通过电话为痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者提供以解决方案为重点的简短策略:阿尔茨海默氏症协会全国帮助热线。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging & Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1080/13607863.2024.2369652
Nancy A Hodgson, Sonia Talwar, Liming Huang, Kerry Finegan, Beth A Kallmyer, Sam Fazio
{"title":"通过电话为痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者提供以解决方案为重点的简短策略:阿尔茨海默氏症协会全国帮助热线。","authors":"Nancy A Hodgson, Sonia Talwar, Liming Huang, Kerry Finegan, Beth A Kallmyer, Sam Fazio","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2024.2369652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nearly 75% of persons living with dementia (PLWD) in the US live at home and are cared for by informal family members who have limited access to supportive and accessible services, indicating an increased need for these types of services (Alzheimer's Association, 2023). The Alzheimer's Association call centers offer free telephone care consultations, but it currently remains unclear which types of brief telephone support benefit caregivers. This study compares outcomes of participants who received traditional care consultation calls via the Alzheimer's Association National Helpline with care consultation calls from Helpline staff trained in Solution-Focused Brief Strategies (SFBS), a client-centered evidence- and resource-based approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sequential callers were randomly assigned to the \"traditional\" or \"SFBS\" care consultation groups and were assessed at the time of call (baseline) and post-call (T1). The outcomes of interest were general self-efficacy (GSE), self-efficacy in managing emotions (PROMIS), caregiver mastery, therapeutic alliance, and goal setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of over 500 callers, callers receiving the SFBS scored higher on therapeutic alliance and goal-setting metrics, such as greater sense of collaboration on goals (effect size = 0.280, <i>p</i> = 0.0005, significant with Bonferroni correction), mutual agreement with care consultant on goals (effect size = 0.418, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, significant with Bonferroni correction), and believing the way the problem was resolved was correct (effect size = 0.286, <i>p</i> = 0.0007, significant with Bonferroni correction) than those receiving the traditional care consultation. Both groups reported improvements in the PROMIS measure, but there were no differences between groups. There were no significant differences in GSE or caregiver mastery scores between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of the integration of SFBS in dementia care consultation calls as part of telephone-based supportive services for dementia caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the solution-focused brief strategies via telephone for family caregivers of persons with dementia: the Alzheimer's Association National Helpline.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy A Hodgson, Sonia Talwar, Liming Huang, Kerry Finegan, Beth A Kallmyer, Sam Fazio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13607863.2024.2369652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nearly 75% of persons living with dementia (PLWD) in the US live at home and are cared for by informal family members who have limited access to supportive and accessible services, indicating an increased need for these types of services (Alzheimer's Association, 2023). The Alzheimer's Association call centers offer free telephone care consultations, but it currently remains unclear which types of brief telephone support benefit caregivers. This study compares outcomes of participants who received traditional care consultation calls via the Alzheimer's Association National Helpline with care consultation calls from Helpline staff trained in Solution-Focused Brief Strategies (SFBS), a client-centered evidence- and resource-based approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sequential callers were randomly assigned to the \\\"traditional\\\" or \\\"SFBS\\\" care consultation groups and were assessed at the time of call (baseline) and post-call (T1). The outcomes of interest were general self-efficacy (GSE), self-efficacy in managing emotions (PROMIS), caregiver mastery, therapeutic alliance, and goal setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of over 500 callers, callers receiving the SFBS scored higher on therapeutic alliance and goal-setting metrics, such as greater sense of collaboration on goals (effect size = 0.280, <i>p</i> = 0.0005, significant with Bonferroni correction), mutual agreement with care consultant on goals (effect size = 0.418, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, significant with Bonferroni correction), and believing the way the problem was resolved was correct (effect size = 0.286, <i>p</i> = 0.0007, significant with Bonferroni correction) than those receiving the traditional care consultation. Both groups reported improvements in the PROMIS measure, but there were no differences between groups. There were no significant differences in GSE or caregiver mastery scores between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of the integration of SFBS in dementia care consultation calls as part of telephone-based supportive services for dementia caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging & Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging & Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2369652\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2369652","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在美国,近 75% 的痴呆症患者(PLWD)生活在家中,由非正式家庭成员照顾,他们获得支持性和无障碍服务的机会有限,这表明对这些类型服务的需求日益增加(阿尔茨海默氏症协会,2023 年)。阿尔茨海默氏症协会呼叫中心提供免费的电话护理咨询,但目前仍不清楚哪种类型的简短电话支持对护理者有益。本研究比较了通过阿尔茨海默氏症协会全国求助热线接受传统护理咨询电话的参与者与接受过以客户为中心、以证据和资源为基础的方法--"焦点解决简要策略"(SFBS)培训的求助热线工作人员所提供的护理咨询电话的结果:顺序呼叫者被随机分配到 "传统 "或 "SFBS "护理咨询组,并在呼叫时(基线)和呼叫后(T1)接受评估。评估结果包括一般自我效能感(GSE)、情绪管理自我效能感(PROMIS)、照顾者掌握程度、治疗联盟和目标设定:在 500 多位来电者中,与接受传统护理咨询的人相比,接受 SFBS 的来电者在治疗联盟和目标设定指标上得分更高,如在目标上有更强的合作意识(效应大小 = 0.280,P = 0.0005,经 Bonferroni 校正后显著),与护理顾问在目标上达成共识(效应大小 = 0.418,P = 0.0007,经 Bonferroni 校正后显著)。两组患者的 PROMIS 指标均有所改善,但组间无差异。各组间的 GSE 或护理人员掌握程度评分无明显差异:本研究为将 SFBS 纳入痴呆症护理咨询电话作为痴呆症护理人员电话支持服务的一部分的有效性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of the solution-focused brief strategies via telephone for family caregivers of persons with dementia: the Alzheimer's Association National Helpline.

Objectives: Nearly 75% of persons living with dementia (PLWD) in the US live at home and are cared for by informal family members who have limited access to supportive and accessible services, indicating an increased need for these types of services (Alzheimer's Association, 2023). The Alzheimer's Association call centers offer free telephone care consultations, but it currently remains unclear which types of brief telephone support benefit caregivers. This study compares outcomes of participants who received traditional care consultation calls via the Alzheimer's Association National Helpline with care consultation calls from Helpline staff trained in Solution-Focused Brief Strategies (SFBS), a client-centered evidence- and resource-based approach.

Method: Sequential callers were randomly assigned to the "traditional" or "SFBS" care consultation groups and were assessed at the time of call (baseline) and post-call (T1). The outcomes of interest were general self-efficacy (GSE), self-efficacy in managing emotions (PROMIS), caregiver mastery, therapeutic alliance, and goal setting.

Results: Of over 500 callers, callers receiving the SFBS scored higher on therapeutic alliance and goal-setting metrics, such as greater sense of collaboration on goals (effect size = 0.280, p = 0.0005, significant with Bonferroni correction), mutual agreement with care consultant on goals (effect size = 0.418, p < 0.0001, significant with Bonferroni correction), and believing the way the problem was resolved was correct (effect size = 0.286, p = 0.0007, significant with Bonferroni correction) than those receiving the traditional care consultation. Both groups reported improvements in the PROMIS measure, but there were no differences between groups. There were no significant differences in GSE or caregiver mastery scores between groups.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of the integration of SFBS in dementia care consultation calls as part of telephone-based supportive services for dementia caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
期刊最新文献
"I think we just saw happier residents": nursing home provider reported readiness assessment of the individualized positive psychosocial interaction (IPPI) program. ‘Mental health is a mystery’: patient perspectives on treatment engagement in the referral process to specialty geriatric mental health services Successful aging and its relationship with mindfulness, self-compassion factors, and subjective well-being in older adults Feasibility of training family caregivers of people living with dementia online to deliver life review depression intervention at home. In the presence of death and dying: death attitudes and compassion fatigue among certified nursing assistants in skilled care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1