床旁注意力测试检测认知障碍老年门诊患者谵妄的准确性

D.W.P. Quispel-Aggenbach , Sytse U Zuidema , Hendrika J Luijendijk
{"title":"床旁注意力测试检测认知障碍老年门诊患者谵妄的准确性","authors":"D.W.P. Quispel-Aggenbach ,&nbsp;Sytse U Zuidema ,&nbsp;Hendrika J Luijendijk","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2024.100196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To determine the test accuracy of four observations, three explorations and four short tests commonly used in psychiatric examinations to detect attention disorders related to delirium in older outpatients.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We performed a test accuracy study among 86 older patients referred for cognitive screening to an outpatient clinic of a psychiatric institution. Eleven index tests were applied without knowledge of the reference standard. A geriatrician or psychiatrist blinded to the results of the index tests determined the reference diagnosis with DSM-IV-TR criteria. Observations were lack of adequate/ regular eye-contact, dozing off during conversation, dozing off when not stimulated, and losing the point of story. Explored was lack of concentration during activities, difficulty following conversation, and being easily distracted. Serial 7s, WORLD spelled backward, months of the year backward (MOTYB) and counting back from 20 to 0 were applied. Test accuracy was calculated for the single tests and combinations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dozing off during conversation scored high specificity (97.9 %) as did dozing off when not stimulated (97.9 %), but both had low sensitivity (&lt; 27.9 %). Test accuracy of the exploration questions was low. Serial 7s and WORLD spelled backwards had high sensitivity (92.7 %, respectively 80.5 %) but low specificity (&lt; 51.1 % %). The best combination was MOTYB with WORLD spelled backward (sensitivity of 63.4 %, specificity of 77.8 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No single observation, exploration or short test of attention was found to have both high sensitivity and specificity. Probably, attention deficits in delirium are best detected with a combination of observations and short tests as part of a comprehensive psychiatric examination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032124000179/pdfft?md5=a775706520258d311c82a0b09ad0ac9a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667032124000179-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The accuracy of bedside attention tests for delirium detection in older outpatients with cognitive impairment\",\"authors\":\"D.W.P. Quispel-Aggenbach ,&nbsp;Sytse U Zuidema ,&nbsp;Hendrika J Luijendijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahr.2024.100196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To determine the test accuracy of four observations, three explorations and four short tests commonly used in psychiatric examinations to detect attention disorders related to delirium in older outpatients.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We performed a test accuracy study among 86 older patients referred for cognitive screening to an outpatient clinic of a psychiatric institution. Eleven index tests were applied without knowledge of the reference standard. A geriatrician or psychiatrist blinded to the results of the index tests determined the reference diagnosis with DSM-IV-TR criteria. Observations were lack of adequate/ regular eye-contact, dozing off during conversation, dozing off when not stimulated, and losing the point of story. Explored was lack of concentration during activities, difficulty following conversation, and being easily distracted. Serial 7s, WORLD spelled backward, months of the year backward (MOTYB) and counting back from 20 to 0 were applied. Test accuracy was calculated for the single tests and combinations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Dozing off during conversation scored high specificity (97.9 %) as did dozing off when not stimulated (97.9 %), but both had low sensitivity (&lt; 27.9 %). Test accuracy of the exploration questions was low. Serial 7s and WORLD spelled backwards had high sensitivity (92.7 %, respectively 80.5 %) but low specificity (&lt; 51.1 % %). The best combination was MOTYB with WORLD spelled backward (sensitivity of 63.4 %, specificity of 77.8 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No single observation, exploration or short test of attention was found to have both high sensitivity and specificity. Probably, attention deficits in delirium are best detected with a combination of observations and short tests as part of a comprehensive psychiatric examination.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging and health research\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032124000179/pdfft?md5=a775706520258d311c82a0b09ad0ac9a&pid=1-s2.0-S2667032124000179-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging and health research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032124000179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667032124000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景为了确定精神科检查中常用的四项观察、三项探索和四项简短测试的测试准确性,以检测老年门诊患者与谵妄有关的注意力障碍,我们对转诊到一家精神病院门诊进行认知筛查的86名老年患者进行了测试准确性研究。在不了解参考标准的情况下进行了 11 项指标测试。老年病学家或精神病学家在对指数测试结果保密的情况下,根据 DSM-IV-TR 标准确定参考诊断。观察指标包括缺乏适当/有规律的目光接触、谈话时打瞌睡、无刺激时打瞌睡以及失去故事重点。探讨的问题包括活动时注意力不集中、难以跟上谈话内容以及容易分心。此外,还采用了连读 7、WORLD 倒拼、年月倒数(MOTYB)和从 20 数到 0 的方法。结果谈话时打瞌睡的特异性很高(97.9%),不受刺激时打瞌睡的特异性也很高(97.9%),但两者的灵敏度都很低(27.9%)。探索问题的测试准确率较低。连读 7 和 WORLD 倒拼的灵敏度较高(分别为 92.7 % 和 80.5 %),但特异性较低(51.1 %)。最佳组合是 MOTYB 和 WORLD 反向拼写(灵敏度为 63.4%,特异度为 77.8%)。作为综合精神检查的一部分,综合观察和简短测试可能是检测谵妄患者注意力缺陷的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The accuracy of bedside attention tests for delirium detection in older outpatients with cognitive impairment

Background

To determine the test accuracy of four observations, three explorations and four short tests commonly used in psychiatric examinations to detect attention disorders related to delirium in older outpatients.

Method

We performed a test accuracy study among 86 older patients referred for cognitive screening to an outpatient clinic of a psychiatric institution. Eleven index tests were applied without knowledge of the reference standard. A geriatrician or psychiatrist blinded to the results of the index tests determined the reference diagnosis with DSM-IV-TR criteria. Observations were lack of adequate/ regular eye-contact, dozing off during conversation, dozing off when not stimulated, and losing the point of story. Explored was lack of concentration during activities, difficulty following conversation, and being easily distracted. Serial 7s, WORLD spelled backward, months of the year backward (MOTYB) and counting back from 20 to 0 were applied. Test accuracy was calculated for the single tests and combinations.

Results

Dozing off during conversation scored high specificity (97.9 %) as did dozing off when not stimulated (97.9 %), but both had low sensitivity (< 27.9 %). Test accuracy of the exploration questions was low. Serial 7s and WORLD spelled backwards had high sensitivity (92.7 %, respectively 80.5 %) but low specificity (< 51.1 % %). The best combination was MOTYB with WORLD spelled backward (sensitivity of 63.4 %, specificity of 77.8 %).

Conclusions

No single observation, exploration or short test of attention was found to have both high sensitivity and specificity. Probably, attention deficits in delirium are best detected with a combination of observations and short tests as part of a comprehensive psychiatric examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interventions of cognitive impairment in older adults: A comprehensive review Evaluation of Minds in Motion, a fitness program for people living with dementia and their caregivers Premorbid and current intellectual performance reflects different backgrounds in patients with Parkinson's disease Baseline shock index and baroreflex function in older adults The deprivation cascade hypothesis of dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1