无需止血缝合即可收获上皮化牙龈移植物:使用激光斑点对比成像的随机临床试验

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of periodontology Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1002/jper.23-0620
David Palombo, Andrea Dobos, Mercedes Lopez Duran, Javier Sanz Esporrin, Mariano Sanz
{"title":"无需止血缝合即可收获上皮化牙龈移植物:使用激光斑点对比成像的随机临床试验","authors":"David Palombo, Andrea Dobos, Mercedes Lopez Duran, Javier Sanz Esporrin, Mariano Sanz","doi":"10.1002/jper.23-0620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio aimed to compare early microvascular healing (primary outcome), surgical times, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) after harvesting palatal epithelialized gingival grafts (EGG), where hemostasis was achieved with sutures and hemostatic sponges (control) or with a sutureless approach (test).MethodsFrom a total of 33 patients, 34 EGG were harvested. Thirty‐two were randomized to the test/control group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 16) and two were excluded. Early palatal microvascular healing was assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Postoperative bleeding, pain, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were assessed over 2 weeks with a dedicated questionnaire.ResultsA faster onset and resolution of postharvest hyperemia was observed in the test group where peak blood flow was reached at 7 days. No significant blood flow differences were observed between the groups at any of the evaluated timepoints. The mean surgical time was 13 min shorter in the test (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.00). No significant differences were observed for postoperative bleeding and analgesic consumption at any timepoint.ConclusionsThe tested approach represents a viable alternative to the standard one, providing no relevant differences in microvascular, clinical, and patient‐related results, but with significantly shorter surgical times.","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harvest of epithelialized gingival grafts without application of hemostatic sutures: A randomized clinical trial using laser speckle contrast imaging\",\"authors\":\"David Palombo, Andrea Dobos, Mercedes Lopez Duran, Javier Sanz Esporrin, Mariano Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jper.23-0620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio aimed to compare early microvascular healing (primary outcome), surgical times, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) after harvesting palatal epithelialized gingival grafts (EGG), where hemostasis was achieved with sutures and hemostatic sponges (control) or with a sutureless approach (test).MethodsFrom a total of 33 patients, 34 EGG were harvested. Thirty‐two were randomized to the test/control group (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 16) and two were excluded. Early palatal microvascular healing was assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Postoperative bleeding, pain, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were assessed over 2 weeks with a dedicated questionnaire.ResultsA faster onset and resolution of postharvest hyperemia was observed in the test group where peak blood flow was reached at 7 days. No significant blood flow differences were observed between the groups at any of the evaluated timepoints. The mean surgical time was 13 min shorter in the test (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.00). No significant differences were observed for postoperative bleeding and analgesic consumption at any timepoint.ConclusionsThe tested approach represents a viable alternative to the standard one, providing no relevant differences in microvascular, clinical, and patient‐related results, but with significantly shorter surgical times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.23-0620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.23-0620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景这项随机对照试验有两个平行臂,分配比例为 1:1,旨在比较腭上皮化生牙龈移植物(EGG)采集后的早期微血管愈合(主要结果)、手术时间和患者报告结果(PROM),其中采用缝合和止血海绵止血(对照组)或采用无缝合方法止血(试验组)。32人被随机分配到试验/对照组(n = 16),2人被排除在外。通过激光斑点对比成像(LSCI)在 7、14 和 30 天评估腭部早期微血管愈合情况。使用专用问卷对术后两周内的出血、疼痛、不适和镇痛药消耗量进行评估。结果 在试验组观察到收获后充血开始和消退较快,7 天时血流达到峰值。在任何一个评估时间点,两组之间均未观察到明显的血流差异。试验组的平均手术时间缩短了 13 分钟(P = 0.00)。结论试验方法是标准方法的可行替代方案,在微血管、临床和患者相关结果方面没有相关差异,但手术时间明显缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Harvest of epithelialized gingival grafts without application of hemostatic sutures: A randomized clinical trial using laser speckle contrast imaging
BackgroundThis randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio aimed to compare early microvascular healing (primary outcome), surgical times, and patient‐reported outcomes (PROM) after harvesting palatal epithelialized gingival grafts (EGG), where hemostasis was achieved with sutures and hemostatic sponges (control) or with a sutureless approach (test).MethodsFrom a total of 33 patients, 34 EGG were harvested. Thirty‐two were randomized to the test/control group (n = 16) and two were excluded. Early palatal microvascular healing was assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI). Postoperative bleeding, pain, discomfort, and analgesic consumption were assessed over 2 weeks with a dedicated questionnaire.ResultsA faster onset and resolution of postharvest hyperemia was observed in the test group where peak blood flow was reached at 7 days. No significant blood flow differences were observed between the groups at any of the evaluated timepoints. The mean surgical time was 13 min shorter in the test (p = 0.00). No significant differences were observed for postoperative bleeding and analgesic consumption at any timepoint.ConclusionsThe tested approach represents a viable alternative to the standard one, providing no relevant differences in microvascular, clinical, and patient‐related results, but with significantly shorter surgical times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Appraising the life-course impact of Epstein-Barr virus exposure and its genetic signature on periodontitis. Effectiveness of nonsurgical re‐instrumentation: Tooth‐related factors ISSUE INFORMATION Gingival inflammation and leukocyte-endothelium cell interactions in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clinical outcomes of using operating microscope for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1