机械化学消融术后的静脉直径、肥胖程度和再通率。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101935
{"title":"机械化学消融术后的静脉直径、肥胖程度和再通率。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>A large vein diameter is associated with higher recanalization rates after endovenous thermal ablation procedures of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV). However, relatively few studies have explored the relationship between vein diameter and recanalization rates after mechanochemical ablation (MOCA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with chronic venous insufficiency who underwent MOCA of the GSV or SSV from 2017 to 2021 at a single hospital. Patients with no follow-up ultrasound examination were excluded. Patients were classified as having a large (≥1 cm) or small (&lt;1 cm) treated vein. The primary outcomes were 2-year recanalization and reintervention of the treated segment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 186 MOCA procedures during the study period were analyzed. There was no differences in age, gender, history of venous thromboembolic events, use of anticoagulation, obesity, or length of treated segment between the cohorts. Patients with large veins were less likely to have stasis ulcers compared with those with small veins (3.2% vs 21.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .05 on Fisher exact test). Patients with large veins had a higher incidence of postoperative local complications (24.2% vs 7.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .05 on χ<sup>2</sup> test). A survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards showed no significant difference in recanalization rates with larger vein diameters. However, obesity was found to correlate significantly with recanalization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A large vein diameter was not associated with higher recanalization rates after MOCA of the GSVs and SSVs. However, obesity was found to correlate with recanalization rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","volume":"12 6","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vein diameter, obesity, and rates of recanalization after mechanochemical ablation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>A large vein diameter is associated with higher recanalization rates after endovenous thermal ablation procedures of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV). However, relatively few studies have explored the relationship between vein diameter and recanalization rates after mechanochemical ablation (MOCA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with chronic venous insufficiency who underwent MOCA of the GSV or SSV from 2017 to 2021 at a single hospital. Patients with no follow-up ultrasound examination were excluded. Patients were classified as having a large (≥1 cm) or small (&lt;1 cm) treated vein. The primary outcomes were 2-year recanalization and reintervention of the treated segment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 186 MOCA procedures during the study period were analyzed. There was no differences in age, gender, history of venous thromboembolic events, use of anticoagulation, obesity, or length of treated segment between the cohorts. Patients with large veins were less likely to have stasis ulcers compared with those with small veins (3.2% vs 21.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .05 on Fisher exact test). Patients with large veins had a higher incidence of postoperative local complications (24.2% vs 7.2%, <em>P</em> &lt; .05 on χ<sup>2</sup> test). A survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards showed no significant difference in recanalization rates with larger vein diameters. However, obesity was found to correlate significantly with recanalization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A large vein diameter was not associated with higher recanalization rates after MOCA of the GSVs and SSVs. However, obesity was found to correlate with recanalization rates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X2400297X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213333X2400297X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:和目标:静脉直径大与大隐静脉和小隐静脉静脉腔内热消融术后较高的再通率有关。然而,探讨静脉直径与机械化学消融术(MOCA)后再通率之间关系的研究相对较少:我们对 2017-2021 年在一家医院接受大隐静脉或小隐静脉机械化学消融术的慢性静脉功能不全患者进行了回顾性研究。未进行后续超声检查的患者被排除在外。患者被分为大(≥ 1 厘米)或小(< 1 厘米)治疗静脉。主要结果是治疗段的2年再通畅率和再介入率:结果:研究期间共分析了186例MOCA手术。各组患者的年龄、性别、静脉血栓栓塞病史、抗凝药物使用情况、肥胖程度或治疗段长度均无差异。与小静脉患者相比,大静脉患者发生瘀血溃疡的几率较低(3.2% vs 21.5%;P结论:静脉直径大与大隐静脉和小隐静脉MOCA术后较高的再通率无关。不过,肥胖与再通率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vein diameter, obesity, and rates of recanalization after mechanochemical ablation

Objective

A large vein diameter is associated with higher recanalization rates after endovenous thermal ablation procedures of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV). However, relatively few studies have explored the relationship between vein diameter and recanalization rates after mechanochemical ablation (MOCA).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with chronic venous insufficiency who underwent MOCA of the GSV or SSV from 2017 to 2021 at a single hospital. Patients with no follow-up ultrasound examination were excluded. Patients were classified as having a large (≥1 cm) or small (<1 cm) treated vein. The primary outcomes were 2-year recanalization and reintervention of the treated segment.

Results

A total of 186 MOCA procedures during the study period were analyzed. There was no differences in age, gender, history of venous thromboembolic events, use of anticoagulation, obesity, or length of treated segment between the cohorts. Patients with large veins were less likely to have stasis ulcers compared with those with small veins (3.2% vs 21.5%; P < .05 on Fisher exact test). Patients with large veins had a higher incidence of postoperative local complications (24.2% vs 7.2%, P < .05 on χ2 test). A survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards showed no significant difference in recanalization rates with larger vein diameters. However, obesity was found to correlate significantly with recanalization.

Conclusions

A large vein diameter was not associated with higher recanalization rates after MOCA of the GSVs and SSVs. However, obesity was found to correlate with recanalization rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders SURGERYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE&n-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
328
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders is one of a series of specialist journals launched by the Journal of Vascular Surgery. It aims to be the premier international Journal of medical, endovascular and surgical management of venous and lymphatic disorders. It publishes high quality clinical, research, case reports, techniques, and practice manuscripts related to all aspects of venous and lymphatic disorders, including malformations and wound care, with an emphasis on the practicing clinician. The journal seeks to provide novel and timely information to vascular surgeons, interventionalists, phlebologists, wound care specialists, and allied health professionals who treat patients presenting with vascular and lymphatic disorders. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of these organizations and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
Long-term Outcomes of Stenting Superior Cava and Brachio-cephalic Vein Occlusion in Hemodialysis Patients with Arteriovenous Fistulas. EFFICACY OF COMPLEX DECONGESTIVE THERAPY ON VENOUS FLOW, INTERNAL SAPHENOUS DIAMETER, EDEMA, FAT MASS OF THE LIMBS AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. Residual popliteal vein thrombosis after endovascular treatment of mixed-type lower extremity deep vein thrombosis is relevant to post-thrombotic syndrome. Comparative Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Simultaneous and Staged Bilateral Saphenous Vein Radiofrequency Ablation. In-human clinical experience with direct stick embolization of low-flow vascular malformations using a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1