{"title":"使用 Al(CH3)3/HF 进行热原子层蚀刻和使用 HF 进行自发蚀刻时 SiO2 和 SiNx 之间的选择性以及 HF + NH3 配料的影响","authors":"Marcel Junige, Steven M. George","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selectivity was examined between SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> during thermal atomic layer etching (ALE) and spontaneous etching. Thermal ALE of SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> was explored using sequential trimethylaluminum (TMA) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) with reactant exposures of 3 Torr for 45 s at 275 °C. SiO<sub>2</sub> thermal ALE achieved an etch per cycle (EPC) of 0.20 Å/cycle and near-ideal synergy up to 95%. SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> thermal ALE exhibited a higher EPC of 1.06 Å/cycle. The selectivity factor was ∼5:1 for SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> etching compared to SiO<sub>2</sub> etching (preferential SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> removal) during thermal ALE using TMA and HF. Spontaneous etching was then quantified using repeated exposures of HF vapor alone at 3 Torr and 275 °C. SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching was minor at an etch rate of 0.03 Å/min, enabling near-ideal synergy for SiO<sub>2</sub> thermal ALE. In contrast, major SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching displayed an etch rate of 1.72 Å/min and predominated over SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> thermal ALE. The selectivity factor was ∼50:1 for SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching compared to SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching using an HF pressure of 3 Torr. This selective SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching was attributed to F<sup>–</sup> surface species during HF exposures. NH<sub>3</sub> codosing with HF was then examined during thermal ALE and spontaneous etching. Thermal ALE of SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> was examined using sequential TMA and HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing with reactant exposures of 3 Torr for 45 s at 275 °C. SiO<sub>2</sub> thermal ALE with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing had a high EPC of 8.83 Å/cycle. In contrast, SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> thermal ALE with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing was negligible. The selectivity factor was reversed and much higher at >1000:1 for SiO<sub>2</sub> etching compared to SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> etching (preferential SiO<sub>2</sub> removal) during thermal ALE with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing. Rapid SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing at 3 Torr had an etch rate of 27.50 Å/min. In contrast, SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing produced a very low etch rate of 0.02 Å/min. The selectivity factor was >1000:1 for SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching compared to SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing. This selective SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching was attributed to HF<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup> surface species during HF + NH<sub>3</sub> exposures. These studies revealed that the NH<sub>3</sub> coadsorbate during HF exposures modified the active etch species and dramatically influenced the etch selectivity between SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub>. Reciprocal etch selectivity should be important for the selective removal of SiO<sub>2</sub> or SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> in composite structures.","PeriodicalId":33,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry of Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selectivity between SiO2 and SiNx during Thermal Atomic Layer Etching Using Al(CH3)3/HF and Spontaneous Etching Using HF and Effect of HF + NH3 Codosing\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Junige, Steven M. George\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Selectivity was examined between SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> during thermal atomic layer etching (ALE) and spontaneous etching. Thermal ALE of SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> was explored using sequential trimethylaluminum (TMA) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) with reactant exposures of 3 Torr for 45 s at 275 °C. SiO<sub>2</sub> thermal ALE achieved an etch per cycle (EPC) of 0.20 Å/cycle and near-ideal synergy up to 95%. SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> thermal ALE exhibited a higher EPC of 1.06 Å/cycle. The selectivity factor was ∼5:1 for SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> etching compared to SiO<sub>2</sub> etching (preferential SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> removal) during thermal ALE using TMA and HF. Spontaneous etching was then quantified using repeated exposures of HF vapor alone at 3 Torr and 275 °C. SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching was minor at an etch rate of 0.03 Å/min, enabling near-ideal synergy for SiO<sub>2</sub> thermal ALE. In contrast, major SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching displayed an etch rate of 1.72 Å/min and predominated over SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> thermal ALE. The selectivity factor was ∼50:1 for SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching compared to SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching using an HF pressure of 3 Torr. This selective SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching was attributed to F<sup>–</sup> surface species during HF exposures. NH<sub>3</sub> codosing with HF was then examined during thermal ALE and spontaneous etching. Thermal ALE of SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> was examined using sequential TMA and HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing with reactant exposures of 3 Torr for 45 s at 275 °C. SiO<sub>2</sub> thermal ALE with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing had a high EPC of 8.83 Å/cycle. In contrast, SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> thermal ALE with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing was negligible. The selectivity factor was reversed and much higher at >1000:1 for SiO<sub>2</sub> etching compared to SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> etching (preferential SiO<sub>2</sub> removal) during thermal ALE with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing. Rapid SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing at 3 Torr had an etch rate of 27.50 Å/min. In contrast, SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing produced a very low etch rate of 0.02 Å/min. The selectivity factor was >1000:1 for SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching compared to SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> spontaneous etching with HF + NH<sub>3</sub> codosing. This selective SiO<sub>2</sub> spontaneous etching was attributed to HF<sub>2</sub><sup>–</sup> surface species during HF + NH<sub>3</sub> exposures. These studies revealed that the NH<sub>3</sub> coadsorbate during HF exposures modified the active etch species and dramatically influenced the etch selectivity between SiO<sub>2</sub> and SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub>. Reciprocal etch selectivity should be important for the selective removal of SiO<sub>2</sub> or SiN<sub><i>x</i></sub> in composite structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry of Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry of Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry of Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Selectivity between SiO2 and SiNx during Thermal Atomic Layer Etching Using Al(CH3)3/HF and Spontaneous Etching Using HF and Effect of HF + NH3 Codosing
Selectivity was examined between SiO2 and SiNx during thermal atomic layer etching (ALE) and spontaneous etching. Thermal ALE of SiO2 and SiNx was explored using sequential trimethylaluminum (TMA) and hydrogen fluoride (HF) with reactant exposures of 3 Torr for 45 s at 275 °C. SiO2 thermal ALE achieved an etch per cycle (EPC) of 0.20 Å/cycle and near-ideal synergy up to 95%. SiNx thermal ALE exhibited a higher EPC of 1.06 Å/cycle. The selectivity factor was ∼5:1 for SiNx etching compared to SiO2 etching (preferential SiNx removal) during thermal ALE using TMA and HF. Spontaneous etching was then quantified using repeated exposures of HF vapor alone at 3 Torr and 275 °C. SiO2 spontaneous etching was minor at an etch rate of 0.03 Å/min, enabling near-ideal synergy for SiO2 thermal ALE. In contrast, major SiNx spontaneous etching displayed an etch rate of 1.72 Å/min and predominated over SiNx thermal ALE. The selectivity factor was ∼50:1 for SiNx spontaneous etching compared to SiO2 spontaneous etching using an HF pressure of 3 Torr. This selective SiNx spontaneous etching was attributed to F– surface species during HF exposures. NH3 codosing with HF was then examined during thermal ALE and spontaneous etching. Thermal ALE of SiO2 and SiNx was examined using sequential TMA and HF + NH3 codosing with reactant exposures of 3 Torr for 45 s at 275 °C. SiO2 thermal ALE with HF + NH3 codosing had a high EPC of 8.83 Å/cycle. In contrast, SiNx thermal ALE with HF + NH3 codosing was negligible. The selectivity factor was reversed and much higher at >1000:1 for SiO2 etching compared to SiNx etching (preferential SiO2 removal) during thermal ALE with HF + NH3 codosing. Rapid SiO2 spontaneous etching with HF + NH3 codosing at 3 Torr had an etch rate of 27.50 Å/min. In contrast, SiNx spontaneous etching with HF + NH3 codosing produced a very low etch rate of 0.02 Å/min. The selectivity factor was >1000:1 for SiO2 spontaneous etching compared to SiNx spontaneous etching with HF + NH3 codosing. This selective SiO2 spontaneous etching was attributed to HF2– surface species during HF + NH3 exposures. These studies revealed that the NH3 coadsorbate during HF exposures modified the active etch species and dramatically influenced the etch selectivity between SiO2 and SiNx. Reciprocal etch selectivity should be important for the selective removal of SiO2 or SiNx in composite structures.
期刊介绍:
The journal Chemistry of Materials focuses on publishing original research at the intersection of materials science and chemistry. The studies published in the journal involve chemistry as a prominent component and explore topics such as the design, synthesis, characterization, processing, understanding, and application of functional or potentially functional materials. The journal covers various areas of interest, including inorganic and organic solid-state chemistry, nanomaterials, biomaterials, thin films and polymers, and composite/hybrid materials. The journal particularly seeks papers that highlight the creation or development of innovative materials with novel optical, electrical, magnetic, catalytic, or mechanical properties. It is essential that manuscripts on these topics have a primary focus on the chemistry of materials and represent a significant advancement compared to prior research. Before external reviews are sought, submitted manuscripts undergo a review process by a minimum of two editors to ensure their appropriateness for the journal and the presence of sufficient evidence of a significant advance that will be of broad interest to the materials chemistry community.