气候变化与公共卫生:地方政府评估框架

IF 2.2 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health in Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100524
E.S. Loud , G.R. Woolf , A. Ralph , T. Gadhia , A.M.D. Navaratnam , L. Watson , A. McGushin , E. Clissold , B. Hilton
{"title":"气候变化与公共卫生:地方政府评估框架","authors":"E.S. Loud ,&nbsp;G.R. Woolf ,&nbsp;A. Ralph ,&nbsp;T. Gadhia ,&nbsp;A.M.D. Navaratnam ,&nbsp;L. Watson ,&nbsp;A. McGushin ,&nbsp;E. Clissold ,&nbsp;B. Hilton","doi":"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop and pilot an evaluation framework for assessing the engagement of local government public health teams in England on climate change and sustainability. These teams are uniquely positioned to address local health impacts of climate change and promote health co-benefits of mitigation. No statutory framework currently exists to support their engagement in this agenda.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Literature review and two cross sectional surveys.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A group of public health professionals conducted a literature review and agreed on criteria based on statutory responsibilities and remit of these teams, available information, and opportunities for local government action. With the resulting framework, this group evaluated all 11 local governments in the East of England region, and then conducted a follow-up survey to assess the framework’s impact and acceptability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An evaluation framework was developed with 21 criteria in two sections. The first assessed overall local government action and leadership in climate change and sustainability, to understand the context in which the public health team was situated. The second assessed the climate change related actions undertaken by the public health team.</p><p>All 11 local governments in the East of England region completed the evaluation. Results indicated inconsistencies in local public health team action on and engagement with climate change and health. Ten local governments completed the follow-up survey on acceptability and impact, reporting that the evaluation was easy to complete. Seven out of ten respondents found that the evaluation had influenced change or reflection within their organisation, for example through identifying gaps and prompting more collaboration between teams.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This evaluation framework is a useful and acceptable tool to assess local government public health engagement and leadership on climate change and sustainability. If used more widely, it could help to support public health teams to advance much-needed action in this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34141,"journal":{"name":"Public Health in Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000612/pdfft?md5=ea09d3beea134fe02276a6a0fbbb286b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000612-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate change and public health: An evaluation framework for local government\",\"authors\":\"E.S. Loud ,&nbsp;G.R. Woolf ,&nbsp;A. Ralph ,&nbsp;T. Gadhia ,&nbsp;A.M.D. Navaratnam ,&nbsp;L. Watson ,&nbsp;A. McGushin ,&nbsp;E. Clissold ,&nbsp;B. Hilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop and pilot an evaluation framework for assessing the engagement of local government public health teams in England on climate change and sustainability. These teams are uniquely positioned to address local health impacts of climate change and promote health co-benefits of mitigation. No statutory framework currently exists to support their engagement in this agenda.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Literature review and two cross sectional surveys.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A group of public health professionals conducted a literature review and agreed on criteria based on statutory responsibilities and remit of these teams, available information, and opportunities for local government action. With the resulting framework, this group evaluated all 11 local governments in the East of England region, and then conducted a follow-up survey to assess the framework’s impact and acceptability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An evaluation framework was developed with 21 criteria in two sections. The first assessed overall local government action and leadership in climate change and sustainability, to understand the context in which the public health team was situated. The second assessed the climate change related actions undertaken by the public health team.</p><p>All 11 local governments in the East of England region completed the evaluation. Results indicated inconsistencies in local public health team action on and engagement with climate change and health. Ten local governments completed the follow-up survey on acceptability and impact, reporting that the evaluation was easy to complete. Seven out of ten respondents found that the evaluation had influenced change or reflection within their organisation, for example through identifying gaps and prompting more collaboration between teams.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This evaluation framework is a useful and acceptable tool to assess local government public health engagement and leadership on climate change and sustainability. If used more widely, it could help to support public health teams to advance much-needed action in this area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000612/pdfft?md5=ea09d3beea134fe02276a6a0fbbb286b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666535224000612-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666535224000612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标制定并试行一个评估框架,用于评估英格兰地方政府公共卫生团队在气候变化和可持续性方面的参与情况。这些团队在应对气候变化对当地健康的影响和促进减缓气候变化对健康的共同益处方面具有独特的优势。研究设计文献综述和两项横断面调查方法一组公共卫生专业人士进行了文献综述,并根据这些团队的法定职责和职权范围、可用信息以及地方政府行动的机会,就相关标准达成了一致意见。该小组利用由此产生的框架对英格兰东部地区的所有 11 个地方政府进行了评估,然后进行了一项后续调查,以评估该框架的影响和可接受性。第一部分评估了地方政府在气候变化和可持续发展方面的整体行动和领导力,以了解公共卫生团队所处的环境。第二部分评估了公共卫生团队采取的与气候变化相关的行动。英格兰东部地区的所有 11 个地方政府都完成了评估。结果表明,地方公共卫生团队在气候变化与健康方面的行动和参与不一致。十个地方政府完成了关于可接受性和影响的后续调查,并表示评估工作很容易完成。十位受访者中有七位认为,评估影响了其组织内部的变革或反思,例如通过找出差距和促进团队之间的更多合作。结论该评估框架是一个有用且可接受的工具,可用于评估地方政府在气候变化和可持续性方面的公共卫生参与和领导力。如果得到更广泛的应用,它将有助于支持公共卫生团队推进该领域急需的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Climate change and public health: An evaluation framework for local government

Objectives

To develop and pilot an evaluation framework for assessing the engagement of local government public health teams in England on climate change and sustainability. These teams are uniquely positioned to address local health impacts of climate change and promote health co-benefits of mitigation. No statutory framework currently exists to support their engagement in this agenda.

Study design

Literature review and two cross sectional surveys.

Methods

A group of public health professionals conducted a literature review and agreed on criteria based on statutory responsibilities and remit of these teams, available information, and opportunities for local government action. With the resulting framework, this group evaluated all 11 local governments in the East of England region, and then conducted a follow-up survey to assess the framework’s impact and acceptability.

Results

An evaluation framework was developed with 21 criteria in two sections. The first assessed overall local government action and leadership in climate change and sustainability, to understand the context in which the public health team was situated. The second assessed the climate change related actions undertaken by the public health team.

All 11 local governments in the East of England region completed the evaluation. Results indicated inconsistencies in local public health team action on and engagement with climate change and health. Ten local governments completed the follow-up survey on acceptability and impact, reporting that the evaluation was easy to complete. Seven out of ten respondents found that the evaluation had influenced change or reflection within their organisation, for example through identifying gaps and prompting more collaboration between teams.

Conclusions

This evaluation framework is a useful and acceptable tool to assess local government public health engagement and leadership on climate change and sustainability. If used more widely, it could help to support public health teams to advance much-needed action in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health in Practice
Public Health in Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
117
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the dispensing of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) in Ireland: A population based study Association between child marriage and high blood glucose level in women: A birth cohort analysis Reaching national Covid-19 vaccination targets whilst decreasing inequalities in vaccine uptake: Public health teams' challenges in supporting disadvantaged populations Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England Young, deprived women are more at risk of testing positive for Chlamydia trachomatis: Results from a cross-sectional multicentre study in French health examination centres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1