测量左心室射血分数的最小剂量 CT 以及与胸部-腹部-骨盆 CT 的组合

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100583
Martin Weber Kusk , Søren Hess , Oke Gerke , Lone Deibjerg Kristensen , Christina Stolzenburg Oxlund , Tina Elisabeth Ormstrup , Janus Mølgaard Christiansen , Shane J. Foley
{"title":"测量左心室射血分数的最小剂量 CT 以及与胸部-腹部-骨盆 CT 的组合","authors":"Martin Weber Kusk ,&nbsp;Søren Hess ,&nbsp;Oke Gerke ,&nbsp;Lone Deibjerg Kristensen ,&nbsp;Christina Stolzenburg Oxlund ,&nbsp;Tina Elisabeth Ormstrup ,&nbsp;Janus Mølgaard Christiansen ,&nbsp;Shane J. Foley","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This prospective study tested the diagnostic accuracy, and absolute agreement with MRI of a low-dose CT protocol for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. Furthermore we assessed its potential for combining it with Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis CT (CAP-CT) for a one-stop examination.</p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; methods</h3><p>Eighty-two patients underwent helical low-dose CT. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the reference standard. In fifty patients, CAP-CT was performed concurrently, using a modified injection protocol. In these, LVEF was measured with radioisotope cardiography (MUGA). Patients &gt;18 years, without contrast media or MRI contraindications, were included. Bias was measured with Bland-Altman analysis, classification accuracy with Receiver Operating Characteristics, and inter-reader agreement with Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Correlation was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. CAP image quality was compared to previous scans with visual grading characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean CT dose-length-product (DLP) was 51.8 mGycm, for an estimated effective dose of 1.4 mSv, compared to 5.7 mSv for MUGA. CT LVEF bias was between 2 % and 10 %, overestimating end-diastolic volume. When corrected for bias, sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 98.5 % for classifying reduced LVEF (50 % MRI value) was achieved. ICC for MUGA was significantly lower than MRI and CT. Distinction of renal medulla and cortex was reduced in the CAP scan, but proportion of diagnostic scans was not significantly different from standard protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When corrected for inter-modality bias, CT classifies patients with reduced LVEF with high accuracy at a quarter of MUGA dose and can be combined with CAP-CT without loss of diagnostic quality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000388/pdfft?md5=d3624d446dfd93a7467c41937a54a97b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000388-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal dose CT for left ventricular ejection fraction and combination with chest-abdomen-pelvis CT\",\"authors\":\"Martin Weber Kusk ,&nbsp;Søren Hess ,&nbsp;Oke Gerke ,&nbsp;Lone Deibjerg Kristensen ,&nbsp;Christina Stolzenburg Oxlund ,&nbsp;Tina Elisabeth Ormstrup ,&nbsp;Janus Mølgaard Christiansen ,&nbsp;Shane J. Foley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This prospective study tested the diagnostic accuracy, and absolute agreement with MRI of a low-dose CT protocol for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. Furthermore we assessed its potential for combining it with Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis CT (CAP-CT) for a one-stop examination.</p></div><div><h3>Materials &amp; methods</h3><p>Eighty-two patients underwent helical low-dose CT. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the reference standard. In fifty patients, CAP-CT was performed concurrently, using a modified injection protocol. In these, LVEF was measured with radioisotope cardiography (MUGA). Patients &gt;18 years, without contrast media or MRI contraindications, were included. Bias was measured with Bland-Altman analysis, classification accuracy with Receiver Operating Characteristics, and inter-reader agreement with Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Correlation was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. CAP image quality was compared to previous scans with visual grading characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean CT dose-length-product (DLP) was 51.8 mGycm, for an estimated effective dose of 1.4 mSv, compared to 5.7 mSv for MUGA. CT LVEF bias was between 2 % and 10 %, overestimating end-diastolic volume. When corrected for bias, sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 98.5 % for classifying reduced LVEF (50 % MRI value) was achieved. ICC for MUGA was significantly lower than MRI and CT. Distinction of renal medulla and cortex was reduced in the CAP scan, but proportion of diagnostic scans was not significantly different from standard protocol.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When corrected for inter-modality bias, CT classifies patients with reduced LVEF with high accuracy at a quarter of MUGA dose and can be combined with CAP-CT without loss of diagnostic quality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000388/pdfft?md5=d3624d446dfd93a7467c41937a54a97b&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000388-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项前瞻性研究测试了低剂量 CT 方案用于测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)的诊断准确性以及与核磁共振成像(MRI)的绝对一致性。此外,我们还评估了其与胸腹盆CT(CAP-CT)结合进行一站式检查的潜力。心脏磁共振成像(MRI)是参考标准。在 50 名患者中,使用改进的注射方案同时进行了 CAP-CT 检查。在这些患者中,用放射性同位素心脏造影术(MUGA)测量了 LVEF。患者年龄为 18 岁,无造影剂或核磁共振禁忌症。偏差用 Bland-Altman 分析法进行测量,分类准确性用接收器工作特征(Receiver Operating Characteristics)进行测量,阅读器之间的一致性用类内相关系数(ICC)进行测量。相关性采用皮尔逊相关系数进行检验。结果平均 CT 剂量-长度-积(DLP)为 51.8 mGycm,估计有效剂量为 1.4 mSv,而 MUGA 为 5.7 mSv。CT LVEF偏差在2%到10%之间,高估了舒张末期容积。校正偏差后,对 LVEF 降低(MRI 值的 50%)进行分类的灵敏度和特异度分别为 100% 和 98.5%。MUGA 的 ICC 明显低于 MRI 和 CT。结论:在校正了模式间偏差后,CT 对 LVEF 降低的患者进行分类的准确率很高,只需 MUGA 剂量的四分之一,并且可以与 CAP-CT 结合使用,而不会降低诊断质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimal dose CT for left ventricular ejection fraction and combination with chest-abdomen-pelvis CT

Objectives

This prospective study tested the diagnostic accuracy, and absolute agreement with MRI of a low-dose CT protocol for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. Furthermore we assessed its potential for combining it with Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis CT (CAP-CT) for a one-stop examination.

Materials & methods

Eighty-two patients underwent helical low-dose CT. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was the reference standard. In fifty patients, CAP-CT was performed concurrently, using a modified injection protocol. In these, LVEF was measured with radioisotope cardiography (MUGA). Patients >18 years, without contrast media or MRI contraindications, were included. Bias was measured with Bland-Altman analysis, classification accuracy with Receiver Operating Characteristics, and inter-reader agreement with Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Correlation was examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients. CAP image quality was compared to previous scans with visual grading characteristics.

Results

The mean CT dose-length-product (DLP) was 51.8 mGycm, for an estimated effective dose of 1.4 mSv, compared to 5.7 mSv for MUGA. CT LVEF bias was between 2 % and 10 %, overestimating end-diastolic volume. When corrected for bias, sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 98.5 % for classifying reduced LVEF (50 % MRI value) was achieved. ICC for MUGA was significantly lower than MRI and CT. Distinction of renal medulla and cortex was reduced in the CAP scan, but proportion of diagnostic scans was not significantly different from standard protocol.

Conclusion

When corrected for inter-modality bias, CT classifies patients with reduced LVEF with high accuracy at a quarter of MUGA dose and can be combined with CAP-CT without loss of diagnostic quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1