使用重大头部损伤后皮质类固醇随机化(CRASH)预后模型作为中低收入国家接受手术的脑外伤患者的死亡率预测指标》(The Use of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Prognostic Model as Mortality Predictor of Traumatic Brainjury Patients Underwed Surgery in Low-Middle Income Countries)。

IF 1.5 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5241605
Radian A Halimi, Iwan Fuadi, Dionisius Alby
{"title":"使用重大头部损伤后皮质类固醇随机化(CRASH)预后模型作为中低收入国家接受手术的脑外伤患者的死亡率预测指标》(The Use of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Prognostic Model as Mortality Predictor of Traumatic Brainjury Patients Underwed Surgery in Low-Middle Income Countries)。","authors":"Radian A Halimi, Iwan Fuadi, Dionisius Alby","doi":"10.1155/2024/5241605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a disruption to normal brain functions caused by traumas such as collisions, blows, or penetrating injuries. There are factors affecting patient outcomes that also have a predictive value. Limited data from low-middle income countries showed a high number of poor outcomes in TBI patients. The corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury (CRASH) prognostic model is a predictive model that uses such factors and is often used in developed countries. The model has an excellent discriminative ability. However, there is still a lack of studies on its use in surgical patients in low-middle income countries. This study aimed to evaluate the CRASH model's validity to predict 14-day mortality of TBI patients who underwent surgery in low-middle income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analytical observational study employed total sampling including all TBI patients who underwent surgery with general anesthesia from January to December 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by applying Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact tests, while the model's discriminative ability was determined through the area under the curve (AUC) calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>112 TBI patients were admitted during the study period, and 74 patients were included. Independent statistical analysis showed that 14-day mortality risk, age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, TBI severity, pupillary response, and major extracranial trauma had a significant individual correlation with patients' actual mortality outcome (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The AUC analysis revealed an excellent mortality prediction (AUC 0.838; CI 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CRASH prognostic model performs well in predicting the 14-day mortality of TBI patients who underwent surgery in low-middle income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"5241605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Prognostic Model as Mortality Predictor of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Underwent Surgery in Low-Middle Income Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Radian A Halimi, Iwan Fuadi, Dionisius Alby\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5241605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a disruption to normal brain functions caused by traumas such as collisions, blows, or penetrating injuries. There are factors affecting patient outcomes that also have a predictive value. Limited data from low-middle income countries showed a high number of poor outcomes in TBI patients. The corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury (CRASH) prognostic model is a predictive model that uses such factors and is often used in developed countries. The model has an excellent discriminative ability. However, there is still a lack of studies on its use in surgical patients in low-middle income countries. This study aimed to evaluate the CRASH model's validity to predict 14-day mortality of TBI patients who underwent surgery in low-middle income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analytical observational study employed total sampling including all TBI patients who underwent surgery with general anesthesia from January to December 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by applying Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact tests, while the model's discriminative ability was determined through the area under the curve (AUC) calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>112 TBI patients were admitted during the study period, and 74 patients were included. Independent statistical analysis showed that 14-day mortality risk, age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, TBI severity, pupillary response, and major extracranial trauma had a significant individual correlation with patients' actual mortality outcome (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The AUC analysis revealed an excellent mortality prediction (AUC 0.838; CI 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CRASH prognostic model performs well in predicting the 14-day mortality of TBI patients who underwent surgery in low-middle income countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2024 \",\"pages\":\"5241605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5241605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5241605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是指由碰撞、打击或穿透性损伤等创伤引起的正常脑功能紊乱。影响患者预后的一些因素也具有预测价值。来自中低收入国家的有限数据显示,创伤性脑损伤患者的不良预后较多。重大头部损伤后的皮质类固醇随机化(CRASH)预后模型是一种使用此类因素的预测模型,通常用于发达国家。该模型具有出色的判别能力。然而,在中低收入国家仍缺乏将其用于外科手术患者的研究。本研究旨在评估 CRASH 模型在预测中低收入国家接受手术的创伤性脑损伤患者 14 天死亡率方面的有效性:这项回顾性分析观察研究采用总体抽样法,包括2022年1月至12月期间接受全身麻醉手术的所有创伤性脑损伤患者。统计分析采用曼-惠特尼检验和费舍尔精确检验,而模型的判别能力则通过计算曲线下面积(AUC)来确定:研究期间共收治 112 名创伤性脑损伤患者,其中 74 名患者被纳入研究范围。独立统计分析显示,14 天死亡风险、年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、创伤性脑损伤严重程度、瞳孔反应和主要颅外创伤与患者的实际死亡结果有显著的个体相关性(P < 0.05)。AUC分析显示死亡率预测效果极佳(AUC 0.838;CI 95%):CRASH预后模型在预测中低收入国家接受手术的创伤性脑损伤患者的14天死亡率方面表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Prognostic Model as Mortality Predictor of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Underwent Surgery in Low-Middle Income Countries.

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a disruption to normal brain functions caused by traumas such as collisions, blows, or penetrating injuries. There are factors affecting patient outcomes that also have a predictive value. Limited data from low-middle income countries showed a high number of poor outcomes in TBI patients. The corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury (CRASH) prognostic model is a predictive model that uses such factors and is often used in developed countries. The model has an excellent discriminative ability. However, there is still a lack of studies on its use in surgical patients in low-middle income countries. This study aimed to evaluate the CRASH model's validity to predict 14-day mortality of TBI patients who underwent surgery in low-middle income countries.

Methods: This retrospective analytical observational study employed total sampling including all TBI patients who underwent surgery with general anesthesia from January to December 2022. Statistical analysis was performed by applying Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact tests, while the model's discriminative ability was determined through the area under the curve (AUC) calculations.

Results: 112 TBI patients were admitted during the study period, and 74 patients were included. Independent statistical analysis showed that 14-day mortality risk, age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, TBI severity, pupillary response, and major extracranial trauma had a significant individual correlation with patients' actual mortality outcome (p < 0.05). The AUC analysis revealed an excellent mortality prediction (AUC 0.838; CI 95%).

Conclusion: The CRASH prognostic model performs well in predicting the 14-day mortality of TBI patients who underwent surgery in low-middle income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early Postoperative Cognitive Performance After Total Arch Replacement: A Prospective Observational Study. Comparison on the Effectiveness of Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine in Reducing Emergence Agitation in Adults Undergoing Otorhinolaryngology Surgery. Hypertension and Postoperative Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Operating Room Professionals' Awareness of Possible Unconscious Auditory Perception During General Anesthesia: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Pharmacological Modulation of Perioperative Pain in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: An Updated Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Intravenous Lidocaine, Dexmedetomidine, Opioid-Free and Opioid-Sparing Anesthesia, and ERAS-Based Protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1