前语言婴儿对核心社会目标的理解（或许还有核心道德）的证据。

IF 16.6 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X23003059

J Kiley Hamlin

{"title":"前语言婴儿对核心社会目标的理解（或许还有核心道德）的证据。","authors":"J Kiley Hamlin","doi":"10.1017/S0140525X23003059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spelke's What Babies Know masterfully describes infants' impressive repertoire of core cognitive concepts, from which the suite of human knowledge is eventually built. The current commentary argues for the existence of a core concept that Spelke claims preverbal infants lack: social goal. Core social goal concepts, operative extremely early in human development, underlie infants' basic abilities to interpret and evaluate entities within the moral world; such abilities support claims for a core moral domain.","PeriodicalId":8698,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for core social goal understanding (and, perhaps, core morality) in preverbal infants.\",\"authors\":\"J Kiley Hamlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0140525X23003059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spelke's What Babies Know masterfully describes infants' impressive repertoire of core cognitive concepts, from which the suite of human knowledge is eventually built. The current commentary argues for the existence of a core concept that Spelke claims preverbal infants lack: social goal. Core social goal concepts, operative extremely early in human development, underlie infants' basic abilities to interpret and evaluate entities within the moral world; such abilities support claims for a core moral domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and Brain Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and Brain Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23003059\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23003059","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

斯佩尔克的《婴儿知多少》（What Babies Know）一书精湛地描述了婴儿令人印象深刻的核心认知概念库，人类的知识体系最终就是从这些概念库中建立起来的。本评论论证了斯佩尔克所说的前语婴幼儿缺乏的核心概念：社会目标。核心社会目标概念在人类发展的极早期就已发挥作用，是婴儿解释和评价道德世界中实体的基本能力的基础；这种能力支持了核心道德领域的主张。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Evidence for core social goal understanding (and, perhaps, core morality) in preverbal infants.

Spelke's What Babies Know masterfully describes infants' impressive repertoire of core cognitive concepts, from which the suite of human knowledge is eventually built. The current commentary argues for the existence of a core concept that Spelke claims preverbal infants lack: social goal. Core social goal concepts, operative extremely early in human development, underlie infants' basic abilities to interpret and evaluate entities within the moral world; such abilities support claims for a core moral domain.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.

期刊最新文献

Bayes beyond the predictive distribution. Challenges of meta-learning and rational analysis in large worlds. Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition. Integrative learning in the lens of meta-learned models of cognition: Impacts on animal and human learning outcomes. Is human compositionality meta-learned?