类比环境中的联合办公空间为何在 COVID-19 冲击下表现出不同的恢复能力?来自中国的证据

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Innovation & Knowledge Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100508
Wanyue Wei , Zheng He , Guangming Xiang
{"title":"类比环境中的联合办公空间为何在 COVID-19 冲击下表现出不同的恢复能力?来自中国的证据","authors":"Wanyue Wei ,&nbsp;Zheng He ,&nbsp;Guangming Xiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although co-working spaces have attracted significant attention as a type of platform organisation in the sharing economy, little is known about why some spaces faced with an analogical environment demonstrate obvious differences in recovery abilities after sudden shocks, such as the one caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand this novel phenomenon, we collected data from the Chengdu high-tech zone and employed grounded theory and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the possible causal configurations for high levels of resilience in small and medium-sized platform organisations. Our findings reveal that (1) there are five antecedent configurations that multi-morphologically lead to the same outcome; (2) compared with other antecedent conditions, networking ability and diverse value co-creation with customers play more important roles in the formation of a high level of co-working spaces’ resilience; (3) under certain circumstances, a substitutional relationship exists between industrial experience and communication ability; and (4) when the endogenous factors of organisations (e.g. their abilities and resources) coincide with complex external environments, organisational resilience is expressed. In this manner, our study contributes to the organisational resilience literature and research on co-working spaces. Some practical suggestions for the sustainable development of co-working spaces are also provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000477/pdfft?md5=707e61af497e12e1c4fd9f9fe9f83b04&pid=1-s2.0-S2444569X24000477-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why co-working spaces in an analogical environment exhibit different recovery abilities under the COVID-19 shock? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Wanyue Wei ,&nbsp;Zheng He ,&nbsp;Guangming Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jik.2024.100508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although co-working spaces have attracted significant attention as a type of platform organisation in the sharing economy, little is known about why some spaces faced with an analogical environment demonstrate obvious differences in recovery abilities after sudden shocks, such as the one caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand this novel phenomenon, we collected data from the Chengdu high-tech zone and employed grounded theory and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the possible causal configurations for high levels of resilience in small and medium-sized platform organisations. Our findings reveal that (1) there are five antecedent configurations that multi-morphologically lead to the same outcome; (2) compared with other antecedent conditions, networking ability and diverse value co-creation with customers play more important roles in the formation of a high level of co-working spaces’ resilience; (3) under certain circumstances, a substitutional relationship exists between industrial experience and communication ability; and (4) when the endogenous factors of organisations (e.g. their abilities and resources) coincide with complex external environments, organisational resilience is expressed. In this manner, our study contributes to the organisational resilience literature and research on co-working spaces. Some practical suggestions for the sustainable development of co-working spaces are also provided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000477/pdfft?md5=707e61af497e12e1c4fd9f9fe9f83b04&pid=1-s2.0-S2444569X24000477-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000477\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X24000477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管联合办公空间作为共享经济中的一种平台型组织类型备受关注,但人们对一些面临类似环境的空间为何在突发冲击(如 COVID-19 大流行病造成的冲击)后表现出明显的恢复能力差异知之甚少。为了解这一新颖现象,我们收集了成都高新区的数据,并运用基础理论和模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)来确定中小型平台组织高复原力的可能因果关系。我们的研究结果表明:(1)有五种前因配置可以多形态地导致相同的结果;(2)与其他前因条件相比,网络能力和与客户的多元化价值共创在形成高水平联合办公空间韧性的过程中发挥了更重要的作用;(3)在特定情况下,行业经验与沟通能力之间存在替代关系;(4)当组织的内生因素(如组织的能力和资源)与复杂的外部环境相吻合时,组织韧性就会表现出来。通过这种方式,我们的研究为组织复原力文献和联合办公空间研究做出了贡献。此外,我们还为联合办公空间的可持续发展提供了一些实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why co-working spaces in an analogical environment exhibit different recovery abilities under the COVID-19 shock? Evidence from China

Although co-working spaces have attracted significant attention as a type of platform organisation in the sharing economy, little is known about why some spaces faced with an analogical environment demonstrate obvious differences in recovery abilities after sudden shocks, such as the one caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. To understand this novel phenomenon, we collected data from the Chengdu high-tech zone and employed grounded theory and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify the possible causal configurations for high levels of resilience in small and medium-sized platform organisations. Our findings reveal that (1) there are five antecedent configurations that multi-morphologically lead to the same outcome; (2) compared with other antecedent conditions, networking ability and diverse value co-creation with customers play more important roles in the formation of a high level of co-working spaces’ resilience; (3) under certain circumstances, a substitutional relationship exists between industrial experience and communication ability; and (4) when the endogenous factors of organisations (e.g. their abilities and resources) coincide with complex external environments, organisational resilience is expressed. In this manner, our study contributes to the organisational resilience literature and research on co-working spaces. Some practical suggestions for the sustainable development of co-working spaces are also provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
期刊最新文献
Configurations of resourceful and demanding attributes of organizational culture in US hotels: An innovative approach using topic modeling and fsQCA Seeding young entrepreneurs: The role of business incubators Exploring the other side of innovative managerial decision-making: Emotions Addressing barriers to big data implementation in sustainable smart cities: Improved zero-sum grey game and grey best-worst method Contribution of female inventors to technological collaboration between high-tech firms and university in close proximity: Effect of innovative firm's characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1