围手术期自由饮水管理可促进妇科腹腔镜手术后胃肠功能的恢复:随机对照试验。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111539
Beibei Wang MD , Dong Han MD , Xinyue Hu MD , Jing Chen MD , Yuwei Liu , Jing Wu MD, PhD
{"title":"围手术期自由饮水管理可促进妇科腹腔镜手术后胃肠功能的恢复:随机对照试验。","authors":"Beibei Wang MD ,&nbsp;Dong Han MD ,&nbsp;Xinyue Hu MD ,&nbsp;Jing Chen MD ,&nbsp;Yuwei Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Wu MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the effect of perioperative liberal drinking management, including preoperative carbohydrate loading (PCL) given 2 h before surgery and early oral feeding (EOF) at 6 h postoperatively, in enhancing postoperative gastrointestinal function and improving outcomes in gynecologic patients. The hypotheses are that the perioperative liberal drinking management accelerates the recovery of gastrointestinal function, enhances dietary tolerance throughout hospitalization, and ultimately reduces the length of hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A prospective randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Operating room and gynecological ward in Wuhan Union Hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>We enrolled 210 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and 157 patients were included in the final analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups, including the control, PCL, and PCL-EOF groups. The anesthetists and follow-up staff were blinded to group assignment.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the postoperative Intake, Feeling nauseated, Emesis, Examination, and Duration of symptoms (I-FEED) score (range 0 to 14, higher scores worse). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of I-FEED scores &gt;2, and other additional indicators to monitor postoperative gastrointestinal function, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, time to feces Bristol grade 3–4, and time to tolerate diet. Additionally, we collected other ERAS recovery indicators, including the incidence of PONV, complications, postoperative pain score, satisfaction score, and the quality of postoperative functional recovery at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The PCL-EOF exhibited significantly enhanced gastrointestinal function recovery compared to control group and PCL group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), with the lower I-FEED score (<em>PCL: 0[0,1] vs. PCL-EOF: 0[0,0] vs. control: 1[0,2]</em>) and the reduced incidence of I-FEED &gt;2 <em>(PCL:8% vs. PCL-EOF: 2% vs. control:21%).</em> Compared to the control, the intervention of PCL-EOF protected patients from the incidence of I-FEED score &gt; 2 <em>[HR:0.09, 95%CI (0.01–0.72), p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.023]</em>, and was beneficial in promoting the patient's postoperative first flatus <em>[PCL-EOF: HR:3.33, 95%CI (2.14–5.19),p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, first defecation <em>[PCL-EOF: HR:2.76, 95%CI (1.83–4.16), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, Bristol feces grade 3–4 <em>[PCL-EOF: HR:3.65, 95%CI (2.36–5.63), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, first fluid diet<em>[PCL-EOF: HR:2.76, 95%CI (1.83–4.16), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, and first normal diet<em>[PCL-EOF: HR:6.63, 95%CI (4.18–10.50), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>. Also, the length of postoperative hospital stay <em>(PCL-EOF: 5d vs. PCL: 6d and control: 6d, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, the total cost <em>(PCL-EOF: 25052</em> <em>±</em> <em>3650y vs. PCL: 27914</em> <em>±</em> <em>4684y and control: 26799</em> <em>±</em> <em>4775y, p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.005)</em>, and postoperative VAS pain score values [POD0 <em>(PCL-EOF: 2 vs. control: 4 vs. PCL: 4, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, POD1 <em>(PCL-EOF: 1 vs. control: 3 vs. PCL: 2, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, POD2 <em>(PCL-EOF: 1 vs. control:2 vs. PCL: 1, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, POD3 <em>(PCL-EOF: 0 vs. control: 1 vs. PCL: 1, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>] were significantly reduced in PCL-EOF group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our primary endpoint, I-FEED score demonstrated significant reduction with perioperative liberal drinking, serving as a protective intervention against I-FEED&gt;2. Gastrointestinal recovery metrics, such as time to first flatus and defecation, also showed substantial improvements. Furthermore, the intervention enhanced postoperative dietary tolerance and expedited early recovery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration</strong>: ChiCTR2300071047(<span>https://www.chictr.org.cn/</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative liberal drinking management promotes postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Beibei Wang MD ,&nbsp;Dong Han MD ,&nbsp;Xinyue Hu MD ,&nbsp;Jing Chen MD ,&nbsp;Yuwei Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Wu MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate the effect of perioperative liberal drinking management, including preoperative carbohydrate loading (PCL) given 2 h before surgery and early oral feeding (EOF) at 6 h postoperatively, in enhancing postoperative gastrointestinal function and improving outcomes in gynecologic patients. The hypotheses are that the perioperative liberal drinking management accelerates the recovery of gastrointestinal function, enhances dietary tolerance throughout hospitalization, and ultimately reduces the length of hospitalization.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A prospective randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Operating room and gynecological ward in Wuhan Union Hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>We enrolled 210 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and 157 patients were included in the final analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups, including the control, PCL, and PCL-EOF groups. The anesthetists and follow-up staff were blinded to group assignment.</p></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><p>The primary outcome was the postoperative Intake, Feeling nauseated, Emesis, Examination, and Duration of symptoms (I-FEED) score (range 0 to 14, higher scores worse). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of I-FEED scores &gt;2, and other additional indicators to monitor postoperative gastrointestinal function, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, time to feces Bristol grade 3–4, and time to tolerate diet. Additionally, we collected other ERAS recovery indicators, including the incidence of PONV, complications, postoperative pain score, satisfaction score, and the quality of postoperative functional recovery at discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The PCL-EOF exhibited significantly enhanced gastrointestinal function recovery compared to control group and PCL group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), with the lower I-FEED score (<em>PCL: 0[0,1] vs. PCL-EOF: 0[0,0] vs. control: 1[0,2]</em>) and the reduced incidence of I-FEED &gt;2 <em>(PCL:8% vs. PCL-EOF: 2% vs. control:21%).</em> Compared to the control, the intervention of PCL-EOF protected patients from the incidence of I-FEED score &gt; 2 <em>[HR:0.09, 95%CI (0.01–0.72), p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.023]</em>, and was beneficial in promoting the patient's postoperative first flatus <em>[PCL-EOF: HR:3.33, 95%CI (2.14–5.19),p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, first defecation <em>[PCL-EOF: HR:2.76, 95%CI (1.83–4.16), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, Bristol feces grade 3–4 <em>[PCL-EOF: HR:3.65, 95%CI (2.36–5.63), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, first fluid diet<em>[PCL-EOF: HR:2.76, 95%CI (1.83–4.16), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>, and first normal diet<em>[PCL-EOF: HR:6.63, 95%CI (4.18–10.50), p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001]</em>. Also, the length of postoperative hospital stay <em>(PCL-EOF: 5d vs. PCL: 6d and control: 6d, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, the total cost <em>(PCL-EOF: 25052</em> <em>±</em> <em>3650y vs. PCL: 27914</em> <em>±</em> <em>4684y and control: 26799</em> <em>±</em> <em>4775y, p</em> <em>=</em> <em>0.005)</em>, and postoperative VAS pain score values [POD0 <em>(PCL-EOF: 2 vs. control: 4 vs. PCL: 4, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, POD1 <em>(PCL-EOF: 1 vs. control: 3 vs. PCL: 2, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, POD2 <em>(PCL-EOF: 1 vs. control:2 vs. PCL: 1, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>, POD3 <em>(PCL-EOF: 0 vs. control: 1 vs. PCL: 1, p</em> <em>&lt;</em> <em>0.001)</em>] were significantly reduced in PCL-EOF group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our primary endpoint, I-FEED score demonstrated significant reduction with perioperative liberal drinking, serving as a protective intervention against I-FEED&gt;2. Gastrointestinal recovery metrics, such as time to first flatus and defecation, also showed substantial improvements. Furthermore, the intervention enhanced postoperative dietary tolerance and expedited early recovery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration</strong>: ChiCTR2300071047(<span>https://www.chictr.org.cn/</span><svg><path></path></svg>).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024001685\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024001685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估围手术期自由饮水管理(包括术前 2 小时给予碳水化合物负荷(PCL)和术后 6 小时早期口服喂养(EOF))在增强妇科患者术后胃肠道功能和改善预后方面的效果。假设围手术期的自由饮水管理可加速胃肠功能的恢复,提高住院期间的饮食耐受性,并最终缩短住院时间:前瞻性随机对照试验:地点:武汉协和医院手术室和妇科病房:我们招募了210名接受妇科腹腔镜手术的患者,最终分析纳入了157名患者:患者按1:1:1的比例随机分为三组,包括对照组、PCL组和PCL-EOF组。麻醉师和随访人员对组别分配保持盲目:主要结果是术后摄入、恶心、呕吐、检查和症状持续时间(I-FEED)评分(范围为 0-14 分,分数越高,情况越糟)。次要结果包括 I-FEED 评分大于 2 分的发生率,以及监测术后胃肠功能的其他指标,包括首次排气时间、首次排便时间、布里斯托尔 3-4 级粪便时间和耐受饮食时间。此外,我们还收集了其他ERAS恢复指标,包括PONV发生率、并发症、术后疼痛评分、满意度评分和出院时术后功能恢复质量:主要结果:与对照组和 PCL 组相比,PCL-EOF 的胃肠功能恢复明显提高(P 2(PCL:8% vs. PCL-EOF:2% vs. 对照组:21%)。与对照组相比,PCL-EOF的干预保护了患者I-FEED评分>2的发生率[HR:0.09, 95%CI (0.01-0.72), p = 0.023],并有利于促进患者术后首次排气[PCL-EOF: HR:3.33, 95%CI (2.14-5.19), p 结论:我们的主要终点 I-FEED 评分显示,围手术期自由饮水可显著降低 I-FEED 评分,作为一种保护性干预措施,可防止 I-FEED>2 分。 胃肠道恢复指标,如首次排气和排便时间,也有显著改善。此外,干预措施还提高了术后饮食耐受性,加快了早期恢复:试验注册:ChiCTR2300071047(https://www.chictr.org.cn/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative liberal drinking management promotes postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objective

This study aims to evaluate the effect of perioperative liberal drinking management, including preoperative carbohydrate loading (PCL) given 2 h before surgery and early oral feeding (EOF) at 6 h postoperatively, in enhancing postoperative gastrointestinal function and improving outcomes in gynecologic patients. The hypotheses are that the perioperative liberal drinking management accelerates the recovery of gastrointestinal function, enhances dietary tolerance throughout hospitalization, and ultimately reduces the length of hospitalization.

Design

A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Operating room and gynecological ward in Wuhan Union Hospital.

Patients

We enrolled 210 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery, and 157 patients were included in the final analysis.

Interventions

Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups, including the control, PCL, and PCL-EOF groups. The anesthetists and follow-up staff were blinded to group assignment.

Measurements

The primary outcome was the postoperative Intake, Feeling nauseated, Emesis, Examination, and Duration of symptoms (I-FEED) score (range 0 to 14, higher scores worse). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of I-FEED scores >2, and other additional indicators to monitor postoperative gastrointestinal function, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, time to feces Bristol grade 3–4, and time to tolerate diet. Additionally, we collected other ERAS recovery indicators, including the incidence of PONV, complications, postoperative pain score, satisfaction score, and the quality of postoperative functional recovery at discharge.

Main results

The PCL-EOF exhibited significantly enhanced gastrointestinal function recovery compared to control group and PCL group (p < 0.05), with the lower I-FEED score (PCL: 0[0,1] vs. PCL-EOF: 0[0,0] vs. control: 1[0,2]) and the reduced incidence of I-FEED >2 (PCL:8% vs. PCL-EOF: 2% vs. control:21%). Compared to the control, the intervention of PCL-EOF protected patients from the incidence of I-FEED score > 2 [HR:0.09, 95%CI (0.01–0.72), p = 0.023], and was beneficial in promoting the patient's postoperative first flatus [PCL-EOF: HR:3.33, 95%CI (2.14–5.19),p < 0.001], first defecation [PCL-EOF: HR:2.76, 95%CI (1.83–4.16), p < 0.001], Bristol feces grade 3–4 [PCL-EOF: HR:3.65, 95%CI (2.36–5.63), p < 0.001], first fluid diet[PCL-EOF: HR:2.76, 95%CI (1.83–4.16), p < 0.001], and first normal diet[PCL-EOF: HR:6.63, 95%CI (4.18–10.50), p < 0.001]. Also, the length of postoperative hospital stay (PCL-EOF: 5d vs. PCL: 6d and control: 6d, p < 0.001), the total cost (PCL-EOF: 25052 ± 3650y vs. PCL: 27914 ± 4684y and control: 26799 ± 4775y, p = 0.005), and postoperative VAS pain score values [POD0 (PCL-EOF: 2 vs. control: 4 vs. PCL: 4, p < 0.001), POD1 (PCL-EOF: 1 vs. control: 3 vs. PCL: 2, p < 0.001), POD2 (PCL-EOF: 1 vs. control:2 vs. PCL: 1, p < 0.001), POD3 (PCL-EOF: 0 vs. control: 1 vs. PCL: 1, p < 0.001)] were significantly reduced in PCL-EOF group.

Conclusions

Our primary endpoint, I-FEED score demonstrated significant reduction with perioperative liberal drinking, serving as a protective intervention against I-FEED>2. Gastrointestinal recovery metrics, such as time to first flatus and defecation, also showed substantial improvements. Furthermore, the intervention enhanced postoperative dietary tolerance and expedited early recovery.

Trial registration: ChiCTR2300071047(https://www.chictr.org.cn/).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine on cognitive function following noncardiac surgery: An updated meta-analysis. Esketamine in postoperative recovery: Reliable for negative emotional relief, ambiguous for cognitive function. National trends in perioperative epidural analgesia use for surgical patients Response to comment on: “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial” Letter to the editor regarding “Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1