脓毒症重症成人在降钙素原或 C 反应蛋白指导下停用抗菌药物的益处和危害:系统综述与网络元分析》。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366
Kenji Kubo, Masaaki Sakuraya, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Nozomi Takahashi, Ken-Ichi Kano, Jumpei Yoshimura, Moritoki Egi, Yutaka Kondo
{"title":"脓毒症重症成人在降钙素原或 C 反应蛋白指导下停用抗菌药物的益处和危害:系统综述与网络元分析》。","authors":"Kenji Kubo, Masaaki Sakuraya, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Nozomi Takahashi, Ken-Ichi Kano, Jumpei Yoshimura, Moritoki Egi, Yutaka Kondo","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic cessation, but solid evidence is insufficient. Recently, concerns were raised that this strategy would increase recurrence. Additionally, optimal protocol or difference from the commonly used C-reactive protein (CRP) are uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic cessation strategies with standard of care in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials involving adults with sepsis in intensive care.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A systematic review with network meta-analyses was performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation method was used to assess certainty.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Eighteen studies involving 5023 participants were included. Procalcitonin-guided and CRP-guided strategies shortened antibiotic treatment (-1.89 days [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.47], -2.56 days [95% CI, -4.21 to -0.91]) with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In procalcitonin-guided strategies, this benefit was consistent even in subsets with shorter baseline antimicrobial duration (7-10 d) or in Sepsis-3, and more pronounced in procalcitonin cutoff of \"0.5 μg/L and 80% reduction.\" No benefit was observed when monitoring frequency was less than half of the initial 10 days. Procalcitonin-guided strategies lowered mortality (-27 per 1000 participants [95% CI, -45 to -7]) and this was pronounced in Sepsis-3, but CRP-guided strategies led to no difference in mortality. Recurrence did not increase significantly with either strategy (very low to low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In sepsis, procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategies may be beneficial and safe. In particular, the usefulness of procalcitonin guidance for current Sepsis-3, where antimicrobials are used for more than 7 days, was supported. Well-designed studies are needed focusing on monitoring protocol and recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e522-e534"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits and Harms of Procalcitonin- or C-Reactive Protein-Guided Antimicrobial Discontinuation in Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Kubo, Masaaki Sakuraya, Hiroshi Sugimoto, Nozomi Takahashi, Ken-Ichi Kano, Jumpei Yoshimura, Moritoki Egi, Yutaka Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic cessation, but solid evidence is insufficient. Recently, concerns were raised that this strategy would increase recurrence. Additionally, optimal protocol or difference from the commonly used C-reactive protein (CRP) are uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic cessation strategies with standard of care in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials involving adults with sepsis in intensive care.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>A systematic review with network meta-analyses was performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation method was used to assess certainty.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Eighteen studies involving 5023 participants were included. Procalcitonin-guided and CRP-guided strategies shortened antibiotic treatment (-1.89 days [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.47], -2.56 days [95% CI, -4.21 to -0.91]) with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In procalcitonin-guided strategies, this benefit was consistent even in subsets with shorter baseline antimicrobial duration (7-10 d) or in Sepsis-3, and more pronounced in procalcitonin cutoff of \\\"0.5 μg/L and 80% reduction.\\\" No benefit was observed when monitoring frequency was less than half of the initial 10 days. Procalcitonin-guided strategies lowered mortality (-27 per 1000 participants [95% CI, -45 to -7]) and this was pronounced in Sepsis-3, but CRP-guided strategies led to no difference in mortality. Recurrence did not increase significantly with either strategy (very low to low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In sepsis, procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategies may be beneficial and safe. In particular, the usefulness of procalcitonin guidance for current Sepsis-3, where antimicrobials are used for more than 7 days, was supported. Well-designed studies are needed focusing on monitoring protocol and recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e522-e534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在败血症治疗中,抗生素至关重要,但过度使用有可能产生抗生素耐药性。最近的指南建议使用降钙素原来指导抗生素的停用,但确凿证据不足。最近,有人担心这种策略会增加复发率。此外,最佳方案或与常用的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)的区别尚不确定。我们旨在比较降钙素原或CRP指导下的抗生素停药策略与脓毒症标准护理的有效性和安全性:数据来源:对PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、Igaku Chuo Zasshi、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验平台进行了系统检索:数据提取:数据提取:通过网络荟萃分析进行系统回顾。采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法评估确定性:共纳入了 18 项研究,涉及 5023 名参与者。降钙素原指导策略和CRP指导策略缩短了抗生素治疗时间(-1.89天[95% CI,-2.30至-1.47],-2.56天[95% CI,-4.21至-0.91]),证据为中低度确定性。在降钙素原指导策略中,即使在基线抗菌时间较短(7-10 d)的亚组或败血症-3中,这种获益也是一致的,而且在降钙素原临界值为 "0.5 μg/L且降低80%"时更为明显。当监测频率少于最初 10 天的一半时,未观察到任何益处。降钙素原指导策略降低了死亡率(每 1000 名参与者-27 [95% CI, -45 to -7]),这在败血症-3 中表现明显,但 CRP 指导策略在死亡率方面没有差异。无论采用哪种策略,复发率都不会明显增加(确定性很低到很低):在败血症中,降钙素原或 CRP 指导的抗生素停药策略可能是有益和安全的。尤其是在当前的败血症-3(使用抗菌药物超过 7 天)中,支持使用降钙素原指导。还需要进行精心设计的研究,重点关注监测方案和复发情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits and Harms of Procalcitonin- or C-Reactive Protein-Guided Antimicrobial Discontinuation in Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic cessation, but solid evidence is insufficient. Recently, concerns were raised that this strategy would increase recurrence. Additionally, optimal protocol or difference from the commonly used C-reactive protein (CRP) are uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic cessation strategies with standard of care in sepsis.

Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, ClinicalTrials.gov , and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials involving adults with sepsis in intensive care.

Data extraction: A systematic review with network meta-analyses was performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation method was used to assess certainty.

Data synthesis: Eighteen studies involving 5023 participants were included. Procalcitonin-guided and CRP-guided strategies shortened antibiotic treatment (-1.89 days [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.47], -2.56 days [95% CI, -4.21 to -0.91]) with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In procalcitonin-guided strategies, this benefit was consistent even in subsets with shorter baseline antimicrobial duration (7-10 d) or in Sepsis-3, and more pronounced in procalcitonin cutoff of "0.5 μg/L and 80% reduction." No benefit was observed when monitoring frequency was less than half of the initial 10 days. Procalcitonin-guided strategies lowered mortality (-27 per 1000 participants [95% CI, -45 to -7]) and this was pronounced in Sepsis-3, but CRP-guided strategies led to no difference in mortality. Recurrence did not increase significantly with either strategy (very low to low certainty).

Conclusions: In sepsis, procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategies may be beneficial and safe. In particular, the usefulness of procalcitonin guidance for current Sepsis-3, where antimicrobials are used for more than 7 days, was supported. Well-designed studies are needed focusing on monitoring protocol and recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
An International Factorial Vignette-Based Survey of Intubation Decisions in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning Tool With Treatment Protocol on Hypotension During Cardiac Surgery and ICU Stay: The Hypotension Prediction 2 (HYPE-2) Randomized Clinical Trial. Intestinal Drug Absorption After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Elective Neurosurgery: Insights From Esomeprazole Pharmacokinetics. Ketamine Versus Etomidate for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report in Monitoring Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1