戈斯福德砂岩钻孔破裂形成的实验研究

IF 7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105824
Zizhuo Xiang , Guangyao Si , Joung Oh , Ismet Canbulat , Charlie C. Li
{"title":"戈斯福德砂岩钻孔破裂形成的实验研究","authors":"Zizhuo Xiang ,&nbsp;Guangyao Si ,&nbsp;Joung Oh ,&nbsp;Ismet Canbulat ,&nbsp;Charlie C. Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the in-situ borehole breakout formation using true-triaxial laboratory experiments on cubic Gosford sandstone. Four series of tests have been conducted under varying stress conditions following two approaches: PD method (loading onto specimens with pre-drilled boreholes) and PS method (loading onto intact specimens and then conducting drilling). Borehole camera observations show that a large amount of rock debris remains within the breakout zone under the PD conditions, while clear V-shaped notches are observed in the PS tests. The breakout geometries are extracted based on point cloud data obtained from 3D scanning. Both breakout width and normalised depth under both testing approaches exhibit positive correlations with the maximum horizontal stress while decreasing with minimum horizontal stress. The PS tests tend to yield wider and deeper breakouts compared to the PD tests. The difference in breakout width is generally consistent across various stress conditions at approximately 10° – 15°, whereas the variation in the normalised breakout depth increases with the severity of the borehole failure. The discrepancies are believed to be attributed to the excavation unloading induced strength-weakening and removal of rock debris by circulating fluid and drilling vibration. The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the stress path has critical impacts on the rock failure behaviours around openings, and the PS tests are suggested for investigating the borehole breakout phenomenon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental investigation of borehole breakout formation in Gosford sandstone\",\"authors\":\"Zizhuo Xiang ,&nbsp;Guangyao Si ,&nbsp;Joung Oh ,&nbsp;Ismet Canbulat ,&nbsp;Charlie C. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the in-situ borehole breakout formation using true-triaxial laboratory experiments on cubic Gosford sandstone. Four series of tests have been conducted under varying stress conditions following two approaches: PD method (loading onto specimens with pre-drilled boreholes) and PS method (loading onto intact specimens and then conducting drilling). Borehole camera observations show that a large amount of rock debris remains within the breakout zone under the PD conditions, while clear V-shaped notches are observed in the PS tests. The breakout geometries are extracted based on point cloud data obtained from 3D scanning. Both breakout width and normalised depth under both testing approaches exhibit positive correlations with the maximum horizontal stress while decreasing with minimum horizontal stress. The PS tests tend to yield wider and deeper breakouts compared to the PD tests. The difference in breakout width is generally consistent across various stress conditions at approximately 10° – 15°, whereas the variation in the normalised breakout depth increases with the severity of the borehole failure. The discrepancies are believed to be attributed to the excavation unloading induced strength-weakening and removal of rock debris by circulating fluid and drilling vibration. The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the stress path has critical impacts on the rock failure behaviours around openings, and the PS tests are suggested for investigating the borehole breakout phenomenon.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924001898\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924001898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过在立方体戈斯福德砂岩上进行真实三轴实验室实验,对原位钻孔破裂的形成进行了研究。在不同的应力条件下,采用两种方法进行了四个系列的测试:PD法(加载到预钻孔的试样上)和PS法(加载到完好的试样上,然后进行钻孔)。钻孔照相机的观察结果表明,在 PD 条件下,破损区内残留大量岩石碎屑,而在 PS 试验中则观察到明显的 V 形缺口。根据三维扫描获得的点云数据,提取了突破的几何形状。两种测试方法下的突破宽度和归一化深度都与最大水平应力呈正相关,而与最小水平应力呈负相关。与 PD 试验相比,PS 试验往往会产生更宽更深的突破。在各种应力条件下,破裂宽度的差异基本一致,约为 10° - 15°,而归一化破裂深度的变化则随着井眼破坏的严重程度而增加。这些差异被认为是由于开挖卸载引起的强度减弱以及循环流体和钻井振动对岩石碎屑的清除造成的。研究结果表明,应力路径对开口周围的岩石破坏行为具有关键影响,建议采用 PS 试验来研究钻孔破裂现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental investigation of borehole breakout formation in Gosford sandstone

This study investigates the in-situ borehole breakout formation using true-triaxial laboratory experiments on cubic Gosford sandstone. Four series of tests have been conducted under varying stress conditions following two approaches: PD method (loading onto specimens with pre-drilled boreholes) and PS method (loading onto intact specimens and then conducting drilling). Borehole camera observations show that a large amount of rock debris remains within the breakout zone under the PD conditions, while clear V-shaped notches are observed in the PS tests. The breakout geometries are extracted based on point cloud data obtained from 3D scanning. Both breakout width and normalised depth under both testing approaches exhibit positive correlations with the maximum horizontal stress while decreasing with minimum horizontal stress. The PS tests tend to yield wider and deeper breakouts compared to the PD tests. The difference in breakout width is generally consistent across various stress conditions at approximately 10° – 15°, whereas the variation in the normalised breakout depth increases with the severity of the borehole failure. The discrepancies are believed to be attributed to the excavation unloading induced strength-weakening and removal of rock debris by circulating fluid and drilling vibration. The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the stress path has critical impacts on the rock failure behaviours around openings, and the PS tests are suggested for investigating the borehole breakout phenomenon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences focuses on original research, new developments, site measurements, and case studies within the fields of rock mechanics and rock engineering. Serving as an international platform, it showcases high-quality papers addressing rock mechanics and the application of its principles and techniques in mining and civil engineering projects situated on or within rock masses. These projects encompass a wide range, including slopes, open-pit mines, quarries, shafts, tunnels, caverns, underground mines, metro systems, dams, hydro-electric stations, geothermal energy, petroleum engineering, and radioactive waste disposal. The journal welcomes submissions on various topics, with particular interest in theoretical advancements, analytical and numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.
期刊最新文献
Implicit hydromechanical representation of fractures using a continuum approach Damage quantification and failure prediction of rock: A novel approach based on energy evolution obtained from infrared radiation and acoustic emission A coarse-grained approach to modeling gas transport in swelling porous media Failure characteristics and energy evolution process of delayed and instantaneous basalt rockburst under true triaxial conditions Fractal contact and asperities coalescence of rock joints under normal loading: Insights from pressure-sensitive film measurement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1