改进的向海边界条件对冲击波引起的摩擦斜冲过程的影响

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104566
Jun Zeng , Haijiang Liu
{"title":"改进的向海边界条件对冲击波引起的摩擦斜冲过程的影响","authors":"Jun Zeng ,&nbsp;Haijiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following Antuono (2010), a frictional shock wave model with an improved seaward boundary condition (ISBC) was developed to simulate the bore-driven swash hydrodynamics in this study. It is found that bottom friction has a negligible effect when the shock wave propagates towards the original shoreline, whereas it plays important roles in the area near the swash tip and during the backwash. The ISBC increases the swash water depth and the onshore flow velocity, whereas it decreases the flow velocity during the backwash stage, thus the bottom friction effect. A comparison between the present shock wave model and the dam-break model was conducted, which indicates that these two models present similar swash hydrodynamics if the traditional seaward boundary condition is applied, whereas modifications of the water depth and flow velocity under different ISBCs are less significant for the present shock wave model compared to the dam-break model. Swash excursion increases with the ISBC in the shock wave model, which however keeps uniform in the dam-break model. Subsequently, model validation was conducted with respect to the experimental data of Kikkert et al. (2012). Comparing with the dam-break model result, swash hydrodynamics (water depth and flow velocity) in the uprush and early backwash stages could be better reproduced by the present shock wave model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 104566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the influence of the improved seaward boundary condition on the shock wave induced frictional swash process\",\"authors\":\"Jun Zeng ,&nbsp;Haijiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Following Antuono (2010), a frictional shock wave model with an improved seaward boundary condition (ISBC) was developed to simulate the bore-driven swash hydrodynamics in this study. It is found that bottom friction has a negligible effect when the shock wave propagates towards the original shoreline, whereas it plays important roles in the area near the swash tip and during the backwash. The ISBC increases the swash water depth and the onshore flow velocity, whereas it decreases the flow velocity during the backwash stage, thus the bottom friction effect. A comparison between the present shock wave model and the dam-break model was conducted, which indicates that these two models present similar swash hydrodynamics if the traditional seaward boundary condition is applied, whereas modifications of the water depth and flow velocity under different ISBCs are less significant for the present shock wave model compared to the dam-break model. Swash excursion increases with the ISBC in the shock wave model, which however keeps uniform in the dam-break model. Subsequently, model validation was conducted with respect to the experimental data of Kikkert et al. (2012). Comparing with the dam-break model result, swash hydrodynamics (water depth and flow velocity) in the uprush and early backwash stages could be better reproduced by the present shock wave model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coastal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coastal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据 Antuono(2010 年)的研究,本研究开发了一个具有改进向海边界条件(ISBC)的摩擦冲击波模型,用于模拟钻孔驱动的斜流流体力学。研究发现,当冲击波向原始海岸线方向传播时,底部摩擦力的影响可以忽略不计,而在冲刷顶端附近区域和反冲刷过程中,底部摩擦力则起着重要作用。ISBC 增加了斜面水深和岸上流速,而降低了反冲阶段的流速,因此产生了底部摩擦效应。对本冲击波模型和溃坝模型进行了比较,结果表明,如果采用传统的向海边界条件,这两种模型呈现出相似的斜流流体力学特性,而与溃坝模型相比,本冲击波模型在不同 ISBC 条件下的水深和流速变化较小。在冲击波模型中,随着 ISBC 的增大,激波偏移也随之增大,而在溃坝模型中,激波偏移保持一致。随后,根据 Kikkert 等人(2012 年)的实验数据对模型进行了验证。与溃坝模型的结果相比,本冲击波模型更好地再现了上冲和早期反冲阶段的斜流水力学(水深和流速)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the influence of the improved seaward boundary condition on the shock wave induced frictional swash process

Following Antuono (2010), a frictional shock wave model with an improved seaward boundary condition (ISBC) was developed to simulate the bore-driven swash hydrodynamics in this study. It is found that bottom friction has a negligible effect when the shock wave propagates towards the original shoreline, whereas it plays important roles in the area near the swash tip and during the backwash. The ISBC increases the swash water depth and the onshore flow velocity, whereas it decreases the flow velocity during the backwash stage, thus the bottom friction effect. A comparison between the present shock wave model and the dam-break model was conducted, which indicates that these two models present similar swash hydrodynamics if the traditional seaward boundary condition is applied, whereas modifications of the water depth and flow velocity under different ISBCs are less significant for the present shock wave model compared to the dam-break model. Swash excursion increases with the ISBC in the shock wave model, which however keeps uniform in the dam-break model. Subsequently, model validation was conducted with respect to the experimental data of Kikkert et al. (2012). Comparing with the dam-break model result, swash hydrodynamics (water depth and flow velocity) in the uprush and early backwash stages could be better reproduced by the present shock wave model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of linear and nonlinear 3D semi-Lagrangian motion of moored Waverider and Spotter wave buoys Experimental study on tsunami-driven debris damming loads on columns of an elevated coastal structure A probabilistic coral rubble mechanical instability model applied with field observations from the Great Barrier reef Numerical modelling of pump-driven tsunami generation and fluid-structure-interaction in idealized urbanized coastal areas during run-up Energy balance during Bragg wave resonance by submerged porous breakwaters through a mixture theory-based δ-LES-SPH model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1