参与和行为机制是否支撑了 "少饮 "应用程序的有效性?

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES NPJ Digital Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1038/s41746-024-01169-7
Claire Garnett, Larisa-Maria Dinu, Melissa Oldham, Olga Perski, Gemma Loebenberg, Emma Beard, Colin Angus, Robyn Burton, Matt Field, Felix Greaves, Matthew Hickman, Eileen Kaner, Susan Michie, Marcus Munafò, Elena Pizzo, Jamie Brown
{"title":"参与和行为机制是否支撑了 \"少饮 \"应用程序的有效性?","authors":"Claire Garnett, Larisa-Maria Dinu, Melissa Oldham, Olga Perski, Gemma Loebenberg, Emma Beard, Colin Angus, Robyn Burton, Matt Field, Felix Greaves, Matthew Hickman, Eileen Kaner, Susan Michie, Marcus Munafò, Elena Pizzo, Jamie Brown","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01169-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a process evaluation of a large UK-based randomised controlled trial (RCT) (n = 5602) evaluating the effectiveness of recommending an alcohol reduction app, Drink Less, compared with usual digital care in reducing alcohol consumption in increasing and higher risk drinkers. The aim was to understand whether participants’ engagement (‘self-reported adherence’) and behavioural characteristics were mechanisms of action underpinning the effectiveness of Drink Less. Self-reported adherence with both digital tools was over 70% (Drink Less: 78.0%, 95% CI = 77.6–78.4; usual digital care: 71.5%, 95% CI = 71.0–71.9). Self-reported adherence to the intervention (average causal mediation effect [ACME] = −0.250, 95% CI = −0.42, −0.11) and self-monitoring behaviour (ACME = −0.235, 95% CI = −0.44, −0.03) both partially mediated the effect of the intervention (versus comparator) on alcohol reduction. Following the recommendation (self-reported adherence) and the tracking (self-monitoring behaviour) feature of the Drink Less app appear to be important mechanisms of action for alcohol reduction among increasing and higher risk drinkers.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01169-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do engagement and behavioural mechanisms underpin the effectiveness of the Drink Less app?\",\"authors\":\"Claire Garnett, Larisa-Maria Dinu, Melissa Oldham, Olga Perski, Gemma Loebenberg, Emma Beard, Colin Angus, Robyn Burton, Matt Field, Felix Greaves, Matthew Hickman, Eileen Kaner, Susan Michie, Marcus Munafò, Elena Pizzo, Jamie Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-024-01169-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a process evaluation of a large UK-based randomised controlled trial (RCT) (n = 5602) evaluating the effectiveness of recommending an alcohol reduction app, Drink Less, compared with usual digital care in reducing alcohol consumption in increasing and higher risk drinkers. The aim was to understand whether participants’ engagement (‘self-reported adherence’) and behavioural characteristics were mechanisms of action underpinning the effectiveness of Drink Less. Self-reported adherence with both digital tools was over 70% (Drink Less: 78.0%, 95% CI = 77.6–78.4; usual digital care: 71.5%, 95% CI = 71.0–71.9). Self-reported adherence to the intervention (average causal mediation effect [ACME] = −0.250, 95% CI = −0.42, −0.11) and self-monitoring behaviour (ACME = −0.235, 95% CI = −0.44, −0.03) both partially mediated the effect of the intervention (versus comparator) on alcohol reduction. Following the recommendation (self-reported adherence) and the tracking (self-monitoring behaviour) feature of the Drink Less app appear to be important mechanisms of action for alcohol reduction among increasing and higher risk drinkers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01169-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01169-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01169-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是对英国一项大型随机对照试验(RCT)(n = 5602)进行的过程评估,该试验评估了推荐一款名为 "少喝点 "的减酒应用程序与常规数字护理相比,在减少日益饮酒者和高风险饮酒者的饮酒量方面的效果。目的是了解参与者的参与度("自我报告的依从性")和行为特征是否是支持 "少喝点 "有效性的作用机制。两种数字工具的自报坚持率均超过70%(少喝一点:78.0%,95% CI = 77.6-78.4;常规数字护理:71.5%,95% CI = 71.0-71.9)。自我报告的干预坚持率(平均因果中介效应[ACME] = -0.250,95% CI = -0.42,-0.11)和自我监测行为(ACME = -0.235,95% CI = -0.44,-0.03)均部分中介了干预(相对于比较者)对减少饮酒的影响。少饮应用程序的推荐(自我报告的遵守情况)和跟踪(自我监控行为)功能似乎是对饮酒量增加和饮酒风险较高者进行减酒的重要作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do engagement and behavioural mechanisms underpin the effectiveness of the Drink Less app?
This is a process evaluation of a large UK-based randomised controlled trial (RCT) (n = 5602) evaluating the effectiveness of recommending an alcohol reduction app, Drink Less, compared with usual digital care in reducing alcohol consumption in increasing and higher risk drinkers. The aim was to understand whether participants’ engagement (‘self-reported adherence’) and behavioural characteristics were mechanisms of action underpinning the effectiveness of Drink Less. Self-reported adherence with both digital tools was over 70% (Drink Less: 78.0%, 95% CI = 77.6–78.4; usual digital care: 71.5%, 95% CI = 71.0–71.9). Self-reported adherence to the intervention (average causal mediation effect [ACME] = −0.250, 95% CI = −0.42, −0.11) and self-monitoring behaviour (ACME = −0.235, 95% CI = −0.44, −0.03) both partially mediated the effect of the intervention (versus comparator) on alcohol reduction. Following the recommendation (self-reported adherence) and the tracking (self-monitoring behaviour) feature of the Drink Less app appear to be important mechanisms of action for alcohol reduction among increasing and higher risk drinkers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
期刊最新文献
Automated decision making in Barrett’s oesophagus: development and deployment of a natural language processing tool The adaptation of a single institution diabetes care platform into a nationally available turnkey solution Deep learning based highly accurate transplanted bioengineered corneal equivalent thickness measurement using optical coherence tomography Artificial intelligence applied to coronary artery calcium scans (AI-CAC) significantly improves cardiovascular events prediction Bridging organ transcriptomics for advancing multiple organ toxicity assessment with a generative AI approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1