Review of Machine Learning Techniques in Soft Tissue Biomechanics and Biomaterials.

Background and objective: Advanced material models and material characterization of soft biological tissues play an essential role in pre-surgical planning for vascular surgeries and transcatheter interventions. Recent advances in heart valve engineering, medical device and patch design are built upon these models. Furthermore, understanding vascular growth and remodeling in native and tissue-engineered vascular biomaterials, as well as designing and testing drugs on soft tissue, are crucial aspects of predictive regenerative medicine. Traditional nonlinear optimization methods and finite element (FE) simulations have served as biomaterial characterization tools combined with soft tissue mechanics and tensile testing for decades. However, results obtained through nonlinear optimization methods are reliable only to a certain extent due to mathematical limitations, and FE simulations may require substantial computing time and resources, which might not be justified for patient-specific simulations. To a significant extent, machine learning (ML) techniques have gained increasing prominence in the field of soft tissue mechanics in recent years, offering notable advantages over conventional methods. This review article presents an in-depth examination of emerging ML algorithms utilized for estimating the mechanical characteristics of soft biological tissues and biomaterials. These algorithms are employed to analyze crucial properties such as stress-strain curves and pressure-volume loops. The focus of the review is on applications in cardiovascular engineering, and the fundamental mathematical basis of each approach is also discussed.

Methods: The review effort employed two strategies. First, the recent studies of major research groups actively engaged in cardiovascular soft tissue mechanics are compiled, and research papers utilizing ML and deep learning (DL) techniques were included in our review. The second strategy involved a standard keyword search across major databases. This approach provided 11 relevant ML articles, meticulously selected from reputable sources including ScienceDirect, Springer, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The selection process involved using specific keywords such as "machine learning" or "deep learning" in conjunction with "soft biological tissues", "cardiovascular", "patient-specific," "strain energy", "vascular" or "biomaterials". Initially, a total of 25 articles were selected. However, 14 of these articles were excluded as they did not align with the criteria of focusing on biomaterials specifically employed for soft tissue repair and regeneration. As a result, the remaining 11 articles were categorized based on the ML techniques employed and the training data utilized.

Results: ML techniques utilized for assessing the mechanical characteristics of soft biological tissues and biomaterials are broadly classified into two categories: standard ML algorithms and physics-informed ML algorithms. The standard ML models are then organized based on their tasks, being grouped into Regression and Classification subcategories. Within these categories, studies employ various supervised learning models, including support vector machines (SVMs), bagged decision trees (BDTs), artificial neural networks (ANNs) or deep neural networks (DNNs), and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Additionally, the utilization of unsupervised learning approaches, such as autoencoders incorporating principal component analysis (PCA) and/or low-rank approximation (LRA), is based on the specific characteristics of the training data. The training data predominantly consists of three types: experimental mechanical data, including uniaxial or biaxial stress-strain data; synthetic mechanical data generated through non-linear fitting and/or FE simulations; and image data such as 3D second harmonic generation (SHG) images or computed tomography (CT) images. The evaluation of performance for physics-informed ML models primarily relies on the coefficient of determination $R^2$ . In contrast, various metrics and error measures are utilized to assess the performance of standard ML models. Furthermore, our review includes an extensive examination of prevalent biomaterial models that can serve as physical laws for physics-informed ML models.

Conclusion: ML models offer an accurate, fast, and reliable approach for evaluating the mechanical characteristics of diseased soft tissue segments and selecting optimal biomaterials for time-critical soft tissue surgeries. Among the various ML models examined in this review, physics-informed neural network models exhibit the capability to forecast the mechanical response of soft biological tissues accurately, even with limited training samples. These models achieve high $R^2$ values ranging from 0.90 to 1.00. This is particularly significant considering the challenges associated with obtaining a large number of living tissue samples for experimental purposes, which can be time-consuming and impractical. Additionally, the review not only discusses the advantages identified in the current literature but also sheds light on the limitations and offers insights into future perspectives.