通过连续血糖监测评估糖尿病周围神经病变和血糖变异性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111757
Yifan Jia , Dan Long , Yunshuang Yang , Qiong Wang , Qunli Wu , Qian Zhang
{"title":"通过连续血糖监测评估糖尿病周围神经病变和血糖变异性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yifan Jia ,&nbsp;Dan Long ,&nbsp;Yunshuang Yang ,&nbsp;Qiong Wang ,&nbsp;Qunli Wu ,&nbsp;Qian Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics have been used to accurately assess glycemic variability (GV) to facilitate management of diabetes mellitus, yet their relationship with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is not fully understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between GV metrics and the risk of developing DPN. Nine studies totaling 3,649 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. A significant association was found between increased GV, as indicated by metrics including standard deviation (SD) with OR and 95% CI of 2.58 (1.45–4.57), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) with OR and 95% CI of 1.90 (1.01–3.58), mean of daily difference (MODD) with OR and 95% CI of 2.88 (2.17–3.81) and the incidence of DPN. Our findings support a link between higher GV and an increased risk of DPN in patients with diabetes. These findings highlight the potential of GV metrics as indicators for the development of DPN, advocating for their inclusion in diabetes management strategies to potentially mitigate neuropathy risk. Longitudinal studies with longer observation periods and larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these associations across diverse populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yifan Jia ,&nbsp;Dan Long ,&nbsp;Yunshuang Yang ,&nbsp;Qiong Wang ,&nbsp;Qunli Wu ,&nbsp;Qian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics have been used to accurately assess glycemic variability (GV) to facilitate management of diabetes mellitus, yet their relationship with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is not fully understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between GV metrics and the risk of developing DPN. Nine studies totaling 3,649 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. A significant association was found between increased GV, as indicated by metrics including standard deviation (SD) with OR and 95% CI of 2.58 (1.45–4.57), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) with OR and 95% CI of 1.90 (1.01–3.58), mean of daily difference (MODD) with OR and 95% CI of 2.88 (2.17–3.81) and the incidence of DPN. Our findings support a link between higher GV and an increased risk of DPN in patients with diabetes. These findings highlight the potential of GV metrics as indicators for the development of DPN, advocating for their inclusion in diabetes management strategies to potentially mitigate neuropathy risk. Longitudinal studies with longer observation periods and larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these associations across diverse populations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724006673\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822724006673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

连续血糖监测(CGM)得出的指标已被用于准确评估血糖变异性(GV),以促进糖尿病的管理,但它们与糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的关系尚未完全明了。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估 GV 指标与 DPN 发病风险之间的关系。九项研究共纳入了 3,649 名 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者。研究发现,GV(包括标准偏差 (SD)、血糖偏移平均振幅 (MAGE)、日差平均值 (MODD))的增加与 DPN 的发生率有明显的关系,其中标准偏差 (SD)的 OR 和 95% CI 为 2.58(1.45-4.57),血糖偏移平均振幅 (MAGE)的 OR 和 95% CI 为 1.90(1.01-3.58),日差平均值 (MODD) 的 OR 和 95% CI 为 2.88(2.17-3.81)。我们的研究结果表明,血压升高与糖尿病患者罹患 DPN 的风险增加之间存在联系。这些发现凸显了 GV 指标作为 DPN 发展指标的潜力,主张将其纳入糖尿病管理策略,以降低神经病变风险。有必要进行观察期更长、样本量更大的纵向研究,以便在不同人群中验证这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived metrics have been used to accurately assess glycemic variability (GV) to facilitate management of diabetes mellitus, yet their relationship with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is not fully understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between GV metrics and the risk of developing DPN. Nine studies totaling 3,649 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. A significant association was found between increased GV, as indicated by metrics including standard deviation (SD) with OR and 95% CI of 2.58 (1.45–4.57), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) with OR and 95% CI of 1.90 (1.01–3.58), mean of daily difference (MODD) with OR and 95% CI of 2.88 (2.17–3.81) and the incidence of DPN. Our findings support a link between higher GV and an increased risk of DPN in patients with diabetes. These findings highlight the potential of GV metrics as indicators for the development of DPN, advocating for their inclusion in diabetes management strategies to potentially mitigate neuropathy risk. Longitudinal studies with longer observation periods and larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these associations across diverse populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Computed tomography-based body composition indicative of diabetes after hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in relation to body composition, estimated insulin sensitivity and arterial stiffness in adults with type 1 diabetes Role of microRNAs in diabetic foot ulcers: Mechanisms and possible interventions Early life socioeconomic inequalities and type 2 diabetes incidence: Longitudinal analyses in the Maastricht study Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1