一项生态学研究:在澳大利亚学校实际利用 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测进行面对面学习。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100159
Archana Koirala , Noni Winkler , Caroline Sharpe , Trish van Tussenbroek , Paul Wood , Kristine Macartney , Helen Quinn
{"title":"一项生态学研究:在澳大利亚学校实际利用 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测进行面对面学习。","authors":"Archana Koirala ,&nbsp;Noni Winkler ,&nbsp;Caroline Sharpe ,&nbsp;Trish van Tussenbroek ,&nbsp;Paul Wood ,&nbsp;Kristine Macartney ,&nbsp;Helen Quinn","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to describe the use of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing of COVID-19 contacts in New South Wales schools to determine return to in-person school attendance instead of home quarantine, between 6 November and 21 December 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>COVID-19 school contacts were required to quarantine for two weeks postexposure to the case. Students who opted into daily rapid antigen testing logged their results in a database, prior to school attendance, and obtained SARS-CoV-2 nucleic amplification acid testing on day 12–16. Secondary attack rates (SARs) in schools utilising rapid antigen testing (Test-to-Stay schools) and those not utilising rapid antigen testing (non–Test-to-Stay school) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 9,887 people in 293 schools who reported performing at least one rapid antigen test (RAT). The SAR in RAT schools was 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 2.7–4.1) and non-RAT schools was 2.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.4–3.3). A total of 30,535 school days were preserved through this program.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of RATs preserved in-person learning without a significant increase to SAR.</p></div><div><h3>Implication for public health</h3><p>Disruptions in face-to-face learning have long-term detrimental impacts on children and adolescents. Rapid antigen testing has been shown to be beneficial to maintain face-to-face learning in Australian schools and may be a useful method to safeguard from school disruptions in future pandemics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 3","pages":"Article 100159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000347/pdfft?md5=6d315ca2c1f1858057d4a38803bae961&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000347-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world utilisation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing to enable face-to-face learning in Australian schools, an ecological study\",\"authors\":\"Archana Koirala ,&nbsp;Noni Winkler ,&nbsp;Caroline Sharpe ,&nbsp;Trish van Tussenbroek ,&nbsp;Paul Wood ,&nbsp;Kristine Macartney ,&nbsp;Helen Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2024.100159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to describe the use of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing of COVID-19 contacts in New South Wales schools to determine return to in-person school attendance instead of home quarantine, between 6 November and 21 December 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>COVID-19 school contacts were required to quarantine for two weeks postexposure to the case. Students who opted into daily rapid antigen testing logged their results in a database, prior to school attendance, and obtained SARS-CoV-2 nucleic amplification acid testing on day 12–16. Secondary attack rates (SARs) in schools utilising rapid antigen testing (Test-to-Stay schools) and those not utilising rapid antigen testing (non–Test-to-Stay school) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 9,887 people in 293 schools who reported performing at least one rapid antigen test (RAT). The SAR in RAT schools was 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 2.7–4.1) and non-RAT schools was 2.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.4–3.3). A total of 30,535 school days were preserved through this program.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The use of RATs preserved in-person learning without a significant increase to SAR.</p></div><div><h3>Implication for public health</h3><p>Disruptions in face-to-face learning have long-term detrimental impacts on children and adolescents. Rapid antigen testing has been shown to be beneficial to maintain face-to-face learning in Australian schools and may be a useful method to safeguard from school disruptions in future pandemics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000347/pdfft?md5=6d315ca2c1f1858057d4a38803bae961&pid=1-s2.0-S1326020024000347-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000347\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020024000347","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是描述新南威尔士州学校对 COVID-19 接触者进行 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的使用情况,以确定在 2021 年 11 月 6 日至 12 月 21 日期间是否恢复亲自到校上课,而不是在家隔离:方法:COVID-19 学校接触者必须在接触病例后隔离两周。选择接受每日快速抗原检测的学生在入学前将检测结果登录数据库,并在第 12-16 天接受 SARS-CoV-2 核酸扩增检测。计算了使用快速抗原检测的学校(留校检测学校)和未使用快速抗原检测的学校(非留校检测学校)的二次发病率(SARs):我们确定了 293 所学校中的 9887 人,他们报告至少进行了一次快速抗原检测(RAT)。进行过快速抗原检测的学校的 SAR 为 3.4%(95% 置信区间:2.7-4.1),未进行快速抗原检测的学校为 2.8%(95% 置信区间:2.4-3.3)。通过该计划,共保留了 30,535 个学校日:结论:使用 "RATs "可保留面对面学习的时间,而不会显著增加学生的课业负担:对公共卫生的意义:面授学习的中断会对儿童和青少年产生长期的不利影响。事实证明,快速抗原检测有利于维持澳大利亚学校的面对面学习,可能是在未来流行病肆虐时防止学校中断学习的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world utilisation of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing to enable face-to-face learning in Australian schools, an ecological study

Objective

The objective of this study was to describe the use of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen testing of COVID-19 contacts in New South Wales schools to determine return to in-person school attendance instead of home quarantine, between 6 November and 21 December 2021.

Methods

COVID-19 school contacts were required to quarantine for two weeks postexposure to the case. Students who opted into daily rapid antigen testing logged their results in a database, prior to school attendance, and obtained SARS-CoV-2 nucleic amplification acid testing on day 12–16. Secondary attack rates (SARs) in schools utilising rapid antigen testing (Test-to-Stay schools) and those not utilising rapid antigen testing (non–Test-to-Stay school) were calculated.

Results

We identified 9,887 people in 293 schools who reported performing at least one rapid antigen test (RAT). The SAR in RAT schools was 3.4% (95% confidence interval: 2.7–4.1) and non-RAT schools was 2.8% (95% confidence interval: 2.4–3.3). A total of 30,535 school days were preserved through this program.

Conclusions

The use of RATs preserved in-person learning without a significant increase to SAR.

Implication for public health

Disruptions in face-to-face learning have long-term detrimental impacts on children and adolescents. Rapid antigen testing has been shown to be beneficial to maintain face-to-face learning in Australian schools and may be a useful method to safeguard from school disruptions in future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Taking a strengths-based approach to mental health in rural communities: A systematic literature review Preliminary evaluation of a novel Aboriginal community–controlled prison health service for First Nations people A cross-sectional study of the experiences of distressed callers when accessing financial assistance from a telephone-based cancer information and support service Increasing awareness of sexually transmitted infections (STI) testing and addressing stigma may improve STI testing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Evidence from the Next Generation Youth Wellbeing Study Psychedelic medicine and cultural responsiveness: A call for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement in Australian clinical trials and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1