸酯 (FUDMA):方法:将基础单体和 TEGDMA 按 70/30 wt% 的比例混合,再加入硅烷化玻璃颗粒(平均直径:0.7 µm),以 3 种不同的体积分数(40、45 和 50vol%)制备出 9 组复合材料。双-GMA 和 UDMA 基础单体以相同的比例用作对照组。对各种特性进行了研究,包括转化率 (DC)、抗弯强度 (FS) 和抗弯模量 (FM)、吸水性 (WS)、溶解性 (SL)、表面硬度和粗糙度以及对 S.mutans 的初始粘附性。采用单因素方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验(α = 0.05)分析结果:结果表明,填充物含量为 40 Vol% 的 FUDMA 基复合材料的 FS 值(120.3 ± 10.4 MPa)与填充物含量相同的 Bis-GMA 基复合材料的 FS 值(105.8 ± 10.0 MPa)之间存在明显差异,但其他组间无明显差异。基于 UDMA 的复合材料组的 WS 值最高(1.3 ± 0.3 %)。Bis-GMA 显示出更大的初始细菌粘附性,但与其他组别相比没有统计学差异(p = 0.082):意义:与 Bis-GMA 和 UDMA 基复合材料相比,FUDMA 基树脂复合材料具有相似的机械性能和细菌粘附性能。FUDMA 复合材料显示出积极的结果,表明它们可用作双 GMA 基复合材料的替代复合材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of BPA-free dental resin composites

Objective

The commonly used base monomer utilized in resinous commercial dental restorative products is bis-GMA which is derived from bisphenol-A (BPA) - a well-known compound which may disrupt endocrine functions. To address concerns about its leaching into the oral environment and to optimize the quality of dental composites, a BPA-free alternative base monomer, fluorinated urethane dimethacrylate (FUDMA), was designed by modifying a UDMA monomer system.

Methods

Nine groups of composites were prepared by mixing the base monomers and TEGDMA in a ratio of 70/30 wt% to which were added silanized glass particles (mean diameter: 0.7 µm) in 3 different volume fractions (40, 45, and 50 vol%). Bis-GMA and UDMA base monomers were used as control groups in the same ratios. Various properties including degree of conversion (DC), flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM), water sorption (WS), solubility (SL), surface hardness and roughness, and initial adhesion property against S.mutans were investigated. One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni test at α = 0.05 was used to analyze the results.

Results

A significant difference in FS between FUDMA-based composite with 40 vol% filler (120.3 ± 10.4 MPa) and Bis-GMA-based composite with the same filler fraction (105.8 ± 10.0 MPa) was observed but there was no significant difference among other groups. The UDMA based group exhibited the highest WS (1.3 ± 0.3 %). Bis-GMA showed greater initial bacterial adhesion but was not statistically different from the other groups (p = 0.082).

Significance

FUDMA-based resin composites exhibit comparable mechanical and bacterial adhesion properties compared with Bis-GMA and UDMA-based composites. The FUDMA composites show positive outcomes indicating they could be used as substitute composites to Bis-GMA-based composites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dental Materials
Dental Materials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Dental Materials publishes original research, review articles, and short communications. Academy of Dental Materials members click here to register for free access to Dental Materials online. The principal aim of Dental Materials is to promote rapid communication of scientific information between academia, industry, and the dental practitioner. Original Manuscripts on clinical and laboratory research of basic and applied character which focus on the properties or performance of dental materials or the reaction of host tissues to materials are given priority publication. Other acceptable topics include application technology in clinical dentistry and dental laboratory technology. Comprehensive reviews and editorial commentaries on pertinent subjects will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Bonding neat hydrophobic-rich resins to etched dentin: A proof of concept. Models for shrinkage stress: C-factor and all that. Ability of a novel primer to enhance the polymerization of a self-cured resin composite. Classification and bibliometric analysis of hydrogels in periodontitis treatment: Trends, mechanisms, advantages, and future research directions. Microspheres of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth exhibit superior pulp regeneration capacity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1