常见抗抑郁治疗药物引起的体重变化 :目标试验模拟研究》。

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.7326/M23-2742
Joshua Petimar, Jessica G Young, Han Yu, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Matthew F Daley, William J Heerman, David M Janicke, W Schuyler Jones, Kristina H Lewis, Pi-I D Lin, Carly Prentice, John W Merriman, Sengwee Toh, Jason P Block
{"title":"常见抗抑郁治疗药物引起的体重变化 :目标试验模拟研究》。","authors":"Joshua Petimar, Jessica G Young, Han Yu, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Matthew F Daley, William J Heerman, David M Janicke, W Schuyler Jones, Kristina H Lewis, Pi-I D Lin, Carly Prentice, John W Merriman, Sengwee Toh, Jason P Block","doi":"10.7326/M23-2742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressants are among the most commonly prescribed medications, but evidence on comparative weight change for specific first-line treatments is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare weight change across common first-line antidepressant treatments by emulating a target trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cohort study over 24 months.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Electronic health record (EHR) data from 2010 to 2019 across 8 U.S. health systems.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>183 118 patients.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Prescription data determined initiation of treatment with sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, duloxetine, or venlafaxine. The investigators estimated the population-level effects of initiating each treatment, relative to sertraline, on mean weight change (primary) and the probability of gaining at least 5% of baseline weight (secondary) 6 months after initiation. Inverse probability weighting of repeated outcome marginal structural models was used to account for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement. In secondary analyses, the effects of initiating and adhering to each treatment protocol were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with that for sertraline, estimated 6-month weight gain was higher for escitalopram (difference, 0.41 kg [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.52 kg]), paroxetine (difference, 0.37 kg [CI, 0.20 to 0.54 kg]), duloxetine (difference, 0.34 kg [CI, 0.22 to 0.44 kg]), venlafaxine (difference, 0.17 kg [CI, 0.03 to 0.31 kg]), and citalopram (difference, 0.12 kg [CI, 0.02 to 0.23 kg]); similar for fluoxetine (difference, -0.07 kg [CI, -0.19 to 0.04 kg]); and lower for bupropion (difference, -0.22 kg [CI, -0.33 to -0.12 kg]). Escitalopram, paroxetine, and duloxetine were associated with 10% to 15% higher risk for gaining at least 5% of baseline weight, whereas bupropion was associated with 15% reduced risk. When the effects of initiation and adherence were estimated, associations were stronger but had wider CIs. Six-month adherence ranged from 28% (duloxetine) to 41% (bupropion).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>No data on medication dispensing, low medication adherence, incomplete data on adherence, and incomplete data on weight measures across time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small differences in mean weight change were found between 8 first-line antidepressants, with bupropion consistently showing the least weight gain, although adherence to medications over follow-up was low. Clinicians could consider potential weight gain when initiating antidepressant treatment.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institutes of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication-Induced Weight Change Across Common Antidepressant Treatments : A Target Trial Emulation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Petimar, Jessica G Young, Han Yu, Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman, Matthew F Daley, William J Heerman, David M Janicke, W Schuyler Jones, Kristina H Lewis, Pi-I D Lin, Carly Prentice, John W Merriman, Sengwee Toh, Jason P Block\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/M23-2742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressants are among the most commonly prescribed medications, but evidence on comparative weight change for specific first-line treatments is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare weight change across common first-line antidepressant treatments by emulating a target trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cohort study over 24 months.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Electronic health record (EHR) data from 2010 to 2019 across 8 U.S. health systems.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>183 118 patients.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Prescription data determined initiation of treatment with sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, duloxetine, or venlafaxine. The investigators estimated the population-level effects of initiating each treatment, relative to sertraline, on mean weight change (primary) and the probability of gaining at least 5% of baseline weight (secondary) 6 months after initiation. Inverse probability weighting of repeated outcome marginal structural models was used to account for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement. In secondary analyses, the effects of initiating and adhering to each treatment protocol were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with that for sertraline, estimated 6-month weight gain was higher for escitalopram (difference, 0.41 kg [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.52 kg]), paroxetine (difference, 0.37 kg [CI, 0.20 to 0.54 kg]), duloxetine (difference, 0.34 kg [CI, 0.22 to 0.44 kg]), venlafaxine (difference, 0.17 kg [CI, 0.03 to 0.31 kg]), and citalopram (difference, 0.12 kg [CI, 0.02 to 0.23 kg]); similar for fluoxetine (difference, -0.07 kg [CI, -0.19 to 0.04 kg]); and lower for bupropion (difference, -0.22 kg [CI, -0.33 to -0.12 kg]). Escitalopram, paroxetine, and duloxetine were associated with 10% to 15% higher risk for gaining at least 5% of baseline weight, whereas bupropion was associated with 15% reduced risk. When the effects of initiation and adherence were estimated, associations were stronger but had wider CIs. Six-month adherence ranged from 28% (duloxetine) to 41% (bupropion).</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>No data on medication dispensing, low medication adherence, incomplete data on adherence, and incomplete data on weight measures across time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Small differences in mean weight change were found between 8 first-line antidepressants, with bupropion consistently showing the least weight gain, although adherence to medications over follow-up was low. Clinicians could consider potential weight gain when initiating antidepressant treatment.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institutes of Health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-2742\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-2742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗抑郁药是最常用的处方药之一,但特定一线治疗的体重变化比较证据有限:通过模仿目标试验,比较常见一线抗抑郁治疗的体重变化:设计:为期 24 个月的观察性队列研究:8个美国医疗系统2010年至2019年的电子健康记录(EHR)数据:183118名患者:处方数据确定了开始使用舍曲林、西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀、安非他酮、度洛西汀或文拉法辛治疗的时间。研究人员估算了相对于舍曲林,开始每种治疗对平均体重变化(主要影响)和开始治疗 6 个月后体重增加至少 5%(次要影响)的概率的人群水平影响。重复结果边际结构模型采用反概率加权,以考虑基线混杂因素和信息结果测量。在次要分析中,对开始和坚持每种治疗方案的效果进行了估计:与舍曲林相比,艾司西酞普兰(差异为 0.41 kg [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.52 kg])、帕罗西汀(差异为 0.37 kg [CI, 0.20 to 0.54 kg])、度洛西汀(差异为 0.34 kg [CI, 0.22 to 0.44千克])、文拉法辛(差异为0.17千克[CI,0.03至0.31千克])和西酞普兰(差异为0.12千克[CI,0.02至0.23千克]);氟西汀(差异为-0.07千克[CI,-0.19至0.04千克])与之相似;而安非他酮(差异为-0.22千克[CI,-0.33至-0.12千克])则较低。艾司西酞普兰、帕罗西汀和度洛西汀导致体重增加至少5%的风险增加了10%至15%,而安非他酮则降低了15%。在估算开始用药和坚持用药的影响时,相关性更强,但CI更宽。六个月的依从性从28%(度洛西汀)到41%(安非他酮)不等:局限性:没有配药数据,用药依从性低,依从性数据不完整,各时间点体重测量数据不完整:8种一线抗抑郁药物的平均体重变化差异较小,其中安非他酮的体重增加幅度最小,但随访期间的用药依从性较低。临床医生在开始抗抑郁治疗时可考虑潜在的体重增加:主要资金来源:美国国立卫生研究院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medication-Induced Weight Change Across Common Antidepressant Treatments : A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Background: Antidepressants are among the most commonly prescribed medications, but evidence on comparative weight change for specific first-line treatments is limited.

Objective: To compare weight change across common first-line antidepressant treatments by emulating a target trial.

Design: Observational cohort study over 24 months.

Setting: Electronic health record (EHR) data from 2010 to 2019 across 8 U.S. health systems.

Participants: 183 118 patients.

Measurements: Prescription data determined initiation of treatment with sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, duloxetine, or venlafaxine. The investigators estimated the population-level effects of initiating each treatment, relative to sertraline, on mean weight change (primary) and the probability of gaining at least 5% of baseline weight (secondary) 6 months after initiation. Inverse probability weighting of repeated outcome marginal structural models was used to account for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement. In secondary analyses, the effects of initiating and adhering to each treatment protocol were estimated.

Results: Compared with that for sertraline, estimated 6-month weight gain was higher for escitalopram (difference, 0.41 kg [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.52 kg]), paroxetine (difference, 0.37 kg [CI, 0.20 to 0.54 kg]), duloxetine (difference, 0.34 kg [CI, 0.22 to 0.44 kg]), venlafaxine (difference, 0.17 kg [CI, 0.03 to 0.31 kg]), and citalopram (difference, 0.12 kg [CI, 0.02 to 0.23 kg]); similar for fluoxetine (difference, -0.07 kg [CI, -0.19 to 0.04 kg]); and lower for bupropion (difference, -0.22 kg [CI, -0.33 to -0.12 kg]). Escitalopram, paroxetine, and duloxetine were associated with 10% to 15% higher risk for gaining at least 5% of baseline weight, whereas bupropion was associated with 15% reduced risk. When the effects of initiation and adherence were estimated, associations were stronger but had wider CIs. Six-month adherence ranged from 28% (duloxetine) to 41% (bupropion).

Limitation: No data on medication dispensing, low medication adherence, incomplete data on adherence, and incomplete data on weight measures across time points.

Conclusion: Small differences in mean weight change were found between 8 first-line antidepressants, with bupropion consistently showing the least weight gain, although adherence to medications over follow-up was low. Clinicians could consider potential weight gain when initiating antidepressant treatment.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Hormonal Treatments and Vaginal Moisturizers for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : A Systematic Review. Hormonal Treatments and Vaginal Moisturizers for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause. Association Between Hospital Type and Resilience During COVID-19 Caseload Stress : A Retrospective Cohort Study. Complementary and Alternative Therapies for Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause : An Evidence Map. Guidelines Recommending That Clinicians Advise Patients on Lifestyle Changes: A Popular but Questionable Approach to Improve Public Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1