成年患者烧伤后并发症的种族和民族差异比较。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae126
Mecklin V Ragan, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Katherine C Bergus, Samantha J Wala, Kelli N Patterson, Olubukola O Nafiu, Rajan K Thakkar, Dana M Schwartz
{"title":"成年患者烧伤后并发症的种族和民族差异比较。","authors":"Mecklin V Ragan, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Katherine C Bergus, Samantha J Wala, Kelli N Patterson, Olubukola O Nafiu, Rajan K Thakkar, Dana M Schwartz","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn injury contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Despite an increased focus on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare, there remains a critical knowledge gap in our understanding of the effect of these disparities on complications experienced by burn patients. The American Burn Association's National Burn Repository data were reviewed from 2010 to 2018. Information regarding demographics, burn mechanism and severity, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Data analysis was performed using 1:1 propensity score matching and logistic regression modeling. A separate analysis of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients was performed using Chi-squared tests. Among 215,071 patients, racial distribution was 65.16% White, 19.13% Black, 2.18% Asian, 0.74% American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 12.78% other. Flame injuries were the most common cause (35.2%), followed by scald burns (23.3%). All comparisons were made in reference to the White population. Black patients were more likely to die (OR: 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40), experience all (OR: 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), cardiovascular (OR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43), or infectious (OR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.91) complications, and less likely to experience airway complications (OR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). American Indian/Alaskan Native patients were more likely to experience any complication (OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.70). All minority groups had increased length of hospital stay. Black, Asian, and other patients had longer length of ICU stay. Black patients had longer ventilator duration. Among 82 775 patients, 24 075 patients were identified as Hispanic and 58 700 as non-Hispanic. Statistically significant differences were noted between groups in age, total body surface area, proportion of 2nd-degree burn, and proportion of 3rd-degree burn (P < .01). These findings highlight the need for further work to determine the etiology of these disparities to improve burn care for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"38-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Complications Following Burn Injury in Adult Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mecklin V Ragan, Sibelle Aurelie Yemele Kitio, Katherine C Bergus, Samantha J Wala, Kelli N Patterson, Olubukola O Nafiu, Rajan K Thakkar, Dana M Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/irae126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burn injury contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Despite an increased focus on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare, there remains a critical knowledge gap in our understanding of the effect of these disparities on complications experienced by burn patients. The American Burn Association's National Burn Repository data were reviewed from 2010 to 2018. Information regarding demographics, burn mechanism and severity, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Data analysis was performed using 1:1 propensity score matching and logistic regression modeling. A separate analysis of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients was performed using Chi-squared tests. Among 215,071 patients, racial distribution was 65.16% White, 19.13% Black, 2.18% Asian, 0.74% American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 12.78% other. Flame injuries were the most common cause (35.2%), followed by scald burns (23.3%). All comparisons were made in reference to the White population. Black patients were more likely to die (OR: 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40), experience all (OR: 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), cardiovascular (OR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43), or infectious (OR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.91) complications, and less likely to experience airway complications (OR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). American Indian/Alaskan Native patients were more likely to experience any complication (OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.70). All minority groups had increased length of hospital stay. Black, Asian, and other patients had longer length of ICU stay. Black patients had longer ventilator duration. Among 82 775 patients, 24 075 patients were identified as Hispanic and 58 700 as non-Hispanic. Statistically significant differences were noted between groups in age, total body surface area, proportion of 2nd-degree burn, and proportion of 3rd-degree burn (P < .01). These findings highlight the need for further work to determine the etiology of these disparities to improve burn care for all patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"38-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae126\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国,烧伤造成了严重的发病率和死亡率。尽管人们越来越关注医疗保健中的种族和民族差异,但在了解这些差异对烧伤患者并发症的影响方面仍存在严重的知识差距。我们查阅了美国烧伤协会国家烧伤资料库 2010-2018 年的数据。记录了有关人口统计学、烧伤机制和严重程度、并发症和临床结果的信息。数据分析采用 1:1 倾向分数匹配和逻辑回归模型。使用卡方检验对西班牙裔和非西班牙裔患者分别进行了分析。在 215,071 名患者中,白人占 65.16%,黑人占 19.13%,亚裔占 2.18%,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民占 0.74%,其他种族占 12.78%。火焰伤害是最常见的原因(35.2%),其次是烫伤(23.3%)。所有比较均以白人为参照。黑人患者更有可能死亡(OR:1.28;95%CI:1.17-1.40)、出现所有并发症(OR:1.08;95%CI:1.03-1.14)、心血管并发症(OR:1.24;95%CI:1.08-1.43)或感染性并发症(OR:1.64;95%CI:1.40-1.91),而出现气道并发症的可能性较小(OR:0.83;95%CI:0.74-0.94)。美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民患者更有可能出现任何并发症(OR:1.33;95%CI:1.05-1.70)。所有少数族裔群体的住院时间都有所增加。黑人、亚裔和其他患者的重症监护室住院时间更长。黑人患者使用呼吸机的时间更长。在 82,775 名患者中,有 24,075 名患者被认定为西班牙裔,58,700 名患者被认定为非西班牙裔。在年龄、TBSA、二度烧伤比例和三度烧伤比例方面,各组之间存在明显的统计学差异(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Complications Following Burn Injury in Adult Patients.

Burn injury contributes to significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Despite an increased focus on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare, there remains a critical knowledge gap in our understanding of the effect of these disparities on complications experienced by burn patients. The American Burn Association's National Burn Repository data were reviewed from 2010 to 2018. Information regarding demographics, burn mechanism and severity, complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Data analysis was performed using 1:1 propensity score matching and logistic regression modeling. A separate analysis of Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients was performed using Chi-squared tests. Among 215,071 patients, racial distribution was 65.16% White, 19.13% Black, 2.18% Asian, 0.74% American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 12.78% other. Flame injuries were the most common cause (35.2%), followed by scald burns (23.3%). All comparisons were made in reference to the White population. Black patients were more likely to die (OR: 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.40), experience all (OR: 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14), cardiovascular (OR: 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.43), or infectious (OR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.40-1.91) complications, and less likely to experience airway complications (OR: 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94). American Indian/Alaskan Native patients were more likely to experience any complication (OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.05-1.70). All minority groups had increased length of hospital stay. Black, Asian, and other patients had longer length of ICU stay. Black patients had longer ventilator duration. Among 82 775 patients, 24 075 patients were identified as Hispanic and 58 700 as non-Hispanic. Statistically significant differences were noted between groups in age, total body surface area, proportion of 2nd-degree burn, and proportion of 3rd-degree burn (P < .01). These findings highlight the need for further work to determine the etiology of these disparities to improve burn care for all patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Burn center versus burn unit, which is better? Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and its Use in Burn Wounds: An Updated Systematic Review. Burn Progression in Human Skin - A Review of Current Knowledge and Opportunities for Future Research. Unplanned Extubation in the Burn Unit: A Retrospective Review. Wildland Firefighters Suffer Increasing Risk of Job-Related Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1