在岩石力学参数和地应力不确定的情况下,评估二氧化碳注入的安全运行包络线

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104189
Anders Nermoen , Anton Shchipanov , Michal Matloch Porzer , Jindřich Šancer , Roman Berenblyum
{"title":"在岩石力学参数和地应力不确定的情况下,评估二氧化碳注入的安全运行包络线","authors":"Anders Nermoen ,&nbsp;Anton Shchipanov ,&nbsp;Michal Matloch Porzer ,&nbsp;Jindřich Šancer ,&nbsp;Roman Berenblyum","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a pre-requisite to decarbonize CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from industrial sectors and as an industry capable of compensating for hard-to-abate emissions in a net zero scenario. A method was developed to evaluate the geomechanical constraints and safe operating envelope as function of pore pressure and temperature. The probability of failure was estimated from uncertain input stiffness and strength data, and as cooling and re-pressurization shifts the in-situ effective stresses, the safe operating envelope was determined, here given by pressure and temperature.</p><p>Onshore storages nearby industrial clusters enable energy and cost-effective handling of CO<sub>2</sub>. In the South-Eastern European region, onshore depleted oil and gas fields located nearby high-emitting industries may developed into CO<sub>2</sub> storages. This paper describes a method for determining maximum fluid pressure as function of temperature from geomechanical restrictions. The method was employed on a practical example used to evaluate the safe operation envelope for a pilot CO<sub>2</sub> injection site into a depleted onshore naturally fractured carbonate oil and gas field. The tool uses Monte Carlo simulations to perform geomechanical stability analyses by sampling from the inherent uncertainty of the input parameters to probability of failure as function of pressure and temperature. The risk of re-opening natural fractures, induced fracturing and fault reactivation are evaluated so the safe operating envelope can be obtained. The uncertainty of the input parameters is thus directly reflected in the safe operating envelope – thus providing an effective communication of value information to external stake holders when maturing a CO<sub>2</sub> storage pilot.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 104189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001324/pdfft?md5=6ecf539543f9321bd0efab358fd68ec9&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001324-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of safe operating envelope for CO2 injection under uncertain rock mechanical parameters and earth stresses\",\"authors\":\"Anders Nermoen ,&nbsp;Anton Shchipanov ,&nbsp;Michal Matloch Porzer ,&nbsp;Jindřich Šancer ,&nbsp;Roman Berenblyum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a pre-requisite to decarbonize CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from industrial sectors and as an industry capable of compensating for hard-to-abate emissions in a net zero scenario. A method was developed to evaluate the geomechanical constraints and safe operating envelope as function of pore pressure and temperature. The probability of failure was estimated from uncertain input stiffness and strength data, and as cooling and re-pressurization shifts the in-situ effective stresses, the safe operating envelope was determined, here given by pressure and temperature.</p><p>Onshore storages nearby industrial clusters enable energy and cost-effective handling of CO<sub>2</sub>. In the South-Eastern European region, onshore depleted oil and gas fields located nearby high-emitting industries may developed into CO<sub>2</sub> storages. This paper describes a method for determining maximum fluid pressure as function of temperature from geomechanical restrictions. The method was employed on a practical example used to evaluate the safe operation envelope for a pilot CO<sub>2</sub> injection site into a depleted onshore naturally fractured carbonate oil and gas field. The tool uses Monte Carlo simulations to perform geomechanical stability analyses by sampling from the inherent uncertainty of the input parameters to probability of failure as function of pressure and temperature. The risk of re-opening natural fractures, induced fracturing and fault reactivation are evaluated so the safe operating envelope can be obtained. The uncertainty of the input parameters is thus directly reflected in the safe operating envelope – thus providing an effective communication of value information to external stake holders when maturing a CO<sub>2</sub> storage pilot.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001324/pdfft?md5=6ecf539543f9321bd0efab358fd68ec9&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001324-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001324\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001324","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳捕集与封存(CCS)是工业部门二氧化碳排放去碳化的先决条件,也是能够在净零情景下补偿难以消减的排放的产业。我们开发了一种方法,用于评估地质力学约束和安全运行包络线与孔隙压力和温度的函数关系。根据不确定的输入刚度和强度数据估算出失效概率,随着冷却和再加压使原地有效应力发生变化,确定了安全运行范围,这里的安全运行范围是由压力和温度决定的。在东南欧地区,位于高排放工业附近的陆上枯竭油气田可以开发成二氧化碳储存库。本文介绍了一种根据地质力学限制确定最大流体压力与温度函数关系的方法。该方法应用于一个实际案例,用于评估一个向枯竭的陆上天然裂缝碳酸盐油气田注入二氧化碳试验场的安全运行范围。该工具使用蒙特卡洛模拟,通过从输入参数的固有不确定性到作为压力和温度函数的失效概率取样,进行地质力学稳定性分析。对重新打开天然裂缝、诱导压裂和断层再活化的风险进行评估,从而获得安全作业包络线。因此,输入参数的不确定性直接反映在安全运行包络线中,从而在二氧化碳封存试验成熟时向外部利益相关者提供有效的价值信息交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of safe operating envelope for CO2 injection under uncertain rock mechanical parameters and earth stresses

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a pre-requisite to decarbonize CO2 emissions from industrial sectors and as an industry capable of compensating for hard-to-abate emissions in a net zero scenario. A method was developed to evaluate the geomechanical constraints and safe operating envelope as function of pore pressure and temperature. The probability of failure was estimated from uncertain input stiffness and strength data, and as cooling and re-pressurization shifts the in-situ effective stresses, the safe operating envelope was determined, here given by pressure and temperature.

Onshore storages nearby industrial clusters enable energy and cost-effective handling of CO2. In the South-Eastern European region, onshore depleted oil and gas fields located nearby high-emitting industries may developed into CO2 storages. This paper describes a method for determining maximum fluid pressure as function of temperature from geomechanical restrictions. The method was employed on a practical example used to evaluate the safe operation envelope for a pilot CO2 injection site into a depleted onshore naturally fractured carbonate oil and gas field. The tool uses Monte Carlo simulations to perform geomechanical stability analyses by sampling from the inherent uncertainty of the input parameters to probability of failure as function of pressure and temperature. The risk of re-opening natural fractures, induced fracturing and fault reactivation are evaluated so the safe operating envelope can be obtained. The uncertainty of the input parameters is thus directly reflected in the safe operating envelope – thus providing an effective communication of value information to external stake holders when maturing a CO2 storage pilot.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Putting the genie back in the bottle: Decarbonizing petroleum with direct air capture and enhanced oil recovery A conceptual evaluation of the use of Ca(OH)2 for attaining carbon capture rates of 99% in the calcium looping process Determining the dominant factors controlling mineralization in three-dimensional fracture networks Conceptual design and evaluation of membrane gas separation-based CO2 recovery unit for CO2 electrolyzers employing anion exchange membranes Enhanced cation release via acid pretreatment for gigaton-scale geologic CO2 sequestration in basalt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1