通过蒙特卡洛法对稀薄气体原型流动和传热问题中的 Cercignani - Lampis 调节系数进行敏感性分析

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2024.05.003
Thanasis Basdanis, Giorgos Tatsios , Dimitris Valougeorgis
{"title":"通过蒙特卡洛法对稀薄气体原型流动和传热问题中的 Cercignani - Lampis 调节系数进行敏感性分析","authors":"Thanasis Basdanis,&nbsp;Giorgos Tatsios ,&nbsp;Dimitris Valougeorgis","doi":"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In rarefied gas dynamics, the Cercignani-Lampis (CL) scattering kernel, containing two accommodation coefficients (ACs), namely the tangential momentum and normal energy ones, is widely employed to characterize gas-surface interaction, particularly in non-isothermal setups, where both momentum and energy may simultaneously be exchanged. Here, a formal and detailed sensitivity analysis of the effect of the CL ACs on the main output quantities of several prototype problems, namely the cylindrical Poiseuille, thermal creep and thermomolecular pressure difference (TPD) flows, as well as the plane Couette flow and heat transfer (Fourier flow), is performed. In each problem, some uncertainties are randomly introduced in the ACs (input parameters) and via a Monte Carlo propagation analysis, the deduced uncertainty of the corresponding main output quantity is computed. The output uncertainties are compared to each other to determine the flow configuration and the gas rarefaction range, where a high sensitivity of the output quantities with respect to the CL ACs is observed. The flow setups and rarefaction regimes with high sensitivities are the most suitable ones for the estimations of the ACs, since larger modeling and experimental errors may be acceptable. In the Poiseuille and Couette flows, the uncertainties of the flow rate and shear stress respectively are several times larger than the input uncertainty in the tangential momentum AC and much smaller than the uncertainty in the normal energy AC in a wide range of gas rarefaction. In the thermal creep flow, the uncertainty of the flow rate depends on the input ones of both ACs, but, in general, it remains smaller than the input uncertainties. A similar behavior with the thermal creep flow is obtained in the TPD flow. On the contrary, in the Fourier flow, the uncertainty of the heat flux may be about the same or even larger than the input ones of both ACs in a wide range of gas rarefaction. It is deduced that in order to characterize the gas-surface interaction via the CL ACs by matching computations with measurements, it is more suitable to combine the Poiseuille (or Couette) and Fourier configurations, rather than, as it is commonly done, the Poiseuille and thermal creep ones. For example, in order to estimate the normal energy AC within an accuracy of 10 %, experimental uncertainties should be less than 4 % in the thermal creep or TPD flows, while may be about 10 % in the Fourier flow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11985,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000785/pdfft?md5=e292361e20a245e8bcd0fbf8f9e934aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0997754624000785-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity analysis of the Cercignani - Lampis accommodation coefficients in prototype rarefied gas flow and heat transfer problems via the Monte Carlo method\",\"authors\":\"Thanasis Basdanis,&nbsp;Giorgos Tatsios ,&nbsp;Dimitris Valougeorgis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euromechflu.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In rarefied gas dynamics, the Cercignani-Lampis (CL) scattering kernel, containing two accommodation coefficients (ACs), namely the tangential momentum and normal energy ones, is widely employed to characterize gas-surface interaction, particularly in non-isothermal setups, where both momentum and energy may simultaneously be exchanged. Here, a formal and detailed sensitivity analysis of the effect of the CL ACs on the main output quantities of several prototype problems, namely the cylindrical Poiseuille, thermal creep and thermomolecular pressure difference (TPD) flows, as well as the plane Couette flow and heat transfer (Fourier flow), is performed. In each problem, some uncertainties are randomly introduced in the ACs (input parameters) and via a Monte Carlo propagation analysis, the deduced uncertainty of the corresponding main output quantity is computed. The output uncertainties are compared to each other to determine the flow configuration and the gas rarefaction range, where a high sensitivity of the output quantities with respect to the CL ACs is observed. The flow setups and rarefaction regimes with high sensitivities are the most suitable ones for the estimations of the ACs, since larger modeling and experimental errors may be acceptable. In the Poiseuille and Couette flows, the uncertainties of the flow rate and shear stress respectively are several times larger than the input uncertainty in the tangential momentum AC and much smaller than the uncertainty in the normal energy AC in a wide range of gas rarefaction. In the thermal creep flow, the uncertainty of the flow rate depends on the input ones of both ACs, but, in general, it remains smaller than the input uncertainties. A similar behavior with the thermal creep flow is obtained in the TPD flow. On the contrary, in the Fourier flow, the uncertainty of the heat flux may be about the same or even larger than the input ones of both ACs in a wide range of gas rarefaction. It is deduced that in order to characterize the gas-surface interaction via the CL ACs by matching computations with measurements, it is more suitable to combine the Poiseuille (or Couette) and Fourier configurations, rather than, as it is commonly done, the Poiseuille and thermal creep ones. For example, in order to estimate the normal energy AC within an accuracy of 10 %, experimental uncertainties should be less than 4 % in the thermal creep or TPD flows, while may be about 10 % in the Fourier flow.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000785/pdfft?md5=e292361e20a245e8bcd0fbf8f9e934aa&pid=1-s2.0-S0997754624000785-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000785\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Mechanics B-fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754624000785","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在稀薄气体动力学中,Cercignani-Lampis(CL)散射核包含两个容纳系数(AC),即切向动量和法向能量系数,被广泛用于描述气体与表面的相互作用,特别是在非等温设置中,动量和能量可能同时交换。本文对 CL AC 对几个原型问题的主要输出量的影响进行了正式而详细的敏感性分析,这些问题包括圆柱形 Poiseuille 流、热蠕变流和热分子压差(TPD)流,以及平面 Couette 流和传热(傅立叶流)。在每个问题中,在交流(输入参数)中随机引入一些不确定性,通过蒙特卡罗传播分析,计算相应主要输出量的推导不确定性。将输出不确定性相互比较,以确定流量配置和气体稀释范围,观察到输出量对 CL AC 的高度敏感性。灵敏度高的流动设置和稀释范围最适合用于估计交流系数,因为较大的建模和实验误差是可以接受的。在 Poiseuille 流体和 Couette 流体中,流速和剪切应力的不确定性分别是切向动量不确定性输入的几倍,而远小于宽气体稀释范围内正常能量不确定性的输入。在热蠕变流中,流速的不确定性取决于两个交流器的输入不确定性,但总的来说,它仍然小于输入不确定性。在 TPD 流量中也出现了与热蠕变流量类似的情况。相反,在傅立叶流中,热通量的不确定性可能与两个交流器的输入不确定性大致相同,甚至在较大的气体稀释范围内大于输入不确定性。由此推断,为了通过 CL 交流将计算与测量相匹配来描述气体与表面的相互作用,更适合将普瓦赛(或库埃特)和傅里叶配置结合起来,而不是像通常那样将普瓦赛和热蠕变配置结合起来。例如,为了在 10% 的精度范围内估算正常能量交流,热蠕变或 TPD 流量的实验不确定性应小于 4%,而傅里叶流量的实验不确定性可能约为 10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensitivity analysis of the Cercignani - Lampis accommodation coefficients in prototype rarefied gas flow and heat transfer problems via the Monte Carlo method

In rarefied gas dynamics, the Cercignani-Lampis (CL) scattering kernel, containing two accommodation coefficients (ACs), namely the tangential momentum and normal energy ones, is widely employed to characterize gas-surface interaction, particularly in non-isothermal setups, where both momentum and energy may simultaneously be exchanged. Here, a formal and detailed sensitivity analysis of the effect of the CL ACs on the main output quantities of several prototype problems, namely the cylindrical Poiseuille, thermal creep and thermomolecular pressure difference (TPD) flows, as well as the plane Couette flow and heat transfer (Fourier flow), is performed. In each problem, some uncertainties are randomly introduced in the ACs (input parameters) and via a Monte Carlo propagation analysis, the deduced uncertainty of the corresponding main output quantity is computed. The output uncertainties are compared to each other to determine the flow configuration and the gas rarefaction range, where a high sensitivity of the output quantities with respect to the CL ACs is observed. The flow setups and rarefaction regimes with high sensitivities are the most suitable ones for the estimations of the ACs, since larger modeling and experimental errors may be acceptable. In the Poiseuille and Couette flows, the uncertainties of the flow rate and shear stress respectively are several times larger than the input uncertainty in the tangential momentum AC and much smaller than the uncertainty in the normal energy AC in a wide range of gas rarefaction. In the thermal creep flow, the uncertainty of the flow rate depends on the input ones of both ACs, but, in general, it remains smaller than the input uncertainties. A similar behavior with the thermal creep flow is obtained in the TPD flow. On the contrary, in the Fourier flow, the uncertainty of the heat flux may be about the same or even larger than the input ones of both ACs in a wide range of gas rarefaction. It is deduced that in order to characterize the gas-surface interaction via the CL ACs by matching computations with measurements, it is more suitable to combine the Poiseuille (or Couette) and Fourier configurations, rather than, as it is commonly done, the Poiseuille and thermal creep ones. For example, in order to estimate the normal energy AC within an accuracy of 10 %, experimental uncertainties should be less than 4 % in the thermal creep or TPD flows, while may be about 10 % in the Fourier flow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
127
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids publishes papers in all fields of fluid mechanics. Although investigations in well-established areas are within the scope of the journal, recent developments and innovative ideas are particularly welcome. Theoretical, computational and experimental papers are equally welcome. Mathematical methods, be they deterministic or stochastic, analytical or numerical, will be accepted provided they serve to clarify some identifiable problems in fluid mechanics, and provided the significance of results is explained. Similarly, experimental papers must add physical insight in to the understanding of fluid mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Influence of radiation on the stability of MHD micropolar fluid in a vertical channel The broad study of blade cascade under controlled torsional flutter: Dynamics of the flow and stability analysis Calendar Editorial Board Characterizing nonlinear flow dynamics in hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamic regimes through modal decomposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1