行为体重管理计划的哪些内容对肥胖症患者的减肥至关重要?系统综述快速回顾。

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1111/obr.13798
Lily K. Hawkins, Lorna Burns, Dawn Swancutt, Shokraneh Moghadam, Jonathan Pinkney, Mark Tarrant, The PROGROUP Programme Team
{"title":"行为体重管理计划的哪些内容对肥胖症患者的减肥至关重要?系统综述快速回顾。","authors":"Lily K. Hawkins,&nbsp;Lorna Burns,&nbsp;Dawn Swancutt,&nbsp;Shokraneh Moghadam,&nbsp;Jonathan Pinkney,&nbsp;Mark Tarrant,&nbsp;The PROGROUP Programme Team","doi":"10.1111/obr.13798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The optimal treatment and organization of care for people with obesity is one of the greatest challenges facing today's health services. While surgery and pharmacotherapy offer effective treatment options for some people with obesity, behavioral interventions are important to support long-term behavioral change. However, little is known about the most effective components of behavioral interventions, and this is especially the case for people with complex or severe obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] &gt; 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Accordingly, the current rapid review aimed to identify which behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective for weight loss in adults with (severe) obesity. A secondary aim was to review the effects of BCTs on dietary behaviors and physical activity, and psychological outcomes, recognizing that behavioral interventions commonly target these. A search of Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science resulted in 1227 results, with 22 reviews eligible for inclusion. The most commonly reported BCTs were self-monitoring and goal setting, but these had variable effects on weight in adults with obesity. Combining these BCTs with other self-regulatory techniques led to increased weight loss. Further, for adults with severe obesity, so-called ‘nudge’ techniques and self-regulatory techniques were associated with greater weight loss. Three reviews also found that while self-monitoring increased physical activity, behavioral commitments increased changes to dietary behaviors. BCTs were not associated with psychological well-being. The review confirms that behavioral interventions have an impact in weight management, including for individuals with more complex or severe obesity, but highlights the need for further investigation of their use within clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obr.13798","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which components of behavioral weight management programs are essential for weight loss in people living with obesity? A rapid review of systematic reviews\",\"authors\":\"Lily K. Hawkins,&nbsp;Lorna Burns,&nbsp;Dawn Swancutt,&nbsp;Shokraneh Moghadam,&nbsp;Jonathan Pinkney,&nbsp;Mark Tarrant,&nbsp;The PROGROUP Programme Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/obr.13798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The optimal treatment and organization of care for people with obesity is one of the greatest challenges facing today's health services. While surgery and pharmacotherapy offer effective treatment options for some people with obesity, behavioral interventions are important to support long-term behavioral change. However, little is known about the most effective components of behavioral interventions, and this is especially the case for people with complex or severe obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] &gt; 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Accordingly, the current rapid review aimed to identify which behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective for weight loss in adults with (severe) obesity. A secondary aim was to review the effects of BCTs on dietary behaviors and physical activity, and psychological outcomes, recognizing that behavioral interventions commonly target these. A search of Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science resulted in 1227 results, with 22 reviews eligible for inclusion. The most commonly reported BCTs were self-monitoring and goal setting, but these had variable effects on weight in adults with obesity. Combining these BCTs with other self-regulatory techniques led to increased weight loss. Further, for adults with severe obesity, so-called ‘nudge’ techniques and self-regulatory techniques were associated with greater weight loss. Three reviews also found that while self-monitoring increased physical activity, behavioral commitments increased changes to dietary behaviors. BCTs were not associated with psychological well-being. The review confirms that behavioral interventions have an impact in weight management, including for individuals with more complex or severe obesity, but highlights the need for further investigation of their use within clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/obr.13798\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13798\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/obr.13798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肥胖症患者的最佳治疗和护理安排是当今医疗服务面临的最大挑战之一。虽然手术和药物治疗为一些肥胖症患者提供了有效的治疗方案,但行为干预对于支持长期的行为改变也非常重要。然而,人们对行为干预最有效的组成部分知之甚少,尤其是对于复杂或严重肥胖(即体重指数大于 35 kg/m2)的患者。因此,本次快速综述旨在确定哪些行为改变技术(BCT)对成人(重度)肥胖症患者的减肥有效。考虑到行为干预通常以饮食行为、体育锻炼和心理结果为目标,本综述的另一个目的是研究行为改变技术对这些方面的影响。通过对 Scopus、Ovid Medline 和 Web of Science 的检索,共获得 1227 项结果,其中 22 篇综述符合纳入条件。最常报道的行为干预措施是自我监控和目标设定,但这些措施对肥胖症成人体重的影响各不相同。将这些BCT与其他自我调节技术相结合可增加减肥效果。此外,对于有严重肥胖症的成年人来说,所谓的 "督促 "技术和自我调节技术与更大的体重减轻相关。三篇综述还发现,虽然自我监测增加了体育锻炼,但行为承诺增加了饮食行为的改变。BCT 与心理健康无关。综述证实了行为干预对体重管理的影响,包括对较为复杂或严重的肥胖症患者的影响,但强调了在临床环境中进一步研究使用行为干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which components of behavioral weight management programs are essential for weight loss in people living with obesity? A rapid review of systematic reviews

The optimal treatment and organization of care for people with obesity is one of the greatest challenges facing today's health services. While surgery and pharmacotherapy offer effective treatment options for some people with obesity, behavioral interventions are important to support long-term behavioral change. However, little is known about the most effective components of behavioral interventions, and this is especially the case for people with complex or severe obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] > 35 kg/m2). Accordingly, the current rapid review aimed to identify which behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective for weight loss in adults with (severe) obesity. A secondary aim was to review the effects of BCTs on dietary behaviors and physical activity, and psychological outcomes, recognizing that behavioral interventions commonly target these. A search of Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science resulted in 1227 results, with 22 reviews eligible for inclusion. The most commonly reported BCTs were self-monitoring and goal setting, but these had variable effects on weight in adults with obesity. Combining these BCTs with other self-regulatory techniques led to increased weight loss. Further, for adults with severe obesity, so-called ‘nudge’ techniques and self-regulatory techniques were associated with greater weight loss. Three reviews also found that while self-monitoring increased physical activity, behavioral commitments increased changes to dietary behaviors. BCTs were not associated with psychological well-being. The review confirms that behavioral interventions have an impact in weight management, including for individuals with more complex or severe obesity, but highlights the need for further investigation of their use within clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
Umbrella review of systematic reviews to inform the development and translation of community-based childhood obesity prevention interventions. The impact of behavioral weight management interventions on eating behavior traits in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of childhood obesity with pubertal development in boys: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in adherence to physical activity guidelines from 1997 to 2018 among adults with obesity: An analysis from the US National Health Interview Survey. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bariatric surgery in patients of 70 years and older: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1