价格很重:重量的触觉如何影响人们对分区定价与合并定价的偏好

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114797
Rajat Roy , Taku Togawa , Jaewoo Park , Hiroaki Ishii , Vik Naidoo
{"title":"价格很重:重量的触觉如何影响人们对分区定价与合并定价的偏好","authors":"Rajat Roy ,&nbsp;Taku Togawa ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Ishii ,&nbsp;Vik Naidoo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research makes a novel proposition that the haptic sensation of weight can moderate the effect of price framing on consumer decisions. Participants who experienced heaviness (lightness) preferred a target product presented in terms of combined (partitioned) versus partitioned (combined) pricing frames. This effect was further mediated by ease of processing. Four studies (three laboratory and one field experiment) were conducted to test the key hypotheses and provide evidence for causality and external validity. Across the four studies, the haptic sensation of weight was manipulated through semantics (Studies 1, 3), embodied experience (Study 2), and part of the product experience (Study 4). In studies 1, 2 and 3, the haptic experience of weight was independent of the target product evaluation, whereas in the fourth study, the weight experience was part of the target product evaluation itself. The findings across the studies are consistent, robust, and have theoretical and managerial implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The price is Heavy: How the haptic sensation of weight influences preference for partitioned versus combined pricing\",\"authors\":\"Rajat Roy ,&nbsp;Taku Togawa ,&nbsp;Jaewoo Park ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Ishii ,&nbsp;Vik Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research makes a novel proposition that the haptic sensation of weight can moderate the effect of price framing on consumer decisions. Participants who experienced heaviness (lightness) preferred a target product presented in terms of combined (partitioned) versus partitioned (combined) pricing frames. This effect was further mediated by ease of processing. Four studies (three laboratory and one field experiment) were conducted to test the key hypotheses and provide evidence for causality and external validity. Across the four studies, the haptic sensation of weight was manipulated through semantics (Studies 1, 3), embodied experience (Study 2), and part of the product experience (Study 4). In studies 1, 2 and 3, the haptic experience of weight was independent of the target product evaluation, whereas in the fourth study, the weight experience was part of the target product evaluation itself. The findings across the studies are consistent, robust, and have theoretical and managerial implications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324003011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324003011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究提出了一个新颖的命题,即重量的触觉可以缓和价格框架对消费者决策的影响。体验到重量感(轻盈感)的受试者更喜欢以组合(分区)与分区(组合)定价框架展示的目标产品。这种效应还受到加工难易程度的影响。我们进行了四项研究(三项实验室实验和一项现场实验)来验证关键假设,并为因果关系和外部有效性提供证据。在这四项研究中,重量的触觉是通过语义(研究 1、3)、体现体验(研究 2)和部分产品体验(研究 4)来操控的。在研究 1、2 和 3 中,重量的触觉体验与目标产品评价无关,而在第四项研究中,重量体验是目标产品评价本身的一部分。这些研究结果一致、可靠,具有理论和管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The price is Heavy: How the haptic sensation of weight influences preference for partitioned versus combined pricing

This research makes a novel proposition that the haptic sensation of weight can moderate the effect of price framing on consumer decisions. Participants who experienced heaviness (lightness) preferred a target product presented in terms of combined (partitioned) versus partitioned (combined) pricing frames. This effect was further mediated by ease of processing. Four studies (three laboratory and one field experiment) were conducted to test the key hypotheses and provide evidence for causality and external validity. Across the four studies, the haptic sensation of weight was manipulated through semantics (Studies 1, 3), embodied experience (Study 2), and part of the product experience (Study 4). In studies 1, 2 and 3, the haptic experience of weight was independent of the target product evaluation, whereas in the fourth study, the weight experience was part of the target product evaluation itself. The findings across the studies are consistent, robust, and have theoretical and managerial implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Crafting through financially demanding times: An entrepreneurial perspective Pay today, or delay the pay: Consumer preference for double flat-rate pricing plans Leveraging customer knowledge obtained through social media: The roles of R&D intensity and absorptive capacity Does the CEO effect differ in times of crisis? Evidence from US and China during the global financial crisis The shaping of marketplace moral sentiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1