处方者和患者推动了社区肿瘤诊所的维持治疗模式:国家指南与实际经验

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101440
Dana M. Chase , Laura Iadeluca , Jonathan Lim , Wan-Yu Tseng , Purva Bulsara , Gregory Patton
{"title":"处方者和患者推动了社区肿瘤诊所的维持治疗模式:国家指南与实际经验","authors":"Dana M. Chase ,&nbsp;Laura Iadeluca ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lim ,&nbsp;Wan-Yu Tseng ,&nbsp;Purva Bulsara ,&nbsp;Gregory Patton","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that first-line (1L) maintenance therapy (MT) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and/or bevacizumab improves outcomes among patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC); however, these treatments are underutilized. This study aimed to provide a real-world understanding of MTs among patients with advanced OC who received 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review using iKnowMed electronic health records to identify patients aged ≥18 years with advanced OC who initiated 1L PBC between January 1, 2018–December 31, 2020. Following 1L PBC, patients could have received MT or active surveillance (AS). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 600 chart-reviewed patients included, 239 (39.8 %) received MT and 315 (52.5 %) received AS. Patients who were &lt;65 years of age, or those with higher-stage disease or those who had received neoadjuvant treatment, were more likely to initiate MT than AS. Genetic testing rates were low across both cohorts. Median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) TTD for the MT cohort was 13.6 months (11.0, 21.2). Median (95 % CI) rwPFS was 26.9 months (21.3, not reached) and 11.3 months (9.5, 13.0) for the 1L MT and AS cohorts, respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). OS at 36 months was 82.4 % in the 1L MT cohort and 58.0 % in the 1L AS cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study reinforces clinical trial findings that 1L MT improves outcomes in patients with advanced OC; however, genetic testing rates and 1L MT remained low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892400119X/pdfft?md5=741da3c18305d365a67f1353470d4922&pid=1-s2.0-S235257892400119X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribers and patients drive maintenance therapy patterns in a community oncology practice: National guidelines versus the real-world experience\",\"authors\":\"Dana M. Chase ,&nbsp;Laura Iadeluca ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lim ,&nbsp;Wan-Yu Tseng ,&nbsp;Purva Bulsara ,&nbsp;Gregory Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Previous studies have shown that first-line (1L) maintenance therapy (MT) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and/or bevacizumab improves outcomes among patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC); however, these treatments are underutilized. This study aimed to provide a real-world understanding of MTs among patients with advanced OC who received 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review using iKnowMed electronic health records to identify patients aged ≥18 years with advanced OC who initiated 1L PBC between January 1, 2018–December 31, 2020. Following 1L PBC, patients could have received MT or active surveillance (AS). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 600 chart-reviewed patients included, 239 (39.8 %) received MT and 315 (52.5 %) received AS. Patients who were &lt;65 years of age, or those with higher-stage disease or those who had received neoadjuvant treatment, were more likely to initiate MT than AS. Genetic testing rates were low across both cohorts. Median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) TTD for the MT cohort was 13.6 months (11.0, 21.2). Median (95 % CI) rwPFS was 26.9 months (21.3, not reached) and 11.3 months (9.5, 13.0) for the 1L MT and AS cohorts, respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). OS at 36 months was 82.4 % in the 1L MT cohort and 58.0 % in the 1L AS cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study reinforces clinical trial findings that 1L MT improves outcomes in patients with advanced OC; however, genetic testing rates and 1L MT remained low.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892400119X/pdfft?md5=741da3c18305d365a67f1353470d4922&pid=1-s2.0-S235257892400119X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892400119X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235257892400119X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的以往的研究表明,使用多聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂和/或贝伐单抗进行一线(1L)维持治疗(MT)可改善晚期卵巢癌(OC)患者的预后;然而,这些治疗方法的使用率却很低。本研究旨在真实了解接受1L铂类化疗(PBC)的晚期OC患者的MTs情况。方法使用iKnowMed电子健康记录进行回顾性病历审查,以确定在2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间接受1L PBC治疗的年龄≥18岁的晚期OC患者。在 1L PBC 之后,患者可以接受 MT 或主动监测 (AS)。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估算终止治疗时间(TTD)、真实世界无进展生存期(rwPFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果在纳入的600例图表审查患者中,239例(39.8%)接受了MT治疗,315例(52.5%)接受了AS治疗。65岁以上的患者、疾病分期较高的患者或接受过新辅助治疗的患者接受MT治疗的几率高于AS治疗。两组患者的基因检测率都很低。MT队列的中位(95% 置信区间[CI])TTD为13.6个月(11.0,21.2)。1L MT队列和AS队列的中位(95 % CI)rwPFS分别为26.9个月(21.3,未达到)和11.3个月(9.5,13.0)(p < 0.0001)。36 个月的 OS 在 1L MT 队列中为 82.4%,在 1L AS 队列中为 58.0%。结论这项研究加强了临床试验结果,即 1L MT 可改善晚期 OC 患者的预后;然而,基因检测率和 1L MT 仍然很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prescribers and patients drive maintenance therapy patterns in a community oncology practice: National guidelines versus the real-world experience

Objective

Previous studies have shown that first-line (1L) maintenance therapy (MT) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and/or bevacizumab improves outcomes among patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC); however, these treatments are underutilized. This study aimed to provide a real-world understanding of MTs among patients with advanced OC who received 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC).

Methods

A retrospective chart review using iKnowMed electronic health records to identify patients aged ≥18 years with advanced OC who initiated 1L PBC between January 1, 2018–December 31, 2020. Following 1L PBC, patients could have received MT or active surveillance (AS). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Of the 600 chart-reviewed patients included, 239 (39.8 %) received MT and 315 (52.5 %) received AS. Patients who were <65 years of age, or those with higher-stage disease or those who had received neoadjuvant treatment, were more likely to initiate MT than AS. Genetic testing rates were low across both cohorts. Median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) TTD for the MT cohort was 13.6 months (11.0, 21.2). Median (95 % CI) rwPFS was 26.9 months (21.3, not reached) and 11.3 months (9.5, 13.0) for the 1L MT and AS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). OS at 36 months was 82.4 % in the 1L MT cohort and 58.0 % in the 1L AS cohort.

Conclusions

This study reinforces clinical trial findings that 1L MT improves outcomes in patients with advanced OC; however, genetic testing rates and 1L MT remained low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
When ovarian mature teratoma peritonitis mimics cancer: What is the best treatment? High Rates of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Somali Patients with Ovarian Cancer Sleep characteristics and recurrence in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A feasibility study Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1