Kevin Parker , Daniel J. Gaydon , Anthony Fulmore , Douglas M. Boyle
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,会计专业学生对授课方式的看法","authors":"Kevin Parker , Daniel J. Gaydon , Anthony Fulmore , Douglas M. Boyle","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The delivery mode of accounting education has become increasingly important, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employs General Systems Theory to examine accounting students’ satisfaction with various delivery modalities, comparing pre- and post-pandemic course delivery, effectiveness, and instructional support. A survey of 164 undergraduate and graduate students during Spring 2021 suggests a preference for face-to-face learning among four-year accounting majors. Associate degree-seeking participants showed higher satisfaction with online asynchronous delivery, while graduate students favored online synchronous modality. Accounting majors indicated that their online accounting instructors perceived less concern for their success and provided less effective feedback than a face-to-face accounting class. Based on these findings, academic institutions should continue offering face-to-face courses for accounting majors and enhance online delivery through targeted online course instruction training initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting Students’ perceptions of delivery modalities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Parker , Daniel J. Gaydon , Anthony Fulmore , Douglas M. Boyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The delivery mode of accounting education has become increasingly important, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employs General Systems Theory to examine accounting students’ satisfaction with various delivery modalities, comparing pre- and post-pandemic course delivery, effectiveness, and instructional support. A survey of 164 undergraduate and graduate students during Spring 2021 suggests a preference for face-to-face learning among four-year accounting majors. Associate degree-seeking participants showed higher satisfaction with online asynchronous delivery, while graduate students favored online synchronous modality. Accounting majors indicated that their online accounting instructors perceived less concern for their success and provided less effective feedback than a face-to-face accounting class. Based on these findings, academic institutions should continue offering face-to-face courses for accounting majors and enhance online delivery through targeted online course instruction training initiatives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accounting Students’ perceptions of delivery modalities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
The delivery mode of accounting education has become increasingly important, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employs General Systems Theory to examine accounting students’ satisfaction with various delivery modalities, comparing pre- and post-pandemic course delivery, effectiveness, and instructional support. A survey of 164 undergraduate and graduate students during Spring 2021 suggests a preference for face-to-face learning among four-year accounting majors. Associate degree-seeking participants showed higher satisfaction with online asynchronous delivery, while graduate students favored online synchronous modality. Accounting majors indicated that their online accounting instructors perceived less concern for their success and provided less effective feedback than a face-to-face accounting class. Based on these findings, academic institutions should continue offering face-to-face courses for accounting majors and enhance online delivery through targeted online course instruction training initiatives.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.