Heike H. Zimmermann, Sara Harðardóttir, Sofia Ribeiro
{"title":"评估短 18S rDNA 标记在海洋原生动物环境 DNA 代谢编码中的性能","authors":"Heike H. Zimmermann, Sara Harðardóttir, Sofia Ribeiro","doi":"10.1002/edn3.580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine protists are globally distributed and sensitive to environmental conditions, which makes them a focal group when studying the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ocean health. However, they are a highly diverse group with varying evolutionary histories and morphologies and widely variable preservation potential in the fossil record. Thus, their past diversity and composition are poorly known. Paleogenetics, which relies, among other approaches, on DNA metabarcoding of sedimentary ancient DNA (<i>sed</i>aDNA), provides a promising avenue to explore the past history and responses of marine protists to global change. Choosing the right marker for <i>sed</i>aDNA studies is critical, striking a balance between marker length and taxonomic resolution. While marker guides exist for modern environmental DNA surveys, a thorough assessment of existing short markers for <i>sed</i>aDNA studies targeting protists is lacking. In this study, we report on a comparison of in silico PCR for eight short 18S rDNA markers, including one from the Tara Oceans initiative and a longer marker commonly used in modern marine eDNA studies. We analyze their taxonomic coverage and resolution, taxonomic overlap and uniqueness between markers, co-amplification of non-protist taxa, and amplicon size differences across taxonomic groups. Additionally, we provide a detailed analysis of diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes. Our study is aimed at supporting project-specific marker choices for characterizing protist composition and diversity. While we focus on marine protists, our results are applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.580","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the performance of short 18S rDNA markers for environmental DNA metabarcoding of marine protists\",\"authors\":\"Heike H. Zimmermann, Sara Harðardóttir, Sofia Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Marine protists are globally distributed and sensitive to environmental conditions, which makes them a focal group when studying the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ocean health. However, they are a highly diverse group with varying evolutionary histories and morphologies and widely variable preservation potential in the fossil record. Thus, their past diversity and composition are poorly known. Paleogenetics, which relies, among other approaches, on DNA metabarcoding of sedimentary ancient DNA (<i>sed</i>aDNA), provides a promising avenue to explore the past history and responses of marine protists to global change. Choosing the right marker for <i>sed</i>aDNA studies is critical, striking a balance between marker length and taxonomic resolution. While marker guides exist for modern environmental DNA surveys, a thorough assessment of existing short markers for <i>sed</i>aDNA studies targeting protists is lacking. In this study, we report on a comparison of in silico PCR for eight short 18S rDNA markers, including one from the Tara Oceans initiative and a longer marker commonly used in modern marine eDNA studies. We analyze their taxonomic coverage and resolution, taxonomic overlap and uniqueness between markers, co-amplification of non-protist taxa, and amplicon size differences across taxonomic groups. Additionally, we provide a detailed analysis of diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes. Our study is aimed at supporting project-specific marker choices for characterizing protist composition and diversity. While we focus on marine protists, our results are applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.580\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
海洋原生动物分布于全球各地,对环境条件十分敏感,因此是研究气候变化对生物多样性和海洋健康影响的重点研究对象。然而,海洋原生动物种类繁多,进化历史和形态各异,在化石记录中的保存潜力也千差万别。因此,人们对它们过去的多样性和组成知之甚少。古遗传学主要依靠对沉积古 DNA(sedaDNA)进行 DNA 代谢编码,为探索海洋原生生物的过去历史和对全球变化的反应提供了一条前景广阔的途径。为沉积古 DNA 研究选择合适的标记至关重要,要在标记长度和分类分辨率之间取得平衡。虽然现代环境 DNA 调查已经有了标记指南,但针对原生动物的 sedaDNA 研究还缺乏对现有短标记的全面评估。在本研究中,我们报告了 8 个短 18S rDNA 标记的硅 PCR 比较,包括塔拉海洋计划(Tara Oceans initiative)中的一个标记和现代海洋 eDNA 研究中常用的一个较长标记。我们分析了这些标记的分类覆盖范围和分辨率、标记之间的分类重叠和独特性、非原生分类群的共扩增以及不同分类群之间的扩增子大小差异。此外,我们还对硅藻、甲藻、七彩叶藻和叶绿体进行了详细分析。我们的研究旨在支持特定项目选择标记来描述原生生物的组成和多样性。虽然我们的研究重点是海洋原生动物,但我们的结果也适用于其他水生和陆生环境。
Assessing the performance of short 18S rDNA markers for environmental DNA metabarcoding of marine protists
Marine protists are globally distributed and sensitive to environmental conditions, which makes them a focal group when studying the effects of climate change on biodiversity and ocean health. However, they are a highly diverse group with varying evolutionary histories and morphologies and widely variable preservation potential in the fossil record. Thus, their past diversity and composition are poorly known. Paleogenetics, which relies, among other approaches, on DNA metabarcoding of sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA), provides a promising avenue to explore the past history and responses of marine protists to global change. Choosing the right marker for sedaDNA studies is critical, striking a balance between marker length and taxonomic resolution. While marker guides exist for modern environmental DNA surveys, a thorough assessment of existing short markers for sedaDNA studies targeting protists is lacking. In this study, we report on a comparison of in silico PCR for eight short 18S rDNA markers, including one from the Tara Oceans initiative and a longer marker commonly used in modern marine eDNA studies. We analyze their taxonomic coverage and resolution, taxonomic overlap and uniqueness between markers, co-amplification of non-protist taxa, and amplicon size differences across taxonomic groups. Additionally, we provide a detailed analysis of diatoms, dinoflagellates, haptophytes, and chlorophytes. Our study is aimed at supporting project-specific marker choices for characterizing protist composition and diversity. While we focus on marine protists, our results are applicable to other aquatic and terrestrial environments.