住院内科病人常规化验单的再利用(RePORT):一项多中心阶梯式分组随机试验的方案,旨在评估多成分干预包对减少化验单过度使用的影响。

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Implementation Science Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6
Anshula Ambasta, Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc, Surakshya Pokharel, Pamela Mathura, Andrew Wei-Yeh Shih, Henry T Stelfox, Irene Ma, Mark Harrison, Braden Manns, Peter Faris, Tyler Williamson, Caley Shukalek, Maria Santana, Onyebuchi Omodon, Deirdre McCaughey, Narmin Kassam, Chris Naugler
{"title":"住院内科病人常规化验单的再利用(RePORT):一项多中心阶梯式分组随机试验的方案,旨在评估多成分干预包对减少化验单过度使用的影响。","authors":"Anshula Ambasta, Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc, Surakshya Pokharel, Pamela Mathura, Andrew Wei-Yeh Shih, Henry T Stelfox, Irene Ma, Mark Harrison, Braden Manns, Peter Faris, Tyler Williamson, Caley Shukalek, Maria Santana, Onyebuchi Omodon, Deirdre McCaughey, Narmin Kassam, Chris Naugler","doi":"10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory test overuse in hospitals is a form of healthcare waste that also harms patients. Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce this form of healthcare waste is critical. We detail the protocol for our study which aims to implement and evaluate the impact of an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention bundle on repetitive use of routine laboratory testing in hospitalized medical patients across adult hospitals in the province of British Columbia, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have designed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle across 16 hospitals in the province of British Columbia in Canada. We will use the Knowledge to Action cycle to guide implementation and the RE-AIM framework to guide evaluation of the intervention bundle. The primary outcome will be the number of routine laboratory tests ordered per patient-day in the intervention versus control periods. Secondary outcome measures will assess implementation fidelity, number of all common laboratory tests used, impact on healthcare costs, and safety outcomes. The study will include patients admitted to adult medical wards (internal medicine or family medicine) and healthcare providers working in these wards within the participating hospitals. After a baseline period of 24 weeks, we will conduct a 16-week pilot at one hospital site. A new cluster (containing approximately 2-3 hospitals) will receive the intervention every 12 weeks. We will evaluate the sustainability of implementation at 24 weeks post implementation of the final cluster. Using intention to treat, we will use generalized linear mixed models for analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study builds upon a multicomponent intervention bundle that has previously demonstrated effectiveness. The elements of the intervention bundle are easily adaptable to other settings, facilitating future adoption in wider contexts. The study outputs are expected to have a positive impact as they will reduce usage of repetitive laboratory tests and provide empirically supported measures and tools for accomplishing this work.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was prospectively registered on April 8, 2024, via ClinicalTrials.gov Protocols Registration and Results System (NCT06359587). https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1.</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Purposing the Ordering of Routine Laboratory Tests in Hospitalized Medical Patients (RePORT): protocol for a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle to reduce laboratory test over-utilization.\",\"authors\":\"Anshula Ambasta, Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc, Surakshya Pokharel, Pamela Mathura, Andrew Wei-Yeh Shih, Henry T Stelfox, Irene Ma, Mark Harrison, Braden Manns, Peter Faris, Tyler Williamson, Caley Shukalek, Maria Santana, Onyebuchi Omodon, Deirdre McCaughey, Narmin Kassam, Chris Naugler\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laboratory test overuse in hospitals is a form of healthcare waste that also harms patients. Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce this form of healthcare waste is critical. We detail the protocol for our study which aims to implement and evaluate the impact of an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention bundle on repetitive use of routine laboratory testing in hospitalized medical patients across adult hospitals in the province of British Columbia, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have designed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle across 16 hospitals in the province of British Columbia in Canada. We will use the Knowledge to Action cycle to guide implementation and the RE-AIM framework to guide evaluation of the intervention bundle. The primary outcome will be the number of routine laboratory tests ordered per patient-day in the intervention versus control periods. Secondary outcome measures will assess implementation fidelity, number of all common laboratory tests used, impact on healthcare costs, and safety outcomes. The study will include patients admitted to adult medical wards (internal medicine or family medicine) and healthcare providers working in these wards within the participating hospitals. After a baseline period of 24 weeks, we will conduct a 16-week pilot at one hospital site. A new cluster (containing approximately 2-3 hospitals) will receive the intervention every 12 weeks. We will evaluate the sustainability of implementation at 24 weeks post implementation of the final cluster. Using intention to treat, we will use generalized linear mixed models for analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study builds upon a multicomponent intervention bundle that has previously demonstrated effectiveness. The elements of the intervention bundle are easily adaptable to other settings, facilitating future adoption in wider contexts. The study outputs are expected to have a positive impact as they will reduce usage of repetitive laboratory tests and provide empirically supported measures and tools for accomplishing this work.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was prospectively registered on April 8, 2024, via ClinicalTrials.gov Protocols Registration and Results System (NCT06359587). https://classic.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation Science\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11221016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01376-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医院过度使用化验单是一种医疗浪费,也会对患者造成伤害。制定和评估减少这种医疗浪费的干预措施至关重要。我们详细介绍了我们的研究方案,其目的是在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的成人医院中,实施并评估基于证据的多成分干预捆绑方案对住院病人重复使用常规实验室检查的影响:我们设计了一项阶梯式分组随机试验,以评估加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省 16 家医院实施多成分干预捆绑计划的影响。我们将采用 "从知识到行动 "循环来指导实施,并采用 RE-AIM 框架来指导干预捆绑计划的评估。主要结果是干预期与对照期每个患者日常规化验单的数量。次要结果指标将评估实施的忠实度、所有常用化验项目的数量、对医疗成本的影响以及安全结果。研究对象包括参与医院成人内科病房(内科或家庭医学科)的住院患者以及在这些病房工作的医护人员。在 24 周的基线期后,我们将在一家医院进行为期 16 周的试点。每 12 周将有一个新的群组(大约包含 2-3 家医院)接受干预。我们将在最后一个群组实施 24 周后对实施的可持续性进行评估。通过意向治疗,我们将使用广义线性混合模型进行分析,以评估干预对结果的影响:本研究以先前已证明有效的多成分干预包为基础。该干预包的要素很容易适应其他环境,便于将来在更广泛的环境中采用。预计研究成果将产生积极影响,因为它们将减少重复实验室检测的使用,并为完成这项工作提供经验支持的措施和工具:本研究于2024年4月8日通过ClinicalTrials.gov协议注册和结果系统(NCT06359587)进行了前瞻性注册。https://classic.Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Re-Purposing the Ordering of Routine Laboratory Tests in Hospitalized Medical Patients (RePORT): protocol for a multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to evaluate the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle to reduce laboratory test over-utilization.

Background: Laboratory test overuse in hospitals is a form of healthcare waste that also harms patients. Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce this form of healthcare waste is critical. We detail the protocol for our study which aims to implement and evaluate the impact of an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention bundle on repetitive use of routine laboratory testing in hospitalized medical patients across adult hospitals in the province of British Columbia, Canada.

Methods: We have designed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle across 16 hospitals in the province of British Columbia in Canada. We will use the Knowledge to Action cycle to guide implementation and the RE-AIM framework to guide evaluation of the intervention bundle. The primary outcome will be the number of routine laboratory tests ordered per patient-day in the intervention versus control periods. Secondary outcome measures will assess implementation fidelity, number of all common laboratory tests used, impact on healthcare costs, and safety outcomes. The study will include patients admitted to adult medical wards (internal medicine or family medicine) and healthcare providers working in these wards within the participating hospitals. After a baseline period of 24 weeks, we will conduct a 16-week pilot at one hospital site. A new cluster (containing approximately 2-3 hospitals) will receive the intervention every 12 weeks. We will evaluate the sustainability of implementation at 24 weeks post implementation of the final cluster. Using intention to treat, we will use generalized linear mixed models for analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes.

Discussion: The study builds upon a multicomponent intervention bundle that has previously demonstrated effectiveness. The elements of the intervention bundle are easily adaptable to other settings, facilitating future adoption in wider contexts. The study outputs are expected to have a positive impact as they will reduce usage of repetitive laboratory tests and provide empirically supported measures and tools for accomplishing this work.

Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered on April 8, 2024, via ClinicalTrials.gov Protocols Registration and Results System (NCT06359587). https://classic.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
期刊最新文献
Training and education provided to local change champions within implementation trials: a rapid systematic review. Assessing the comparative effectiveness of ECHO and coaching implementation strategies in a jail/provider MOUD implementation trial. Looking under the hood of a hybrid two-way texting intervention to improve early retention on antiretroviral therapy in Malawi: an implementation fidelity evaluation. Improving the adoption of a school-based nutrition program: findings from a collaborative network of randomised trials. Finding the right dose: a scoping review examining facilitation as an implementation strategy for evidence-based stroke care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1