在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,会计专业学生对授课方式的看法

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100913
Kevin Parker , Daniel J. Gaydon , Anthony Fulmore , Douglas M. Boyle
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,会计专业学生对授课方式的看法","authors":"Kevin Parker ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Gaydon ,&nbsp;Anthony Fulmore ,&nbsp;Douglas M. Boyle","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The delivery mode of accounting education has become increasingly important, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employs General Systems Theory to examine accounting students’ satisfaction with various delivery modalities, comparing pre- and post-pandemic course delivery, effectiveness, and instructional support. A survey of 164 undergraduate and graduate students during Spring 2021 suggests a preference for face-to-face learning among four-year accounting majors. Associate degree-seeking participants showed higher satisfaction with online asynchronous delivery, while graduate students favored online synchronous modality. Accounting majors indicated that their online accounting instructors perceived less concern for their success and provided less effective feedback than a face-to-face accounting class. Based on these findings, academic institutions should continue offering face-to-face courses for accounting majors and enhance online delivery through targeted online course instruction training initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accounting Students’ perceptions of delivery modalities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Parker ,&nbsp;Daniel J. Gaydon ,&nbsp;Anthony Fulmore ,&nbsp;Douglas M. Boyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The delivery mode of accounting education has become increasingly important, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employs General Systems Theory to examine accounting students’ satisfaction with various delivery modalities, comparing pre- and post-pandemic course delivery, effectiveness, and instructional support. A survey of 164 undergraduate and graduate students during Spring 2021 suggests a preference for face-to-face learning among four-year accounting majors. Associate degree-seeking participants showed higher satisfaction with online asynchronous delivery, while graduate students favored online synchronous modality. Accounting majors indicated that their online accounting instructors perceived less concern for their success and provided less effective feedback than a face-to-face accounting class. Based on these findings, academic institutions should continue offering face-to-face courses for accounting majors and enhance online delivery through targeted online course instruction training initiatives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

会计教育的授课模式变得越来越重要,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行之后。本研究采用一般系统理论来考察会计专业学生对各种授课方式的满意度,比较大流行前后的课程授课方式、效果和教学支持。2021 年春季对 164 名本科生和研究生进行的调查表明,四年制会计专业的学生更喜欢面授学习。申请副学士学位的学生对在线异步教学的满意度较高,而研究生则更喜欢在线同步教学模式。会计专业的学生表示,与面对面的会计课相比,在线会计教师对他们的成功关注较少,提供的反馈也不太有效。基于这些研究结果,学术机构应继续为会计专业学生提供面授课程,并通过有针对性的在线课程教学培训活动来加强在线教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accounting Students’ perceptions of delivery modalities during and after the COVID-19 pandemic

The delivery mode of accounting education has become increasingly important, especially following the COVID-19 pandemic. This study employs General Systems Theory to examine accounting students’ satisfaction with various delivery modalities, comparing pre- and post-pandemic course delivery, effectiveness, and instructional support. A survey of 164 undergraduate and graduate students during Spring 2021 suggests a preference for face-to-face learning among four-year accounting majors. Associate degree-seeking participants showed higher satisfaction with online asynchronous delivery, while graduate students favored online synchronous modality. Accounting majors indicated that their online accounting instructors perceived less concern for their success and provided less effective feedback than a face-to-face accounting class. Based on these findings, academic institutions should continue offering face-to-face courses for accounting majors and enhance online delivery through targeted online course instruction training initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1