[奶牛群酸碱状态不同监测方法的比较]。

IF 0.4 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2317-1359
Tanja Gärtner, Petra Reinhold, Karsten Donat
{"title":"[奶牛群酸碱状态不同监测方法的比较]。","authors":"Tanja Gärtner, Petra Reinhold, Karsten Donat","doi":"10.1055/a-2317-1359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Object and purpose: </strong>Acid-base disorders in dairy herds can be diagnosed by determining urinary net base excretion (NBE). Modifications of this method are the differential NBE (dNBE) with determination of the urinary concentration-independent base-acid ratio (BAR) and the simplified NBE test with reduced urine volume (sNBE). The aim of this study was to compare these methods among themselves and as a pooled test, in their assessment of cow group acid base status as well as to derive recommendations for practical use.</p><p><strong>Animals, material, and methods: </strong>The concentrations of NBE, dNBE, and sNBE were measured in urine samples derived from 855 German-Holstein cows in 127 cow groups at different stages of lactation. BAR was then calculated. dNBE and BAR were determined both individually per cow and as a pool of a group. Mixed linear models were used to examine the relationship between the mean of the individual animal values and the pool sample result of a group for these two parameters. In addition, all groups were evaluated with respect to acidotic or alkalotic load based on their single animal results of the respective methods, the mean values formed from them, and the measured pool result. By using the single animal BAR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated mean values of the individual measurements of dNBE and BAR differed from the measured value in the pool sample, especially in low and high measurement ranges. In the group assessment, NBE showed the best combined sensitivity and specificity for the detection of acid base disorders. The dNBE pool assay showed satisfactory specificity with respect to acidosis and alkalosis, while the sNBE on an individual animal basis and the BAR determination in the pool showed satisfactory sensitivity with respect to acidosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>It was shown that NBE determined in individual animal samples is well suited for the assessment of acid base status of cow groups and can therefore be recommended for practical use. The determination of dNBE as well as BAR as a pool test is not sufficient for the detection of alkalotic load in cow groups but may help to confirm an existing acidotic load.</p>","PeriodicalId":23115,"journal":{"name":"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of different methods for monitoring of acid base status in dairy cow herds].\",\"authors\":\"Tanja Gärtner, Petra Reinhold, Karsten Donat\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2317-1359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Object and purpose: </strong>Acid-base disorders in dairy herds can be diagnosed by determining urinary net base excretion (NBE). Modifications of this method are the differential NBE (dNBE) with determination of the urinary concentration-independent base-acid ratio (BAR) and the simplified NBE test with reduced urine volume (sNBE). The aim of this study was to compare these methods among themselves and as a pooled test, in their assessment of cow group acid base status as well as to derive recommendations for practical use.</p><p><strong>Animals, material, and methods: </strong>The concentrations of NBE, dNBE, and sNBE were measured in urine samples derived from 855 German-Holstein cows in 127 cow groups at different stages of lactation. BAR was then calculated. dNBE and BAR were determined both individually per cow and as a pool of a group. Mixed linear models were used to examine the relationship between the mean of the individual animal values and the pool sample result of a group for these two parameters. In addition, all groups were evaluated with respect to acidotic or alkalotic load based on their single animal results of the respective methods, the mean values formed from them, and the measured pool result. By using the single animal BAR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated mean values of the individual measurements of dNBE and BAR differed from the measured value in the pool sample, especially in low and high measurement ranges. In the group assessment, NBE showed the best combined sensitivity and specificity for the detection of acid base disorders. The dNBE pool assay showed satisfactory specificity with respect to acidosis and alkalosis, while the sNBE on an individual animal basis and the BAR determination in the pool showed satisfactory sensitivity with respect to acidosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical relevance: </strong>It was shown that NBE determined in individual animal samples is well suited for the assessment of acid base status of cow groups and can therefore be recommended for practical use. The determination of dNBE as well as BAR as a pool test is not sufficient for the detection of alkalotic load in cow groups but may help to confirm an existing acidotic load.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2317-1359\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2317-1359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和宗旨:可通过测定尿净碱排泄量(NBE)来诊断奶牛群的酸碱紊乱。该方法的改良版是测定与尿液浓度无关的碱酸比值(BAR)的差分 NBE(dNBE)和减少尿量的简化 NBE 试验(sNBE)。本研究的目的是比较这些方法在评估奶牛群体酸碱状态时的相互影响,并为实际使用提出建议:对 127 个奶牛群中不同泌乳阶段的 855 头德国荷斯坦奶牛的尿样中的 NBE、dNBE 和 sNBE 浓度进行了测定。每头奶牛的 dNBE 和 BAR 都是单独测定的,也作为一个牛群的集合进行测定。混合线性模型用于研究这两个参数的单头动物平均值与组内集合样本结果之间的关系。此外,还根据各方法得出的单头动物结果、由此得出的平均值和测得的集合结果,对所有组的酸性或碱性负荷进行了评估。以单个动物 BAR 为参考,计算不同方法的灵敏度和特异性:结果:dNBE 和 BAR 的单个测量值的计算平均值与集合样本的测量值存在差异,尤其是在低和高测量范围内。在集体评估中,NBE 在检测酸碱紊乱方面显示出最佳的综合灵敏度和特异性。在酸中毒和碱中毒方面,dNBE池测定显示出令人满意的特异性,而以动物个体为基础的sNBE和池中BAR测定在酸中毒方面显示出令人满意的灵敏度:研究表明,在单个动物样本中测定 NBE 非常适合评估奶牛群体的酸碱状态,因此可推荐用于实际应用。测定 dNBE 和 BAR 作为集合检测不足以检测奶牛群的碱中毒负荷,但有助于确认现有的酸中毒负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparison of different methods for monitoring of acid base status in dairy cow herds].

Object and purpose: Acid-base disorders in dairy herds can be diagnosed by determining urinary net base excretion (NBE). Modifications of this method are the differential NBE (dNBE) with determination of the urinary concentration-independent base-acid ratio (BAR) and the simplified NBE test with reduced urine volume (sNBE). The aim of this study was to compare these methods among themselves and as a pooled test, in their assessment of cow group acid base status as well as to derive recommendations for practical use.

Animals, material, and methods: The concentrations of NBE, dNBE, and sNBE were measured in urine samples derived from 855 German-Holstein cows in 127 cow groups at different stages of lactation. BAR was then calculated. dNBE and BAR were determined both individually per cow and as a pool of a group. Mixed linear models were used to examine the relationship between the mean of the individual animal values and the pool sample result of a group for these two parameters. In addition, all groups were evaluated with respect to acidotic or alkalotic load based on their single animal results of the respective methods, the mean values formed from them, and the measured pool result. By using the single animal BAR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods were calculated.

Results: The calculated mean values of the individual measurements of dNBE and BAR differed from the measured value in the pool sample, especially in low and high measurement ranges. In the group assessment, NBE showed the best combined sensitivity and specificity for the detection of acid base disorders. The dNBE pool assay showed satisfactory specificity with respect to acidosis and alkalosis, while the sNBE on an individual animal basis and the BAR determination in the pool showed satisfactory sensitivity with respect to acidosis.

Conclusions and clinical relevance: It was shown that NBE determined in individual animal samples is well suited for the assessment of acid base status of cow groups and can therefore be recommended for practical use. The determination of dNBE as well as BAR as a pool test is not sufficient for the detection of alkalotic load in cow groups but may help to confirm an existing acidotic load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Die Tierärztliche Praxis wendet sich mit ihren beiden Reihen als einzige veterinärmedizinische Fachzeitschrift explizit an den Großtier- bzw. Kleintierpraktiker und garantiert damit eine zielgruppengenaue Ansprache. Für den Spezialisten bietet sie Original- oder Übersichtsartikel zu neuen Therapie- und Operationsverfahren oder den Einsatz moderner bildgebender Verfahren. Der weniger spezialisierte Tierarzt oder Berufseinsteiger findet auf seinen Berufsalltag zugeschnittene praxisbezogene Beiträge in der Fortbildungsrubrik „Aus Studium und Praxis“. Mit dem hervorgehobenen „Fazit für die Praxis“ am Ende jedes Artikels verschafft sich auch der eilige Leser einen raschen Überblick über die wichtigsten Inhalte dieser modern konzipierten Fachzeitschrift mit den vielen hochwertigen, überwiegend farbigen Abbildungen. In jedem Heft ermöglicht ein ATF-anerkannter Fortbildungsartikel den Erwerb einer ATF-Stunde (Akademie für tierärztliche Fortbildung).
期刊最新文献
[An application for mobile devices as a decision support for the treatment and prevention of bovine fasciolosis - A survey among organic dairy farms in Bavaria]. [Association between perinatal mortality and the management of cows before and at calving in large dairy herds]. [Research priorities and quality of scientific literature on dystocia in cows from 1960-2020]. How reliable is your diagnosis? In vitro capsule or biofilm formation of Streptococcus uberis and bacteriological cure of bovine mastitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1