脑氧饱和度指导治疗对早产儿脑损伤的影响--由足月时的磁共振成像评估:一项 SafeBoosC-III 辅助研究。

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1159/000539175
Miguel Alsina-Casanova, Mathias Lühr-Hansen, Victoria Aldecoa-Bilbao, Ruth Del Rio, Pierre Maton, Kosmas Sarafidis, Pamela Zafra-Rodriguez, Zachary Andrew Vesoulis, Emmanuele Mastretta, Ilia Bresesti, Marta Gomez-Chiari, Mónica Rebollo, Jamil Khamis, Angelos Baltatzidis, Isabel Benavente-Fernandez, Joshua Shimony, Giovanni Morana, Massimo Agosti, Nuria Carreras, Adriana Cuaresma, Ambre Gau, Athanasia Anastasiou, Simón Pedro Lubian-López, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Paola Sciortino, Francesca Dessimone, Markus Harboe Olsen, Thais Agut, Gorm Greisen
{"title":"脑氧饱和度指导治疗对早产儿脑损伤的影响--由足月时的磁共振成像评估:一项 SafeBoosC-III 辅助研究。","authors":"Miguel Alsina-Casanova, Mathias Lühr-Hansen, Victoria Aldecoa-Bilbao, Ruth Del Rio, Pierre Maton, Kosmas Sarafidis, Pamela Zafra-Rodriguez, Zachary Andrew Vesoulis, Emmanuele Mastretta, Ilia Bresesti, Marta Gomez-Chiari, Mónica Rebollo, Jamil Khamis, Angelos Baltatzidis, Isabel Benavente-Fernandez, Joshua Shimony, Giovanni Morana, Massimo Agosti, Nuria Carreras, Adriana Cuaresma, Ambre Gau, Athanasia Anastasiou, Simón Pedro Lubian-López, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Paola Sciortino, Francesca Dessimone, Markus Harboe Olsen, Thais Agut, Gorm Greisen","doi":"10.1159/000539175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The SafeBoosC-III trial investigated the effect of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment in the first 72 h after birth on mortality and severe brain injury diagnosed by cranial ultrasound in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). This ancillary study evaluated the effect of cerebral oximetry on global brain injury as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at term equivalent age (TEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI scans were obtained between 36 and 44.9 weeks PMA. The Kidokoro score was independently evaluated by two blinded assessors. The intervention effect was assessed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for median difference and 95% Hodges-Lehmann (HL) confidence intervals (CIs). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement between the assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 patients from 8 centers were included, of whom 121 underwent MRI at TEA (75.6% of alive patients): 57 in the cerebral oximetry group and 64 in the usual care group. There was an excellent correlation between the assessors for the Kidokoro score (ICC agreement: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). The results showed no significant differences between the cerebral oximetry group (median 2, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-4) and the usual care group (median 3, IQR: 1-4; median difference -1 to 0, 95% HLCI: -1 to 0; p value 0.1196).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In EPI, the use of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment did not lead to significant alterations in brain injury, as determined by MRI at TEA. The strong correlation between the assessors highlights the potential of the Kidokoro score in multicenter trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Cerebral Oximetry-Guided Treatment on Brain Injury in Preterm Infants as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Term Equivalent Age: An Ancillary SafeBoosC-III Study.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Alsina-Casanova, Mathias Lühr-Hansen, Victoria Aldecoa-Bilbao, Ruth Del Rio, Pierre Maton, Kosmas Sarafidis, Pamela Zafra-Rodriguez, Zachary Andrew Vesoulis, Emmanuele Mastretta, Ilia Bresesti, Marta Gomez-Chiari, Mónica Rebollo, Jamil Khamis, Angelos Baltatzidis, Isabel Benavente-Fernandez, Joshua Shimony, Giovanni Morana, Massimo Agosti, Nuria Carreras, Adriana Cuaresma, Ambre Gau, Athanasia Anastasiou, Simón Pedro Lubian-López, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Paola Sciortino, Francesca Dessimone, Markus Harboe Olsen, Thais Agut, Gorm Greisen\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The SafeBoosC-III trial investigated the effect of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment in the first 72 h after birth on mortality and severe brain injury diagnosed by cranial ultrasound in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). This ancillary study evaluated the effect of cerebral oximetry on global brain injury as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at term equivalent age (TEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI scans were obtained between 36 and 44.9 weeks PMA. The Kidokoro score was independently evaluated by two blinded assessors. The intervention effect was assessed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for median difference and 95% Hodges-Lehmann (HL) confidence intervals (CIs). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement between the assessors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 patients from 8 centers were included, of whom 121 underwent MRI at TEA (75.6% of alive patients): 57 in the cerebral oximetry group and 64 in the usual care group. There was an excellent correlation between the assessors for the Kidokoro score (ICC agreement: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). The results showed no significant differences between the cerebral oximetry group (median 2, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-4) and the usual care group (median 3, IQR: 1-4; median difference -1 to 0, 95% HLCI: -1 to 0; p value 0.1196).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In EPI, the use of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment did not lead to significant alterations in brain injury, as determined by MRI at TEA. The strong correlation between the assessors highlights the potential of the Kidokoro score in multicenter trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言SafeBoosC-III试验调查了极早产儿(EPIs)出生后72小时内在脑氧饱和度指导下进行治疗对死亡率和头颅超声诊断出的严重脑损伤的影响。这项辅助研究评估了脑氧饱和度对足月等效年龄(TEA)时通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估的整体脑损伤的影响:磁共振成像扫描是在足月等效年龄(PMA)36 到 44.9 周之间进行的。Kidokoro 评分由两名盲人评估员独立评估。采用非参数 Wilcoxon 秩和检验评估干预效果的中位数差异和 95% Hodges-Lehmann (HL) 置信区间 (CI)。类内相关系数(ICC)用于评估评估者之间的一致性:共纳入了来自 8 个中心的 210 名患者,其中 121 人在 TEA 接受了磁共振成像检查(占存活患者的 75.6%):脑氧仪组 57 人,常规护理组 64 人。Kidokoro评分的评估者之间存在极好的相关性(ICC一致性:0.93,95% CI:0.91-0.95)。结果显示,脑氧仪组(中位数为 2,四分位数间距 [IQR]:1-4)与常规护理组(中位数为 3,四分位数间距 [IQR]:1-4;中位数差异-1 至 0,95% HLCI:-1 至 0;P 值 0.1196)之间无明显差异:结论:在 EPI 中,使用脑氧饱和度指导治疗并不会导致脑损伤的显著改变,这是由 TEA 时的核磁共振成像确定的。评估者之间的强相关性凸显了 Kidokoro 评分在多中心试验中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Cerebral Oximetry-Guided Treatment on Brain Injury in Preterm Infants as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Term Equivalent Age: An Ancillary SafeBoosC-III Study.

Introduction: The SafeBoosC-III trial investigated the effect of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment in the first 72 h after birth on mortality and severe brain injury diagnosed by cranial ultrasound in extremely preterm infants (EPIs). This ancillary study evaluated the effect of cerebral oximetry on global brain injury as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at term equivalent age (TEA).

Methods: MRI scans were obtained between 36 and 44.9 weeks PMA. The Kidokoro score was independently evaluated by two blinded assessors. The intervention effect was assessed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test for median difference and 95% Hodges-Lehmann (HL) confidence intervals (CIs). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement between the assessors.

Results: A total of 210 patients from 8 centers were included, of whom 121 underwent MRI at TEA (75.6% of alive patients): 57 in the cerebral oximetry group and 64 in the usual care group. There was an excellent correlation between the assessors for the Kidokoro score (ICC agreement: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). The results showed no significant differences between the cerebral oximetry group (median 2, interquartile range [IQR]: 1-4) and the usual care group (median 3, IQR: 1-4; median difference -1 to 0, 95% HLCI: -1 to 0; p value 0.1196).

Conclusions: In EPI, the use of cerebral oximetry-guided treatment did not lead to significant alterations in brain injury, as determined by MRI at TEA. The strong correlation between the assessors highlights the potential of the Kidokoro score in multicenter trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review. Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis. Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence. Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1