负责任的南北研究与创新:跨学科研究领导与管理框架

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105048
Matthew A. French , S. Fiona Barker , Rebekah Henry , Amelia Turagabeci , Ancha Ansariadi , Autiko Tela , Diego Ramirez-Lovering , Fitriyanty Awaluddin , Ihsan Latief , Isoa Vakarewa , Ruzka R. Taruc , Tony Wong , Brett Davis , Rebekah Brown , Karin Leder , for the RISE consortium
{"title":"负责任的南北研究与创新:跨学科研究领导与管理框架","authors":"Matthew A. French ,&nbsp;S. Fiona Barker ,&nbsp;Rebekah Henry ,&nbsp;Amelia Turagabeci ,&nbsp;Ancha Ansariadi ,&nbsp;Autiko Tela ,&nbsp;Diego Ramirez-Lovering ,&nbsp;Fitriyanty Awaluddin ,&nbsp;Ihsan Latief ,&nbsp;Isoa Vakarewa ,&nbsp;Ruzka R. Taruc ,&nbsp;Tony Wong ,&nbsp;Brett Davis ,&nbsp;Rebekah Brown ,&nbsp;Karin Leder ,&nbsp;for the RISE consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number, scale and ambition of transdisciplinary research initiatives between the global north and the global south is increasing, yet there is very little theoretical or empirical scholarship on how to lead and manage implementation to promote responsible practice. Within science, technology and innovation (STI) studies and decolonising research frameworks, and utilising collaborative autoethnography, this study codifies experience with implementing the ‘Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments’ (RISE) program (2017–2020). Our specific aim is to explore the leadership and management tensions and challenges of implementing transboundary transdisciplinary research. The findings reaffirm the importance of research leaders and managers carefully operationalising north–south research by critically reflecting on power asymmetries between disciplines, partners and locations, leveraging the potential for transdisciplinary consortia to build research capabilities in the global south, and creating a culture of reflexivity on the historical and social positionality in which research is designed, funded, implemented and evaluated. The findings foreground the role of boundary-spanning ‘integrators’ and ‘pracademics’, roles that have received little attention to date but are essential for effective delivery and societal impact beyond scientific advances. A framework for implementing north–south transdisciplinary research is outlined with five domains: (1) collaborative leadership; (2) agile management; (3) flexible consortia; (4) researcher positionality; and (5) co-design and participation. The framework can support efforts for responsibly designing and implementing large, transdisciplinary, cross-country research programs in line with ambitions for decolonising north–south research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000970/pdfft?md5=be38450ce5e36655b617c33f22e30d94&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733324000970-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsible north–south research and innovation: A framework for transdisciplinary research leadership and management\",\"authors\":\"Matthew A. French ,&nbsp;S. Fiona Barker ,&nbsp;Rebekah Henry ,&nbsp;Amelia Turagabeci ,&nbsp;Ancha Ansariadi ,&nbsp;Autiko Tela ,&nbsp;Diego Ramirez-Lovering ,&nbsp;Fitriyanty Awaluddin ,&nbsp;Ihsan Latief ,&nbsp;Isoa Vakarewa ,&nbsp;Ruzka R. Taruc ,&nbsp;Tony Wong ,&nbsp;Brett Davis ,&nbsp;Rebekah Brown ,&nbsp;Karin Leder ,&nbsp;for the RISE consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The number, scale and ambition of transdisciplinary research initiatives between the global north and the global south is increasing, yet there is very little theoretical or empirical scholarship on how to lead and manage implementation to promote responsible practice. Within science, technology and innovation (STI) studies and decolonising research frameworks, and utilising collaborative autoethnography, this study codifies experience with implementing the ‘Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments’ (RISE) program (2017–2020). Our specific aim is to explore the leadership and management tensions and challenges of implementing transboundary transdisciplinary research. The findings reaffirm the importance of research leaders and managers carefully operationalising north–south research by critically reflecting on power asymmetries between disciplines, partners and locations, leveraging the potential for transdisciplinary consortia to build research capabilities in the global south, and creating a culture of reflexivity on the historical and social positionality in which research is designed, funded, implemented and evaluated. The findings foreground the role of boundary-spanning ‘integrators’ and ‘pracademics’, roles that have received little attention to date but are essential for effective delivery and societal impact beyond scientific advances. A framework for implementing north–south transdisciplinary research is outlined with five domains: (1) collaborative leadership; (2) agile management; (3) flexible consortia; (4) researcher positionality; and (5) co-design and participation. The framework can support efforts for responsibly designing and implementing large, transdisciplinary, cross-country research programs in line with ambitions for decolonising north–south research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000970/pdfft?md5=be38450ce5e36655b617c33f22e30d94&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733324000970-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000970\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球北方和全球南方之间跨学科研究计划的数量、规模和雄心都在不断增加,但关于如何领导和管理实施工作以促进负责任的实践,却很少有理论或经验方面的学术研究。本研究在科学、技术与创新(STI)研究和非殖民化研究框架内,利用合作式自述法,对 "振兴非正规住区及其环境"(RISE)计划(2017-2020 年)的实施经验进行了编纂。我们的具体目标是探索实施跨境跨学科研究时领导和管理方面的紧张关系和挑战。研究结果重申了研究领导者和管理者通过批判性地反思学科、合作伙伴和地点之间的权力不对称,利用跨学科联合体的潜力在全球南部建立研究能力,以及在设计、资助、实施和评估研究的历史和社会地位方面创造一种反思文化的重要性。研究结果强调了跨越边界的 "整合者 "和 "实践学者 "的作用,这些角色迄今为止很少受到关注,但对于科学进步之外的有效交付和社会影响至关重要。本文概述了实施南北跨学科研究的框架,包括五个领域:(1) 合作领导;(2) 敏捷管理;(3) 灵活联合体;(4) 研究人员的地位;(5) 共同设计和参与。该框架可以为负责任地设计和实施大型跨学科跨国研究计划提供支持,从而实现南北研究非殖民化的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Responsible north–south research and innovation: A framework for transdisciplinary research leadership and management

The number, scale and ambition of transdisciplinary research initiatives between the global north and the global south is increasing, yet there is very little theoretical or empirical scholarship on how to lead and manage implementation to promote responsible practice. Within science, technology and innovation (STI) studies and decolonising research frameworks, and utilising collaborative autoethnography, this study codifies experience with implementing the ‘Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments’ (RISE) program (2017–2020). Our specific aim is to explore the leadership and management tensions and challenges of implementing transboundary transdisciplinary research. The findings reaffirm the importance of research leaders and managers carefully operationalising north–south research by critically reflecting on power asymmetries between disciplines, partners and locations, leveraging the potential for transdisciplinary consortia to build research capabilities in the global south, and creating a culture of reflexivity on the historical and social positionality in which research is designed, funded, implemented and evaluated. The findings foreground the role of boundary-spanning ‘integrators’ and ‘pracademics’, roles that have received little attention to date but are essential for effective delivery and societal impact beyond scientific advances. A framework for implementing north–south transdisciplinary research is outlined with five domains: (1) collaborative leadership; (2) agile management; (3) flexible consortia; (4) researcher positionality; and (5) co-design and participation. The framework can support efforts for responsibly designing and implementing large, transdisciplinary, cross-country research programs in line with ambitions for decolonising north–south research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Research-targeting, spillovers, and the direction of science: Evidence from HIV research-funding Unexpectedness in medical research Path release among practices in the process of path constitution: How the MP3-path appeared in the field of recorded music Missing women in STEM occupations: The impact of university education on the gender gap in graduates' transition to work Public interest v.s. special interest: The strategic framing tactics of technologies in the political arena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1