David Palombo, Andrea Dobos, Mercedes Lopez Duran, Javier Sanz Esporrin, Mariano Sanz
{"title":"无需止血缝合即可收获上皮化牙龈移植物:使用激光斑点对比成像的随机临床试验","authors":"David Palombo, Andrea Dobos, Mercedes Lopez Duran, Javier Sanz Esporrin, Mariano Sanz","doi":"10.1002/jper.23-0620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio aimed to compare early microvascular healing (primary outcome), surgical times, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) after harvesting palatal epithelialized gingival grafts (EGG), where hemostasis was achieved with sutures and hemostatic sponges (control) or with a sutureless approach (test).MethodsFrom a total of 33 patients, 34 EGG were harvested. Thirty‐two were randomized to the test/control group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 16) and two were excluded. Early palatal microvascular healing was assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Postoperative bleeding, pain, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were assessed over 2 weeks with a dedicated questionnaire.ResultsA faster onset and resolution of postharvest hyperemia was observed in the test group where peak blood flow was reached at 7 days. No significant blood flow differences were observed between the groups at any of the evaluated timepoints. The mean surgical time was 13 min shorter in the test (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.00). No significant differences were observed for postoperative bleeding and analgesic consumption at any timepoint.ConclusionsThe tested approach represents a viable alternative to the standard one, providing no relevant differences in microvascular, clinical, and patient‐related results, but with significantly shorter surgical times.","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harvest of epithelialized gingival grafts without application of hemostatic sutures: A randomized clinical trial using laser speckle contrast imaging\",\"authors\":\"David Palombo, Andrea Dobos, Mercedes Lopez Duran, Javier Sanz Esporrin, Mariano Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jper.23-0620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio aimed to compare early microvascular healing (primary outcome), surgical times, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) after harvesting palatal epithelialized gingival grafts (EGG), where hemostasis was achieved with sutures and hemostatic sponges (control) or with a sutureless approach (test).MethodsFrom a total of 33 patients, 34 EGG were harvested. Thirty‐two were randomized to the test/control group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 16) and two were excluded. Early palatal microvascular healing was assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Postoperative bleeding, pain, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were assessed over 2 weeks with a dedicated questionnaire.ResultsA faster onset and resolution of postharvest hyperemia was observed in the test group where peak blood flow was reached at 7 days. No significant blood flow differences were observed between the groups at any of the evaluated timepoints. The mean surgical time was 13 min shorter in the test (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.00). No significant differences were observed for postoperative bleeding and analgesic consumption at any timepoint.ConclusionsThe tested approach represents a viable alternative to the standard one, providing no relevant differences in microvascular, clinical, and patient‐related results, but with significantly shorter surgical times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.23-0620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.23-0620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Harvest of epithelialized gingival grafts without application of hemostatic sutures: A randomized clinical trial using laser speckle contrast imaging
BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio aimed to compare early microvascular healing (primary outcome), surgical times, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) after harvesting palatal epithelialized gingival grafts (EGG), where hemostasis was achieved with sutures and hemostatic sponges (control) or with a sutureless approach (test).MethodsFrom a total of 33 patients, 34 EGG were harvested. Thirty‐two were randomized to the test/control group (n = 16) and two were excluded. Early palatal microvascular healing was assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Postoperative bleeding, pain, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were assessed over 2 weeks with a dedicated questionnaire.ResultsA faster onset and resolution of postharvest hyperemia was observed in the test group where peak blood flow was reached at 7 days. No significant blood flow differences were observed between the groups at any of the evaluated timepoints. The mean surgical time was 13 min shorter in the test (p = 0.00). No significant differences were observed for postoperative bleeding and analgesic consumption at any timepoint.ConclusionsThe tested approach represents a viable alternative to the standard one, providing no relevant differences in microvascular, clinical, and patient‐related results, but with significantly shorter surgical times.