美国南部大平原灌溉苜蓿和雨浇苜蓿的二氧化碳通量

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY European Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.eja.2024.127265
Pradeep Wagle , Yuting Zhou , Brian K. Northup , Corey Moffet , Stacey A. Gunter
{"title":"美国南部大平原灌溉苜蓿和雨浇苜蓿的二氧化碳通量","authors":"Pradeep Wagle ,&nbsp;Yuting Zhou ,&nbsp;Brian K. Northup ,&nbsp;Corey Moffet ,&nbsp;Stacey A. Gunter","doi":"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The annual dynamics of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) fluxes for irrigated and rainfed alfalfa (<em>Medicago sativa</em> L.) in the Southern Great Plains of the United States of America (USA) under different watering regimes are not yet fully understood. The main objective of this study was to examine the dynamics of eddy covariance (EC) measured CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in relation to various biophysical factors and hay harvests for irrigated and rainfed alfalfa in central Oklahoma, USA. The study also aimed to investigate the relationship between CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and satellite-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI) at different spatiotemporal scales and to assess the temporal variability in CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and EVI to variable growing conditions and hay harvests. The cumulative hay yields were 7.15 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (two harvests in 2019) in the rainfed field and ∼9 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (4–5 harvests in 2020 and 2021) in the irrigated field. Having sufficient rainfall during April and May was crucial to achieve economically feasible yields of alfalfa during the first harvest in May. The availability of water strongly regulated the potential for regrowth and carbon uptake of alfalfa following harvesting. The alfalfa fields were near carbon neutral or a small carbon source from January to mid-March and carbon sink after the initiation of vegetative growth in mid-March. The alfalfa fields were strong carbon sinks (cumulative annual net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, NEE, up to −578 g C m<sup>−2</sup> in irrigated field) on an annual scale. When accounting for the loss of carbon due to the removal of hay from the fields, the carbon balance of the alfalfa fields varied from small carbon sinks to small carbon sources, depending on the amount of hay harvested annually and the growing conditions. In general, the temporal patterns of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and EVI were similar in relation to growing conditions and hay harvests. However, some discrepancies and time lags were observed due to the coarse spatiotemporal resolution of the EVI products. Thus, it is essential to integrate two or more satellite products with different temporal and spatial resolutions to accurately monitor the frequent and varying sizes of hay harvests and vegetation regrowth after harvesting, and to simulate continuous time-series CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon dioxide fluxes over irrigated and rainfed alfalfa in the Southern Great Plains, USA\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Wagle ,&nbsp;Yuting Zhou ,&nbsp;Brian K. Northup ,&nbsp;Corey Moffet ,&nbsp;Stacey A. Gunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eja.2024.127265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The annual dynamics of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) fluxes for irrigated and rainfed alfalfa (<em>Medicago sativa</em> L.) in the Southern Great Plains of the United States of America (USA) under different watering regimes are not yet fully understood. The main objective of this study was to examine the dynamics of eddy covariance (EC) measured CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in relation to various biophysical factors and hay harvests for irrigated and rainfed alfalfa in central Oklahoma, USA. The study also aimed to investigate the relationship between CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and satellite-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI) at different spatiotemporal scales and to assess the temporal variability in CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and EVI to variable growing conditions and hay harvests. The cumulative hay yields were 7.15 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (two harvests in 2019) in the rainfed field and ∼9 t ha<sup>−1</sup> (4–5 harvests in 2020 and 2021) in the irrigated field. Having sufficient rainfall during April and May was crucial to achieve economically feasible yields of alfalfa during the first harvest in May. The availability of water strongly regulated the potential for regrowth and carbon uptake of alfalfa following harvesting. The alfalfa fields were near carbon neutral or a small carbon source from January to mid-March and carbon sink after the initiation of vegetative growth in mid-March. The alfalfa fields were strong carbon sinks (cumulative annual net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, NEE, up to −578 g C m<sup>−2</sup> in irrigated field) on an annual scale. When accounting for the loss of carbon due to the removal of hay from the fields, the carbon balance of the alfalfa fields varied from small carbon sinks to small carbon sources, depending on the amount of hay harvested annually and the growing conditions. In general, the temporal patterns of CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and EVI were similar in relation to growing conditions and hay harvests. However, some discrepancies and time lags were observed due to the coarse spatiotemporal resolution of the EVI products. Thus, it is essential to integrate two or more satellite products with different temporal and spatial resolutions to accurately monitor the frequent and varying sizes of hay harvests and vegetation regrowth after harvesting, and to simulate continuous time-series CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001862\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030124001862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国南部大平原灌溉和雨养紫花苜蓿(L. )在不同浇水制度下的二氧化碳(CO)通量年度动态尚未完全清楚。本研究的主要目的是研究涡度协方差(EC)测量的二氧化碳通量与各种生物物理因素以及美国俄克拉荷马州中部灌溉苜蓿和雨养苜蓿的干草收获量之间的动态关系。该研究还旨在调查不同时空尺度的一氧化碳通量与卫星衍生的增强植被指数(EVI)之间的关系,并评估一氧化碳通量和增强植被指数在不同生长条件和干草收成下的时变性。雨水灌溉田的累计干草产量为 7.15 吨/公顷(2019 年收获 2 次),灌溉田的累计干草产量为 9 吨/公顷(2020 年和 2021 年收获 4-5 次)。4 月和 5 月的充足降雨量对于 5 月第一次收割时实现经济上可行的紫花苜蓿产量至关重要。水的供应对收割后紫花苜蓿的再生潜力和碳吸收能力有很大的影响。从 1 月到 3 月中旬,紫花苜蓿田接近碳中和或为少量碳源,3 月中旬开始无性繁殖后为碳汇。紫花苜蓿田每年都有很强的碳汇能力(在灌溉田中,年累计生态系统净二氧化碳交换量(NEE)高达-578 g C m)。如果考虑到从苜蓿田中清除干草造成的碳损失,苜蓿田的碳平衡从小规模碳汇到小规模碳源不等,这取决于每年收获的干草数量和生长条件。总体而言,二氧化碳通量和 EVI 的时间模式与生长条件和干草收割情况相似。然而,由于 EVI 产品的时空分辨率较低,观察到一些差异和时滞。因此,有必要整合两种或更多种不同时空分辨率的卫星产品,以准确监测干草收割的频率和规模以及收割后植被的恢复情况,并模拟连续的时间序列二氧化碳通量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon dioxide fluxes over irrigated and rainfed alfalfa in the Southern Great Plains, USA

The annual dynamics of carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes for irrigated and rainfed alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in the Southern Great Plains of the United States of America (USA) under different watering regimes are not yet fully understood. The main objective of this study was to examine the dynamics of eddy covariance (EC) measured CO2 fluxes in relation to various biophysical factors and hay harvests for irrigated and rainfed alfalfa in central Oklahoma, USA. The study also aimed to investigate the relationship between CO2 fluxes and satellite-derived enhanced vegetation index (EVI) at different spatiotemporal scales and to assess the temporal variability in CO2 fluxes and EVI to variable growing conditions and hay harvests. The cumulative hay yields were 7.15 t ha−1 (two harvests in 2019) in the rainfed field and ∼9 t ha−1 (4–5 harvests in 2020 and 2021) in the irrigated field. Having sufficient rainfall during April and May was crucial to achieve economically feasible yields of alfalfa during the first harvest in May. The availability of water strongly regulated the potential for regrowth and carbon uptake of alfalfa following harvesting. The alfalfa fields were near carbon neutral or a small carbon source from January to mid-March and carbon sink after the initiation of vegetative growth in mid-March. The alfalfa fields were strong carbon sinks (cumulative annual net ecosystem CO2 exchange, NEE, up to −578 g C m−2 in irrigated field) on an annual scale. When accounting for the loss of carbon due to the removal of hay from the fields, the carbon balance of the alfalfa fields varied from small carbon sinks to small carbon sources, depending on the amount of hay harvested annually and the growing conditions. In general, the temporal patterns of CO2 fluxes and EVI were similar in relation to growing conditions and hay harvests. However, some discrepancies and time lags were observed due to the coarse spatiotemporal resolution of the EVI products. Thus, it is essential to integrate two or more satellite products with different temporal and spatial resolutions to accurately monitor the frequent and varying sizes of hay harvests and vegetation regrowth after harvesting, and to simulate continuous time-series CO2 fluxes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Agronomy
European Journal of Agronomy 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Agronomy, the official journal of the European Society for Agronomy, publishes original research papers reporting experimental and theoretical contributions to field-based agronomy and crop science. The journal will consider research at the field level for agricultural, horticultural and tree crops, that uses comprehensive and explanatory approaches. The EJA covers the following topics: crop physiology crop production and management including irrigation, fertilization and soil management agroclimatology and modelling plant-soil relationships crop quality and post-harvest physiology farming and cropping systems agroecosystems and the environment crop-weed interactions and management organic farming horticultural crops papers from the European Society for Agronomy bi-annual meetings In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny is placed on the degree of novelty and significance of the research and the extent to which it adds to existing knowledge in agronomy.
期刊最新文献
Nitrogen reduction enhances crop productivity, decreases soil nitrogen loss and optimize its balance in wheat-maize cropping area of the Loess Plateau, China Optimal agronomic measures combined with biochar increased rice yield through enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in soda saline-alkali fields Coupling a dynamic epidemiological model into a process-based crop model to simulate climate change effects on soybean target spot disease in Brazil A custom pipeline for building computational models of plant tissue Estimating rice leaf area index at multiple growth stages with Sentinel-2 data: An evaluation of different retrieval algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1