{"title":"分析评估非饱和土壤中钢筋的抗拉能力","authors":"Mahmoud Ghazavi, Abbas Mahboobi","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effective interaction mechanisms in the pullout resistance of reinforcements include skin friction mobilized at the soil-solid surface, soil-soil shear resistance, and compressive resistance created against transverse elements. The third component is obtained from passive lateral pressure (LPM) or bearing capacity (BCM) methods. An analytical solution is proposed to determine the pullout capacity of geocell, geogrid, and strengthened geogrids embedded in ordinary and unsaturated soils. For unsaturated soils, the effective stress approach was employed. The solution-predicted results were compared with those obtained from large-scale pullout tests reported in the literature. Results indicated that considering LPM for 2D and 3D reinforcements better agrees with experimental results. The mobilized frictional rib-soil interfaces and the soil-soil shear resistance components generally contribute more to the pullout capacity of the geocell and geogrid, respectively. For the extensibility represented by <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi><mspace></mspace></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> and flexibility of geocell denoted by <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>α</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>, the values of <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi><mspace></mspace></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> = 1, 0.7, and 0.3 for the first, second, and third row of geocell, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>α</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo></mrow></math></span> 0.4 for the first row of geocell and 0.25 for the second and subsequent rows are suggested to be considered. Parametric studies showed that the optimum transverse rib spacing is over 50 times the equivalent rib thickness (<em>B</em><sub><em>eq</em></sub>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"52 5","pages":"Pages 1024-1044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical assessment of pullout capacity of reinforcements in unsaturated soils\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Ghazavi, Abbas Mahboobi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effective interaction mechanisms in the pullout resistance of reinforcements include skin friction mobilized at the soil-solid surface, soil-soil shear resistance, and compressive resistance created against transverse elements. The third component is obtained from passive lateral pressure (LPM) or bearing capacity (BCM) methods. An analytical solution is proposed to determine the pullout capacity of geocell, geogrid, and strengthened geogrids embedded in ordinary and unsaturated soils. For unsaturated soils, the effective stress approach was employed. The solution-predicted results were compared with those obtained from large-scale pullout tests reported in the literature. Results indicated that considering LPM for 2D and 3D reinforcements better agrees with experimental results. The mobilized frictional rib-soil interfaces and the soil-soil shear resistance components generally contribute more to the pullout capacity of the geocell and geogrid, respectively. For the extensibility represented by <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi><mspace></mspace></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> and flexibility of geocell denoted by <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>α</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>, the values of <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>m</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi><mspace></mspace></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> = 1, 0.7, and 0.3 for the first, second, and third row of geocell, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>α</mi><mrow><mi>p</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo></mrow></math></span> 0.4 for the first row of geocell and 0.25 for the second and subsequent rows are suggested to be considered. Parametric studies showed that the optimum transverse rib spacing is over 50 times the equivalent rib thickness (<em>B</em><sub><em>eq</em></sub>).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1024-1044\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000645\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424000645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analytical assessment of pullout capacity of reinforcements in unsaturated soils
The effective interaction mechanisms in the pullout resistance of reinforcements include skin friction mobilized at the soil-solid surface, soil-soil shear resistance, and compressive resistance created against transverse elements. The third component is obtained from passive lateral pressure (LPM) or bearing capacity (BCM) methods. An analytical solution is proposed to determine the pullout capacity of geocell, geogrid, and strengthened geogrids embedded in ordinary and unsaturated soils. For unsaturated soils, the effective stress approach was employed. The solution-predicted results were compared with those obtained from large-scale pullout tests reported in the literature. Results indicated that considering LPM for 2D and 3D reinforcements better agrees with experimental results. The mobilized frictional rib-soil interfaces and the soil-soil shear resistance components generally contribute more to the pullout capacity of the geocell and geogrid, respectively. For the extensibility represented by and flexibility of geocell denoted by , the values of = 1, 0.7, and 0.3 for the first, second, and third row of geocell, 0.4 for the first row of geocell and 0.25 for the second and subsequent rows are suggested to be considered. Parametric studies showed that the optimum transverse rib spacing is over 50 times the equivalent rib thickness (Beq).
期刊介绍:
The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.