共享交通对地铁乘客的影响:共享单车和打车服务的非线性效应

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100842
Fan Gao , Sylvia Y. He , Chunyang Han , Jian Liang
{"title":"共享交通对地铁乘客的影响:共享单车和打车服务的非线性效应","authors":"Fan Gao ,&nbsp;Sylvia Y. He ,&nbsp;Chunyang Han ,&nbsp;Jian Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the relationship between the emerging shared mobility and the metro is essential for their successful integration. Although several studies have examined specific shared mobility modes individually, the differences between these modes in terms of integration with the metro system have largely been neglected. We address this research gap by investigating the impact of bike-sharing and ride-hailing on metro ridership, using a comprehensive dataset collected in Shenzhen. We also conduct a comparative analysis of these two shared mobility modes based on temporal and spatial dimensions and proximity to job centers. Our results are as follows. 1) Metro-integrated bike-sharing trips are most highly concentrated in commuting hours, primarily near downtown stations, and in areas with easy access to the metro system, while metro-integrated ride-hailing trips demonstrate a more even distribution between morning and evening and are more closely associated with job centers, especially those with inadequate metro service coverage. 2) Compared with bike-sharing, ride-hailing is a more effective shared mobility mode for addressing the “first- and last-mile” issue at night and at stations located far from job centers, but bike-sharing is more complementary to the metro system during peak hours and near downtown stations. 3) The complementary effects of shared mobility are only identified within a certain range. Once the number of shared mobility arrivals exceeds a certain threshold, the effects of bike-sharing become limited and those of ride-hailing shift toward negative. Based on our findings, we provide policy recommendations for better integration of shared mobility services with the metro.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of shared mobility on metro ridership: The non-linear effects of bike-sharing and ride-hailing services\",\"authors\":\"Fan Gao ,&nbsp;Sylvia Y. He ,&nbsp;Chunyang Han ,&nbsp;Jian Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding the relationship between the emerging shared mobility and the metro is essential for their successful integration. Although several studies have examined specific shared mobility modes individually, the differences between these modes in terms of integration with the metro system have largely been neglected. We address this research gap by investigating the impact of bike-sharing and ride-hailing on metro ridership, using a comprehensive dataset collected in Shenzhen. We also conduct a comparative analysis of these two shared mobility modes based on temporal and spatial dimensions and proximity to job centers. Our results are as follows. 1) Metro-integrated bike-sharing trips are most highly concentrated in commuting hours, primarily near downtown stations, and in areas with easy access to the metro system, while metro-integrated ride-hailing trips demonstrate a more even distribution between morning and evening and are more closely associated with job centers, especially those with inadequate metro service coverage. 2) Compared with bike-sharing, ride-hailing is a more effective shared mobility mode for addressing the “first- and last-mile” issue at night and at stations located far from job centers, but bike-sharing is more complementary to the metro system during peak hours and near downtown stations. 3) The complementary effects of shared mobility are only identified within a certain range. Once the number of shared mobility arrivals exceeds a certain threshold, the effects of bike-sharing become limited and those of ride-hailing shift toward negative. Based on our findings, we provide policy recommendations for better integration of shared mobility services with the metro.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解新兴的共享交通与地铁之间的关系对于它们的成功融合至关重要。虽然有一些研究对特定的共享交通模式进行了单独研究,但这些模式在与地铁系统融合方面的差异在很大程度上被忽视了。为了填补这一研究空白,我们利用在深圳收集的综合数据集,调查了共享单车和共享汽车对地铁乘客的影响。我们还从时间和空间维度以及与就业中心的邻近程度出发,对这两种共享交通模式进行了比较分析。结果如下1)与地铁结合的共享单车出行主要集中在通勤时间段,主要集中在市中心车站附近,以及交通便利的地区;而与地铁结合的共享汽车出行在早晚分布上更为均匀,与就业中心的关系更为密切,尤其是那些地铁服务覆盖不足的地区。2) 与共享单车相比,在夜间和远离就业中心的站点,共享单车是解决 "最初和最后一英里 "问题的更有效的共享交通方式,但在高峰时段和市中心站点附近,共享单车对地铁系统的补充作用更大。3) 共享交通的互补效应只能在一定范围内识别。一旦共享出行的到达人数超过某个临界值,共享单车的效应就会变得有限,而共享出租车的效应则会转向负面。根据我们的研究结果,我们为共享交通服务与地铁更好地融合提供了政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of shared mobility on metro ridership: The non-linear effects of bike-sharing and ride-hailing services

Understanding the relationship between the emerging shared mobility and the metro is essential for their successful integration. Although several studies have examined specific shared mobility modes individually, the differences between these modes in terms of integration with the metro system have largely been neglected. We address this research gap by investigating the impact of bike-sharing and ride-hailing on metro ridership, using a comprehensive dataset collected in Shenzhen. We also conduct a comparative analysis of these two shared mobility modes based on temporal and spatial dimensions and proximity to job centers. Our results are as follows. 1) Metro-integrated bike-sharing trips are most highly concentrated in commuting hours, primarily near downtown stations, and in areas with easy access to the metro system, while metro-integrated ride-hailing trips demonstrate a more even distribution between morning and evening and are more closely associated with job centers, especially those with inadequate metro service coverage. 2) Compared with bike-sharing, ride-hailing is a more effective shared mobility mode for addressing the “first- and last-mile” issue at night and at stations located far from job centers, but bike-sharing is more complementary to the metro system during peak hours and near downtown stations. 3) The complementary effects of shared mobility are only identified within a certain range. Once the number of shared mobility arrivals exceeds a certain threshold, the effects of bike-sharing become limited and those of ride-hailing shift toward negative. Based on our findings, we provide policy recommendations for better integration of shared mobility services with the metro.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Latent class approach to classify e-scooter non-users: A comparative study of Helsinki and Tokyo Q_EDQ: Efficient path planning in multimodal travel scenarios based on reinforcement learning Analysis of emotions of online car-hailing drivers under different driving conditions and scenarios Augmenting last-mile connectivity with multimodal transport: Do choice riders favor integrated bike taxi-bus service in metro cities? New insights into factors affecting the severity of autonomous vehicle crashes from two sources of AV incident records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1