两性之间的讨价还价:狩猎采集家庭的外部选择和闲暇时间

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Evolution and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.05.003
Angarika Deb , Daniel Saunders , Daniel Major-Smith , Mark Dyble , Abigail E. Page , Gul Deniz Salali , Andrea B. Migliano , Christophe Heintz , Nikhil Chaudhary
{"title":"两性之间的讨价还价:狩猎采集家庭的外部选择和闲暇时间","authors":"Angarika Deb ,&nbsp;Daniel Saunders ,&nbsp;Daniel Major-Smith ,&nbsp;Mark Dyble ,&nbsp;Abigail E. Page ,&nbsp;Gul Deniz Salali ,&nbsp;Andrea B. Migliano ,&nbsp;Christophe Heintz ,&nbsp;Nikhil Chaudhary","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We discuss gendered division of labour in nuclear households as a bargaining problem, where male and female partners bargain over labour inputs and resulting leisure time. We hypothesize that outside options - an individual's fallback options for welfare outside their household, such as kin support - affects this bargaining process, providing those with greater outside options more leverage to bargain for leisure time. In two hunter-gatherer populations, the BaYaka and Agta, we take social capital as the determinant of outside options, using a generative model of the Nash bargaining problem and Bayesian multilevel logistic regression to test our hypothesis. We find no evidence for an association between social capital and division of leisure in either population. Instead, we find remarkable equality in the division of leisure time within households. We suggest the potential role of sex-egalitarian norms, non-substitutability of subsistence labour, bilocality and behaviours which maintain gender equality in immediate-return hunter-gatherers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"45 4","pages":"Article 106589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000527/pdfft?md5=af7dadf048a69795bbe67b9c48920615&pid=1-s2.0-S1090513824000527-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bargaining between the sexes: outside options and leisure time in hunter-gatherer households\",\"authors\":\"Angarika Deb ,&nbsp;Daniel Saunders ,&nbsp;Daniel Major-Smith ,&nbsp;Mark Dyble ,&nbsp;Abigail E. Page ,&nbsp;Gul Deniz Salali ,&nbsp;Andrea B. Migliano ,&nbsp;Christophe Heintz ,&nbsp;Nikhil Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We discuss gendered division of labour in nuclear households as a bargaining problem, where male and female partners bargain over labour inputs and resulting leisure time. We hypothesize that outside options - an individual's fallback options for welfare outside their household, such as kin support - affects this bargaining process, providing those with greater outside options more leverage to bargain for leisure time. In two hunter-gatherer populations, the BaYaka and Agta, we take social capital as the determinant of outside options, using a generative model of the Nash bargaining problem and Bayesian multilevel logistic regression to test our hypothesis. We find no evidence for an association between social capital and division of leisure in either population. Instead, we find remarkable equality in the division of leisure time within households. We suggest the potential role of sex-egalitarian norms, non-substitutability of subsistence labour, bilocality and behaviours which maintain gender equality in immediate-return hunter-gatherers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 106589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000527/pdfft?md5=af7dadf048a69795bbe67b9c48920615&pid=1-s2.0-S1090513824000527-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000527\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000527","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将核心家庭中的性别分工作为一个讨价还价的问题来讨论,在这个问题中,男性和女性伴侣就劳动投入和由此产生的闲暇时间进行讨价还价。我们假设,外部选择--个人在家庭之外的福利后备选择(如亲属支持)--会影响这一讨价还价过程,为那些拥有更多外部选择的人提供更多讨价还价的筹码。在两个狩猎采集人群(巴雅卡人和阿格塔人)中,我们将社会资本作为外部选择的决定因素,使用纳什讨价还价问题的生成模型和贝叶斯多层次逻辑回归来检验我们的假设。在这两个人群中,我们都没有发现社会资本与闲暇分配之间存在关联的证据。相反,我们发现家庭内部的闲暇时间分配非常平等。我们认为,性别平等规范、生计劳动的不可替代性、双亲性和行为等因素可能会在即时返回的狩猎采集者中起到维护性别平等的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bargaining between the sexes: outside options and leisure time in hunter-gatherer households

We discuss gendered division of labour in nuclear households as a bargaining problem, where male and female partners bargain over labour inputs and resulting leisure time. We hypothesize that outside options - an individual's fallback options for welfare outside their household, such as kin support - affects this bargaining process, providing those with greater outside options more leverage to bargain for leisure time. In two hunter-gatherer populations, the BaYaka and Agta, we take social capital as the determinant of outside options, using a generative model of the Nash bargaining problem and Bayesian multilevel logistic regression to test our hypothesis. We find no evidence for an association between social capital and division of leisure in either population. Instead, we find remarkable equality in the division of leisure time within households. We suggest the potential role of sex-egalitarian norms, non-substitutability of subsistence labour, bilocality and behaviours which maintain gender equality in immediate-return hunter-gatherers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
期刊最新文献
Genetic markers of cousin marriage and honour cultures Even small differences in attractiveness and formidability affect the probability and speed of selection: An online study and an offline replication Deep neural networks generate facial metrics that overcome limitations of previous methods and predict in-person attraction Sex differences in close friendships and social style Perceptions of facial trustworthiness and dominance modulate early neural responses to male facial sexual dimorphism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1