基线淋巴细胞减少症对局部晚期宫颈癌最终治疗结果的影响

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101448
Einsley-Marie Janowski , Emilee Hall , Ruyun Jin , Bethany Horton , Kristin Walker , Matthew Mistro , Timothy Showalter , Kara Romano
{"title":"基线淋巴细胞减少症对局部晚期宫颈癌最终治疗结果的影响","authors":"Einsley-Marie Janowski ,&nbsp;Emilee Hall ,&nbsp;Ruyun Jin ,&nbsp;Bethany Horton ,&nbsp;Kristin Walker ,&nbsp;Matthew Mistro ,&nbsp;Timothy Showalter ,&nbsp;Kara Romano","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between lymphopenia and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed patients with LACC treated at a single institution from 2004 to 2021. Patient and treatment characteristics were recorded along with baseline absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were calculated from start of treatment to date of last follow-up. Cox regression and competing risks regression model were performed to evaluate whether baseline ALC was associated with OS, PFS, or LC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>246 patients met study inclusion criteria with stage IB – IV disease with a median follow up of 2.8 years (range 0.2–13.4 years). 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 68.4 % (95 % CI 61.7–75.9), 57.2 % (95 % CI 50.4–64.8), and 79.0 % (95 % CI 73.0–84.4), respectively. Baseline lymphopenia (ALC &lt; 1000 cells/mm3) was present in 12.5 % of patients. OS was improved in the patients without lymphopenia, with a 5-year OS of 69.0 % (95 % CI 61.6–77.3) versus 63.0 % (95 % CI 47.6–83.3)in the lymphopenia group (<em>p</em> = 0.233), though this did not meet statistical significance. PFS also trended towards improvement in patients without baseline lymphopenia, with a 5-year PFS of 58.5 % (95 % CI 51.2–66.8) versus 48.5 % (95 % CI 32.8–71.7), <em>p</em> = 0.220. No significant difference was found for LC in the patients without lymphopenia, <em>p</em> = 0.745.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this single institution experience of LACC treated with definitive CRT, we found that baseline lymphopenia trends toward inferior OS and PFS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001279/pdfft?md5=1b5668676d995733b37b14725fb0990d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001279-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of baseline lymphopenia on outcomes of definitive treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer\",\"authors\":\"Einsley-Marie Janowski ,&nbsp;Emilee Hall ,&nbsp;Ruyun Jin ,&nbsp;Bethany Horton ,&nbsp;Kristin Walker ,&nbsp;Matthew Mistro ,&nbsp;Timothy Showalter ,&nbsp;Kara Romano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between lymphopenia and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed patients with LACC treated at a single institution from 2004 to 2021. Patient and treatment characteristics were recorded along with baseline absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were calculated from start of treatment to date of last follow-up. Cox regression and competing risks regression model were performed to evaluate whether baseline ALC was associated with OS, PFS, or LC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>246 patients met study inclusion criteria with stage IB – IV disease with a median follow up of 2.8 years (range 0.2–13.4 years). 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 68.4 % (95 % CI 61.7–75.9), 57.2 % (95 % CI 50.4–64.8), and 79.0 % (95 % CI 73.0–84.4), respectively. Baseline lymphopenia (ALC &lt; 1000 cells/mm3) was present in 12.5 % of patients. OS was improved in the patients without lymphopenia, with a 5-year OS of 69.0 % (95 % CI 61.6–77.3) versus 63.0 % (95 % CI 47.6–83.3)in the lymphopenia group (<em>p</em> = 0.233), though this did not meet statistical significance. PFS also trended towards improvement in patients without baseline lymphopenia, with a 5-year PFS of 58.5 % (95 % CI 51.2–66.8) versus 48.5 % (95 % CI 32.8–71.7), <em>p</em> = 0.220. No significant difference was found for LC in the patients without lymphopenia, <em>p</em> = 0.745.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this single institution experience of LACC treated with definitive CRT, we found that baseline lymphopenia trends toward inferior OS and PFS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001279/pdfft?md5=1b5668676d995733b37b14725fb0990d&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001279-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估接受确定性化疗(CRT)治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)女性患者的淋巴细胞减少与生存率之间的关系。我们记录了患者和治疗特点以及基线绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)。计算了从治疗开始到最后一次随访的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部控制率(LC)。结果 246 例符合研究纳入标准的 IB - IV 期患者的中位随访时间为 2.8 年(0.2-13.4 年)。5年OS、PFS和LC分别为68.4% (95 % CI 61.7-75.9)、57.2% (95 % CI 50.4-64.8)和79.0% (95 % CI 73.0-84.4)。12.5%的患者存在基线淋巴细胞减少症(ALC < 1000 cells/mm3)。无淋巴细胞减少症患者的 OS 有所改善,5 年 OS 为 69.0%(95 % CI 61.6-77.3),而淋巴细胞减少症组为 63.0%(95 % CI 47.6-83.3)(p = 0.233),但未达到统计学意义。无基线淋巴细胞减少症患者的生存期也呈改善趋势,5 年生存期为 58.5% (95 % CI 51.2-66.8) 对 48.5% (95 % CI 32.8-71.7),p = 0.220。没有淋巴细胞减少症的患者在 LC 方面没有发现明显差异,p = 0.745。结论在这一单机构经验中,我们发现基线淋巴细胞减少症会导致 OS 和 PFS 下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of baseline lymphopenia on outcomes of definitive treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer

Objectives

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between lymphopenia and survival in women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with LACC treated at a single institution from 2004 to 2021. Patient and treatment characteristics were recorded along with baseline absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were calculated from start of treatment to date of last follow-up. Cox regression and competing risks regression model were performed to evaluate whether baseline ALC was associated with OS, PFS, or LC.

Results

246 patients met study inclusion criteria with stage IB – IV disease with a median follow up of 2.8 years (range 0.2–13.4 years). 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 68.4 % (95 % CI 61.7–75.9), 57.2 % (95 % CI 50.4–64.8), and 79.0 % (95 % CI 73.0–84.4), respectively. Baseline lymphopenia (ALC < 1000 cells/mm3) was present in 12.5 % of patients. OS was improved in the patients without lymphopenia, with a 5-year OS of 69.0 % (95 % CI 61.6–77.3) versus 63.0 % (95 % CI 47.6–83.3)in the lymphopenia group (p = 0.233), though this did not meet statistical significance. PFS also trended towards improvement in patients without baseline lymphopenia, with a 5-year PFS of 58.5 % (95 % CI 51.2–66.8) versus 48.5 % (95 % CI 32.8–71.7), p = 0.220. No significant difference was found for LC in the patients without lymphopenia, p = 0.745.

Conclusions

In this single institution experience of LACC treated with definitive CRT, we found that baseline lymphopenia trends toward inferior OS and PFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
When ovarian mature teratoma peritonitis mimics cancer: What is the best treatment? High Rates of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Somali Patients with Ovarian Cancer Sleep characteristics and recurrence in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Implementation of enhanced recovery protocols in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for metastatic ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A feasibility study Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1