Exploring the use of averaged thermal kinetic parameters in luminescence thermochronometry

In luminescence thermochronometry, the thermal stability of feldspar minerals is conventionally constrained from isothermal decay experiments. However, despite recent refinement of the measurement protocol, measurements take several days and are routinely done for each individual sample. Following that most other thermochronometric methods usually use only a single reference set of thermal kinetic parameters, and that recent studies on direct physical probing of feldspar sample properties have shown that trap depth and band-tail width are broadly similar despite large variations in chemical composition, we sought to optimise luminescence thermochronometry measurements by exploring whether a single set of thermal kinetic parameters can describe luminescence thermal decay in feldspar. We explored the effect of using averaged thermal kinetic parameters rather than sample-specific thermal kinetic parameters to model luminescence signal accumulation under different thermal conditions. A set of K- and Na-feldspar minerals extracted from all over the world were analysed after being measured with a multi-elevated temperature protocol, comprising four different IRSL signals at 50, 100, 150, and 225 °C. Comparisons were done between the thermal kinetic parameters of each IRSL signal depending on different variables such as geographic region, transect, lithology, or mineralogy of the analysed feldspar grains. Even though it is not possible to generalise the thermal kinetic parameters between IRSL signals measured at different temperatures, the variance between the thermal kinetic parameters of different samples measured at the same IRSL temperature is consistent with the uncertainties on the individual parameters (i.e., <2–10%), suggesting that averaged, rather than sample-specific values may be appropriate. We then explored the effect of using these averaged parameters to model luminescence signal accumulation under different synthetic and natural thermal conditions. For our dataset, results show minimal impact on the obtained cooling histories and exhumation rates. We therefore propose the use of averaged rather than sample-specific thermal kinetic parameters for rapid investigation of luminescence thermochronometry samples. Based on careful initial characterisation of a few samples to verify the validity of using averaged thermal kinetic parameters, this would reduce measurement times by ca. 50% (i.e., 3–4 days per sample), allowing higher resolution sampling and measurement.