急诊科接诊的青少年阿片类药物患者尿液药物筛查敏感性的变化。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173
Alexander Sidlak, Mannet Dhaliwal
{"title":"急诊科接诊的青少年阿片类药物患者尿液药物筛查敏感性的变化。","authors":"Alexander Sidlak, Mannet Dhaliwal","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adolescent overdoses have been rising over the past decade. Emergency department (ED) visits for both acute overdoses and for adolescents in opioid withdrawal have risen post-COVID. Urine drug screens have poor utility in the ED but are routinely obtained for medical clearance and in the management of patients with substance use disorder. Our primary goal was to measure the sensitivity of the opiate urine drug assay over time in opioid-related presentations to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed ED presentations at all EDs within our health system that were directly related to opioids from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2022. For each patient included over the time frame, we identified whether a urine drug screen was obtained and the results from this screen. The urine drug screen available at all sites was an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay with an opiate screen (morphine antibody), but no fentanyl screen. The percent positivity for each drug category on enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique testing was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare positivity rates between years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opiate positivity declined over the last 9 years. Positivity rates from 2020 to 2022 were 5% ± 2% vs 82% ± 6% from 2014 to 2019 ( P < 0.001) Performance of UDS also declined over time (76% from 2014 to 2019 vs 46% from 2020 to 2022; P < 0.001). UDS was more likely to be performed in patients after a suicide attempt or when presenting after illicit use (66% vs 38%; P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opiate screen positivity decreased the last 9 years and may reflect wider use of fentanyl among this population starting in 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Urine Drug Screen Sensitivity in Adolescent Opioid Presentations to the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Sidlak, Mannet Dhaliwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adolescent overdoses have been rising over the past decade. Emergency department (ED) visits for both acute overdoses and for adolescents in opioid withdrawal have risen post-COVID. Urine drug screens have poor utility in the ED but are routinely obtained for medical clearance and in the management of patients with substance use disorder. Our primary goal was to measure the sensitivity of the opiate urine drug assay over time in opioid-related presentations to the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed ED presentations at all EDs within our health system that were directly related to opioids from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2022. For each patient included over the time frame, we identified whether a urine drug screen was obtained and the results from this screen. The urine drug screen available at all sites was an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay with an opiate screen (morphine antibody), but no fentanyl screen. The percent positivity for each drug category on enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique testing was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare positivity rates between years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Opiate positivity declined over the last 9 years. Positivity rates from 2020 to 2022 were 5% ± 2% vs 82% ± 6% from 2014 to 2019 ( P < 0.001) Performance of UDS also declined over time (76% from 2014 to 2019 vs 46% from 2020 to 2022; P < 0.001). UDS was more likely to be performed in patients after a suicide attempt or when presenting after illicit use (66% vs 38%; P = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opiate screen positivity decreased the last 9 years and may reflect wider use of fentanyl among this population starting in 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric emergency care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在过去十年中,青少年吸毒过量的人数一直在上升。COVID 后,因急性过量用药和青少年阿片类药物戒断而到急诊科(ED)就诊的人数都有所增加。尿液药物筛查在急诊室的实用性较差,但在医学检查和药物使用障碍患者管理中,尿液药物筛查是常规检查项目。我们的主要目标是测量鸦片类药物尿液药物检测在一段时间内对急诊室阿片类药物相关就诊者的敏感性:我们回顾了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间医疗系统内所有急诊室与阿片类药物直接相关的急诊病例。对于这段时间内收治的每位患者,我们都确定了是否进行了尿液药物筛查以及筛查结果。所有医疗点提供的尿液药物筛查都是酶联免疫测定,其中包括阿片类药物筛查(吗啡抗体),但没有芬太尼筛查。计算了酶联免疫分析技术检测中各类药物的阳性率。采用卡方检验比较不同年份的阳性率:结果:鸦片剂阳性率在过去 9 年中有所下降。2020年至2022年的阳性率为5% ± 2% vs 2014年至2019年的82% ± 6%(P < 0.001),UDS的执行率也随着时间的推移而下降(2014年至2019年为76% vs 2020年至2022年为46%;P < 0.001)。自杀未遂或非法用药后就诊的患者更有可能进行 UDS(66% vs 38%;P = 0.004):结论:鸦片剂筛查阳性率在过去 9 年中有所下降,这可能反映了自 2020 年起芬太尼在这一人群中的广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changes in Urine Drug Screen Sensitivity in Adolescent Opioid Presentations to the Emergency Department.

Introduction: Adolescent overdoses have been rising over the past decade. Emergency department (ED) visits for both acute overdoses and for adolescents in opioid withdrawal have risen post-COVID. Urine drug screens have poor utility in the ED but are routinely obtained for medical clearance and in the management of patients with substance use disorder. Our primary goal was to measure the sensitivity of the opiate urine drug assay over time in opioid-related presentations to the ED.

Methods: We reviewed ED presentations at all EDs within our health system that were directly related to opioids from 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2022. For each patient included over the time frame, we identified whether a urine drug screen was obtained and the results from this screen. The urine drug screen available at all sites was an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay with an opiate screen (morphine antibody), but no fentanyl screen. The percent positivity for each drug category on enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique testing was calculated. Chi-squared tests were used to compare positivity rates between years.

Results: Opiate positivity declined over the last 9 years. Positivity rates from 2020 to 2022 were 5% ± 2% vs 82% ± 6% from 2014 to 2019 ( P < 0.001) Performance of UDS also declined over time (76% from 2014 to 2019 vs 46% from 2020 to 2022; P < 0.001). UDS was more likely to be performed in patients after a suicide attempt or when presenting after illicit use (66% vs 38%; P = 0.004).

Conclusion: Opiate screen positivity decreased the last 9 years and may reflect wider use of fentanyl among this population starting in 2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Race on Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in the Emergency Department. Ultrasound Imaging of Various Ingested Foreign Bodies in an Ex Vivo Intestinal Model. Risk of Urinary Tract Infection and Bacteremia in Infants Infected With COVID-19. The Effect of Step Stool Use on Chest Compression Quality During CPR in Young Children: Findings From the Videography in Pediatric Emergency Research (VIPER) Collaborative. Pediatric Off-Road Vehicle Injuries: Side-by-Sides Worse for the Upper Extremity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1