{"title":"胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的主要不良心血管事件:随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。","authors":"Alireza Hosseinpour, Aayushi Sood, Jahangir Kamalpour, Ehsan Zandi, SeyedAbbas Pakmehr, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Akshit Sood, Ankit Agrawal, Rahul Gupta","doi":"10.1002/clc.24314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown encouraging results regarding cardiovascular outcomes mainly in patients with diabetes. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in cardiovascular events between patients with and without diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>After finding eligible studies assessing the impact of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular events in patients with and without diabetes using a systematic search, we performed a meta-analysis on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cardiovascular outcomes between patients taking GLP-1 RAs and placebo stratified by the presence or absence of diabetes. Relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were set as the reporting effect size using the random-effects model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 24 RCTs (50 033 with GLP-1 RAs and 44 514 with placebo) were included. Patients on GLP-1 RAs had lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82−0.93), cardiovascular death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82−0.94), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77−0.97), stroke (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80−0.92), and hospitalization for heart failure (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83−0.98). Both subgroups were shown to be effective in terms of MACE and mortality. Nondiabetic patients had decreased risk of hospitalization for heart failure and MI, whereas the diabetic subgroup had marginally nonsignificant efficacy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings of this meta-analysis indicated that patients who are overweight/obese but do not have diabetes have a comparable reduction in the risk of adverse cardiovascular events as those with diabetes. These results need to be confirmed further by large-scale randomized trials in the future.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With and Without Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Hosseinpour, Aayushi Sood, Jahangir Kamalpour, Ehsan Zandi, SeyedAbbas Pakmehr, Hamidreza Hosseinpour, Akshit Sood, Ankit Agrawal, Rahul Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.24314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown encouraging results regarding cardiovascular outcomes mainly in patients with diabetes. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in cardiovascular events between patients with and without diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>After finding eligible studies assessing the impact of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular events in patients with and without diabetes using a systematic search, we performed a meta-analysis on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cardiovascular outcomes between patients taking GLP-1 RAs and placebo stratified by the presence or absence of diabetes. Relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were set as the reporting effect size using the random-effects model.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 24 RCTs (50 033 with GLP-1 RAs and 44 514 with placebo) were included. Patients on GLP-1 RAs had lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82−0.93), cardiovascular death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82−0.94), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77−0.97), stroke (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80−0.92), and hospitalization for heart failure (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83−0.98). Both subgroups were shown to be effective in terms of MACE and mortality. Nondiabetic patients had decreased risk of hospitalization for heart failure and MI, whereas the diabetic subgroup had marginally nonsignificant efficacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings of this meta-analysis indicated that patients who are overweight/obese but do not have diabetes have a comparable reduction in the risk of adverse cardiovascular events as those with diabetes. These results need to be confirmed further by large-scale randomized trials in the future.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)在心血管方面的疗效令人鼓舞,主要针对糖尿病患者。在本研究中,我们比较了 GLP-1 RAs 对糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者心血管事件的疗效:方法:通过系统性检索找到了评估 GLP-1 RAs 对糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者心血管事件影响的合格研究后,我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了荟萃分析,比较了服用 GLP-1 RAs 和安慰剂患者的心血管结果,并按是否患有糖尿病进行了分层。采用随机效应模型将相对风险(RR)及其 95% 置信区间(CI)设定为报告效应大小:共纳入了 24 项 RCT(50 033 例使用 GLP-1 RAs,44 514 例使用安慰剂)。服用GLP-1 RAs的患者发生主要心血管不良事件(MACE)(RR 0.87,95% CI 0.82-0.93)、心血管死亡(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.82-0.94)、心肌梗死(MI)(RR 0.87,95% CI 0.77-0.97)、中风(RR 0.86,95% CI 0.80-0.92)和心力衰竭住院(RR 0.90,95% CI 0.83-0.98)的风险较低。两个亚组在MACE和死亡率方面均显示出疗效。非糖尿病患者因心衰和心肌梗死住院的风险降低,而糖尿病亚组的疗效略微不显著:这项荟萃分析的结果表明,超重/肥胖但未患糖尿病的患者与糖尿病患者相比,可降低不良心血管事件的风险。这些结果还需要今后的大规模随机试验进一步证实。
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With and Without Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials
Introduction
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have shown encouraging results regarding cardiovascular outcomes mainly in patients with diabetes. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in cardiovascular events between patients with and without diabetes.
Methods
After finding eligible studies assessing the impact of GLP-1 RAs on cardiovascular events in patients with and without diabetes using a systematic search, we performed a meta-analysis on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cardiovascular outcomes between patients taking GLP-1 RAs and placebo stratified by the presence or absence of diabetes. Relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were set as the reporting effect size using the random-effects model.
Results
A total of 24 RCTs (50 033 with GLP-1 RAs and 44 514 with placebo) were included. Patients on GLP-1 RAs had lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82−0.93), cardiovascular death (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82−0.94), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77−0.97), stroke (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80−0.92), and hospitalization for heart failure (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83−0.98). Both subgroups were shown to be effective in terms of MACE and mortality. Nondiabetic patients had decreased risk of hospitalization for heart failure and MI, whereas the diabetic subgroup had marginally nonsignificant efficacy.
Conclusion
The findings of this meta-analysis indicated that patients who are overweight/obese but do not have diabetes have a comparable reduction in the risk of adverse cardiovascular events as those with diabetes. These results need to be confirmed further by large-scale randomized trials in the future.