中低收入国家心理保健服务中的参与式研究:范围界定审查协议。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00491
Naveen Krishnan, Poornima Sunder, Nithin Lalachan, Monisha Mohan, Chitra Venkateswaran, Denny John
{"title":"中低收入国家心理保健服务中的参与式研究:范围界定审查协议。","authors":"Naveen Krishnan, Poornima Sunder, Nithin Lalachan, Monisha Mohan, Chitra Venkateswaran, Denny John","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review will be to identify and map the characteristics of participatory research approaches in mental health care services conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Developing countries have a treatment gap of 76% to 85% for mental disorders. Participatory research can help understand community perspectives, which, in turn, helps develop sustainable, contextually specific services. Although participatory research appears promising, especially in the context of LMICs, the field is heterogenous in terms of the methods used; the various stakeholders; the design, implementation, and evaluation of services; and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include all studies on participatory research in mental health care services in LMICs. All types of participants (ie, children/adolescent/adults, gender, rural/urban, etc.) and settings will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished studies will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Google Scholar (first 10 pages). We will also search for gray literature and screen reference lists of relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts of the studies, followed by full-text screening. Data will be extracted using a predefined form. The findings will be descriptively presented with supporting tables and diagrams, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Details of the review can be found in Open Science Framework https://osf.io/cn54r.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory research in mental health care services in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Naveen Krishnan, Poornima Sunder, Nithin Lalachan, Monisha Mohan, Chitra Venkateswaran, Denny John\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-23-00491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this scoping review will be to identify and map the characteristics of participatory research approaches in mental health care services conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Developing countries have a treatment gap of 76% to 85% for mental disorders. Participatory research can help understand community perspectives, which, in turn, helps develop sustainable, contextually specific services. Although participatory research appears promising, especially in the context of LMICs, the field is heterogenous in terms of the methods used; the various stakeholders; the design, implementation, and evaluation of services; and outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include all studies on participatory research in mental health care services in LMICs. All types of participants (ie, children/adolescent/adults, gender, rural/urban, etc.) and settings will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The proposed review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished studies will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Google Scholar (first 10 pages). We will also search for gray literature and screen reference lists of relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts of the studies, followed by full-text screening. Data will be extracted using a predefined form. The findings will be descriptively presented with supporting tables and diagrams, accompanied by a narrative summary.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Details of the review can be found in Open Science Framework https://osf.io/cn54r.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标本范围综述的目的是确定和描绘在中低收入国家(LMICs)开展的精神卫生保健服务参与式研究方法的特点:发展中国家的精神障碍治疗缺口高达 76% 至 85%。参与式研究有助于了解社区的观点,进而帮助开发可持续的、针对具体情况的服务。尽管参与式研究似乎大有可为,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家的背景下,但该领域在所用方法、各利益相关方、服务的设计、实施和评估以及结果测量等方面存在差异:本综述将包括所有关于低收入与中等收入国家心理保健服务中参与式研究的研究。将考虑所有类型的参与者(即儿童/青少年/成人、性别、农村/城市等)和环境:方法:建议的综述将遵循 JBI 的范围综述方法。将在 MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase (Ovid)、PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost) 和 Google Scholar(前 10 页)中搜索已发表和未发表的研究。我们还将搜索灰色文献并筛选相关综述的参考文献列表。两名独立审稿人将筛选研究报告的标题和摘要,然后进行全文筛选。我们将使用预定义的表格提取数据。研究结果将以描述性的方式呈现,并配有辅助表格和图表,以及叙述性摘要:有关综述的详细信息,请参阅开放科学框架 https://osf.io/cn54r。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participatory research in mental health care services in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol.

Objective: The objective of this scoping review will be to identify and map the characteristics of participatory research approaches in mental health care services conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Introduction: Developing countries have a treatment gap of 76% to 85% for mental disorders. Participatory research can help understand community perspectives, which, in turn, helps develop sustainable, contextually specific services. Although participatory research appears promising, especially in the context of LMICs, the field is heterogenous in terms of the methods used; the various stakeholders; the design, implementation, and evaluation of services; and outcome measures.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include all studies on participatory research in mental health care services in LMICs. All types of participants (ie, children/adolescent/adults, gender, rural/urban, etc.) and settings will be considered.

Methods: The proposed review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Published and unpublished studies will be searched for in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Google Scholar (first 10 pages). We will also search for gray literature and screen reference lists of relevant reviews. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts of the studies, followed by full-text screening. Data will be extracted using a predefined form. The findings will be descriptively presented with supporting tables and diagrams, accompanied by a narrative summary.

Review registration: Details of the review can be found in Open Science Framework https://osf.io/cn54r.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1