地球以外的火山活动:对以地球为中心的火山-构造关联因果关系模型的影响

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104847
Edgardo Cañón-Tapia
{"title":"地球以外的火山活动:对以地球为中心的火山-构造关联因果关系模型的影响","authors":"Edgardo Cañón-Tapia","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The evolution of ideas concerning the origin of volcanic activity is far from being simple. Nevertheless, an examination of the main lines of thought about volcanism throughout history allows us to identify general trends that explain why some hypotheses were accepted at a given time, even when there was contemporary evidence suggesting critical problems of those hypotheses. Throughout history, it is observed that the form in which new pieces of evidence have been incorporated into existing paradigms has played a critical role in the development of new concepts. However, it can also be established that the drive to make new discoveries has not been accompanied always by the immediate assimilation of that evidence in the corpus of scientific research. Thus, competing ideas or hypotheses sometimes have co-existed for many years. A current example of such debates concerns the plate vs. plume origin of volcanic activity on our planet. In this work I examine this issue from a methodological point of view that combines a historical perspective with rigorous definitions of causality. The historical approach helps us to understand aspects of the debate that otherwise might be too sensitive to point out without spurring partisan reactions. The examination of causality relations serves to appreciate the many implications that the discovery of volcanic activity beyond Earth should have brought to the forefront of the debate, but that, for many reasons, has failed to do so. By combining both methodological perspectives, I present a new framework upon which questions such as “Do all intraplate volcanoes on Earth are produced by the action of mantle plumes?” can be addressed without the risk of falling into circular arguments. The framework outlined here, therefore, presents a viable alternative that could help us focus future efforts to fully understand aspects of the volcano-tectonic relationship that are difficult to appreciate given the current plate and plume paradigms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volcanism beyond Earth: Influence on Earth-centered causality models of volcano-tectonic associations\",\"authors\":\"Edgardo Cañón-Tapia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The evolution of ideas concerning the origin of volcanic activity is far from being simple. Nevertheless, an examination of the main lines of thought about volcanism throughout history allows us to identify general trends that explain why some hypotheses were accepted at a given time, even when there was contemporary evidence suggesting critical problems of those hypotheses. Throughout history, it is observed that the form in which new pieces of evidence have been incorporated into existing paradigms has played a critical role in the development of new concepts. However, it can also be established that the drive to make new discoveries has not been accompanied always by the immediate assimilation of that evidence in the corpus of scientific research. Thus, competing ideas or hypotheses sometimes have co-existed for many years. A current example of such debates concerns the plate vs. plume origin of volcanic activity on our planet. In this work I examine this issue from a methodological point of view that combines a historical perspective with rigorous definitions of causality. The historical approach helps us to understand aspects of the debate that otherwise might be too sensitive to point out without spurring partisan reactions. The examination of causality relations serves to appreciate the many implications that the discovery of volcanic activity beyond Earth should have brought to the forefront of the debate, but that, for many reasons, has failed to do so. By combining both methodological perspectives, I present a new framework upon which questions such as “Do all intraplate volcanoes on Earth are produced by the action of mantle plumes?” can be addressed without the risk of falling into circular arguments. The framework outlined here, therefore, presents a viable alternative that could help us focus future efforts to fully understand aspects of the volcano-tectonic relationship that are difficult to appreciate given the current plate and plume paradigms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224001740\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224001740","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有关火山活动起源的思想演变远非如此简单。尽管如此,通过研究历史上有关火山活动的主要思想脉络,我们可以发现一些总体趋势,从而解释为什么某些假说在特定时期被接受,即使有当代证据表明这些假说存在严重问题。纵观历史,我们可以发现,将新证据纳入现有范式的形式在新概念的发展中起到了至关重要的作用。然而,我们也可以确定,新发现的动力并不总是伴随着科学研究中对证据的立即吸收。因此,相互竞争的观点或假设有时会并存许多年。目前这种争论的一个例子涉及地球上火山活动的板块起源和羽流起源。在这部著作中,我从方法论的角度研究了这一问题,将历史视角与严格的因果关系定义相结合。历史方法有助于我们理解辩论中的一些方面,否则可能会因为过于敏感而无法在不引起党派反应的情况下指出这些方面。对因果关系的研究有助于理解地球外火山活动的发现本应引起争论,但由于种种原因未能引起争论的诸多影响。通过结合这两种方法论视角,我提出了一个新的框架,在这个框架上,诸如 "地球上所有板内火山都是由地幔羽流作用产生的吗?"这样的问题可以得到解决,而不会陷入循环论证的风险。因此,本文概述的框架提出了一个可行的替代方案,可以帮助我们集中精力,在未来充分理解火山与构造关系的各个方面,而这些方面在目前的板块和羽流范式下是很难理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volcanism beyond Earth: Influence on Earth-centered causality models of volcano-tectonic associations

The evolution of ideas concerning the origin of volcanic activity is far from being simple. Nevertheless, an examination of the main lines of thought about volcanism throughout history allows us to identify general trends that explain why some hypotheses were accepted at a given time, even when there was contemporary evidence suggesting critical problems of those hypotheses. Throughout history, it is observed that the form in which new pieces of evidence have been incorporated into existing paradigms has played a critical role in the development of new concepts. However, it can also be established that the drive to make new discoveries has not been accompanied always by the immediate assimilation of that evidence in the corpus of scientific research. Thus, competing ideas or hypotheses sometimes have co-existed for many years. A current example of such debates concerns the plate vs. plume origin of volcanic activity on our planet. In this work I examine this issue from a methodological point of view that combines a historical perspective with rigorous definitions of causality. The historical approach helps us to understand aspects of the debate that otherwise might be too sensitive to point out without spurring partisan reactions. The examination of causality relations serves to appreciate the many implications that the discovery of volcanic activity beyond Earth should have brought to the forefront of the debate, but that, for many reasons, has failed to do so. By combining both methodological perspectives, I present a new framework upon which questions such as “Do all intraplate volcanoes on Earth are produced by the action of mantle plumes?” can be addressed without the risk of falling into circular arguments. The framework outlined here, therefore, presents a viable alternative that could help us focus future efforts to fully understand aspects of the volcano-tectonic relationship that are difficult to appreciate given the current plate and plume paradigms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Cenozoic intracontinental tectonics of Mongolia and its climate effects: A synthesized review Glacial erosion and Quaternary landscape development of the Eurasian Arctic Early Cenozoic drainage network and paleogeographic evolution within the SE Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding area: Synthetic constraints from onshore-offshore geological dataset Enhanced global dust counteracted greenhouse warming during the mid- to late-Holocene Research status and prospects of CO2 geological sequestration technology from onshore to offshore: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1