Stacey R. Finkelstein , Rohini Daraboina , Andrea Leschewski , Semhar Michael
{"title":"了解政府营养计划参与情况的机器学习(ML)方法","authors":"Stacey R. Finkelstein , Rohini Daraboina , Andrea Leschewski , Semhar Michael","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Machine Learning (ML) affords researchers tools to advance beyond research methods commonly employed in psychology, business, and public policy studies of federal nutrition programs and participant food decision-making. It is a sub domain of AI that is applied for feature extraction – a crucial step in decision making. These features are used in context-specific automated decisions resulting in predictive AI models. Whereas many prior studies rely on retrospective, static, “one-shot” decision-making in controlled laboratory environments, ML allows researchers to refine predictions about participation and food behaviors using large-scale datasets. We propose a case study using ML to predict an aspect of participation in a large, publicly funded nutrition education program (The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program). Participation has important downstream implications for diet quality, food security, and other important nutrition related decisions. We then suggest a process for validating the ML insights using qualitative research and survey data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101830"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning (ML) approach to understanding participation in government nutrition programs\",\"authors\":\"Stacey R. Finkelstein , Rohini Daraboina , Andrea Leschewski , Semhar Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Machine Learning (ML) affords researchers tools to advance beyond research methods commonly employed in psychology, business, and public policy studies of federal nutrition programs and participant food decision-making. It is a sub domain of AI that is applied for feature extraction – a crucial step in decision making. These features are used in context-specific automated decisions resulting in predictive AI models. Whereas many prior studies rely on retrospective, static, “one-shot” decision-making in controlled laboratory environments, ML allows researchers to refine predictions about participation and food behaviors using large-scale datasets. We propose a case study using ML to predict an aspect of participation in a large, publicly funded nutrition education program (The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program). Participation has important downstream implications for diet quality, food security, and other important nutrition related decisions. We then suggest a process for validating the ML insights using qualitative research and survey data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X24000435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机器学习(ML)为研究人员提供了超越心理学、商业和公共政策研究中常用的研究方法的工具,这些研究涉及联邦营养计划和参与者的食品决策。它是人工智能的一个子领域,应用于特征提取--决策制定的关键步骤。这些特征被用于特定情境下的自动决策,形成预测性人工智能模型。之前的许多研究都依赖于在受控实验室环境中的回顾性、静态、"一次性 "决策,而人工智能允许研究人员使用大规模数据集来完善对参与和饮食行为的预测。我们提出了一个案例研究,利用 ML 预测参与大型公共资助营养教育计划(扩大食品与营养教育计划)的一个方面。参与对饮食质量、食品安全和其他重要的营养相关决策具有重要的下游影响。然后,我们提出了一个利用定性研究和调查数据验证 ML 见解的过程。
A machine learning (ML) approach to understanding participation in government nutrition programs
Machine Learning (ML) affords researchers tools to advance beyond research methods commonly employed in psychology, business, and public policy studies of federal nutrition programs and participant food decision-making. It is a sub domain of AI that is applied for feature extraction – a crucial step in decision making. These features are used in context-specific automated decisions resulting in predictive AI models. Whereas many prior studies rely on retrospective, static, “one-shot” decision-making in controlled laboratory environments, ML allows researchers to refine predictions about participation and food behaviors using large-scale datasets. We propose a case study using ML to predict an aspect of participation in a large, publicly funded nutrition education program (The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program). Participation has important downstream implications for diet quality, food security, and other important nutrition related decisions. We then suggest a process for validating the ML insights using qualitative research and survey data.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology