大流行头 18 个月期间数字工具和新兴设备在 COVID-19 接触者追踪中的作用:系统性综述。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae039
Brigid Unim, Irisa Zile-Velika, Zane Pavlovska, Luis Lapao, Mariana Peyroteo, Janis Misins, Maria João Forjaz, Paulo Nogueira, Tiziana Grisetti, Luigi Palmieri
{"title":"大流行头 18 个月期间数字工具和新兴设备在 COVID-19 接触者追踪中的作用:系统性综述。","authors":"Brigid Unim, Irisa Zile-Velika, Zane Pavlovska, Luis Lapao, Mariana Peyroteo, Janis Misins, Maria João Forjaz, Paulo Nogueira, Tiziana Grisetti, Luigi Palmieri","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contact tracing is a public health intervention implemented in synergy with other preventive measures to curb epidemics, like the coronavirus pandemic. The development and use of digital devices have increased worldwide to enhance the contact tracing process. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of tracking coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients using digital solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies on digital contact tracing (DCT), published 2020-21, in English were identified through a systematic literature review performed on nine online databases. An ad hoc form was used for data extraction of relevant information. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed with validated tools. A qualitative synthesis of the findings is reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 8000 records were identified and 37 were included in the study: 24 modelling and 13 population-based studies. DCT improved the identification of close contacts of COVID-19 cases and reduced the effective reproduction number of COVID-19-related infections and deaths by over 60%. It impacted positively on societal and economic costs, in terms of lockdowns and use of resources, including staffing. Privacy and security issues were reported in 27 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCT contributed to curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, especially with the high uptake rate of the devices and in combination with other public health measures, especially conventional contact tracing. The main barriers to the implementation of the devices are uptake rate, security and privacy issues. Public health digitalization and contact tracing are the keys to countries' emergency preparedness for future health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":"34 Supplement_1","pages":"i11-i28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11215323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Brigid Unim, Irisa Zile-Velika, Zane Pavlovska, Luis Lapao, Mariana Peyroteo, Janis Misins, Maria João Forjaz, Paulo Nogueira, Tiziana Grisetti, Luigi Palmieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurpub/ckae039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contact tracing is a public health intervention implemented in synergy with other preventive measures to curb epidemics, like the coronavirus pandemic. The development and use of digital devices have increased worldwide to enhance the contact tracing process. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of tracking coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients using digital solutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational studies on digital contact tracing (DCT), published 2020-21, in English were identified through a systematic literature review performed on nine online databases. An ad hoc form was used for data extraction of relevant information. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed with validated tools. A qualitative synthesis of the findings is reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 8000 records were identified and 37 were included in the study: 24 modelling and 13 population-based studies. DCT improved the identification of close contacts of COVID-19 cases and reduced the effective reproduction number of COVID-19-related infections and deaths by over 60%. It impacted positively on societal and economic costs, in terms of lockdowns and use of resources, including staffing. Privacy and security issues were reported in 27 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCT contributed to curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, especially with the high uptake rate of the devices and in combination with other public health measures, especially conventional contact tracing. The main barriers to the implementation of the devices are uptake rate, security and privacy issues. Public health digitalization and contact tracing are the keys to countries' emergency preparedness for future health crises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"34 Supplement_1\",\"pages\":\"i11-i28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11215323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:接触者追踪是一项公共卫生干预措施,它与其他预防措施协同实施,以遏制流行病,如冠状病毒大流行。为加强接触者追踪过程,全球范围内开发和使用的数字设备越来越多。本研究旨在评估使用数字解决方案追踪 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的有效性和影响:通过对九个在线数据库进行系统性文献回顾,确定了 2020-21 年发表的有关数字接触追踪(DCT)的英文观察性研究。在提取相关信息时使用了临时表格。采用经过验证的工具对纳入的研究进行了质量评估。报告对研究结果进行了定性综合:共发现 8000 多条记录,37 项纳入研究:24 项建模研究和 13 项基于人群的研究。DCT 提高了对 COVID-19 病例密切接触者的识别率,并将 COVID-19 相关感染和死亡的有效繁殖数量降低了 60% 以上。在封锁和资源使用(包括人员配备)方面,它对社会和经济成本产生了积极影响。有 27 项研究报告了隐私和安全问题:DCT为遏制COVID-19大流行做出了贡献,特别是该设备的高使用率以及与其他公共卫生措施(尤其是传统的接触者追踪)的结合。该设备实施的主要障碍是使用率、安全性和隐私问题。公共卫生数字化和接触者追踪是各国为未来卫生危机做好应急准备的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of digital tools and emerging devices in COVID-19 contact tracing during the first 18 months of the pandemic: a systematic review.

Background: Contact tracing is a public health intervention implemented in synergy with other preventive measures to curb epidemics, like the coronavirus pandemic. The development and use of digital devices have increased worldwide to enhance the contact tracing process. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of tracking coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients using digital solutions.

Methods: Observational studies on digital contact tracing (DCT), published 2020-21, in English were identified through a systematic literature review performed on nine online databases. An ad hoc form was used for data extraction of relevant information. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed with validated tools. A qualitative synthesis of the findings is reported.

Results: Over 8000 records were identified and 37 were included in the study: 24 modelling and 13 population-based studies. DCT improved the identification of close contacts of COVID-19 cases and reduced the effective reproduction number of COVID-19-related infections and deaths by over 60%. It impacted positively on societal and economic costs, in terms of lockdowns and use of resources, including staffing. Privacy and security issues were reported in 27 studies.

Conclusions: DCT contributed to curbing the COVID-19 pandemic, especially with the high uptake rate of the devices and in combination with other public health measures, especially conventional contact tracing. The main barriers to the implementation of the devices are uptake rate, security and privacy issues. Public health digitalization and contact tracing are the keys to countries' emergency preparedness for future health crises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
Access points to different levels of health care over 13 years. Utilization behaviour in a changing health care system. Results of a three-wave cross-sectional series in Austria. Causal association of physical activity with lymphoma risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Public health approaches to 'Leave No One Behind' in heatwave resilience: insights from the UK. Intermarriage and mortality among Finnish migrants in Sweden: a prospective register study using binational data. Lessons learned from Taiwan's response to the COVID-19 pandemic: successes, challenges, and implications for future pandemics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1