肿瘤坏死因子-α受体阻滞剂疗法对常规治疗失败的轴性脊柱关节炎患者的疗效:一项以 ASAS 健康指数改善情况为重点的比较研究。

IF 2.2 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Journal of Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.4078/jrd.2024.0029
Ah-Ra Choi, Ki-Jeong Park, Ji-Hyoun Kang, Yu Jeong Lee, Hyun Hee Jang, Moon-Ju Kim, Tae-Jong Kim
{"title":"肿瘤坏死因子-α受体阻滞剂疗法对常规治疗失败的轴性脊柱关节炎患者的疗效:一项以 ASAS 健康指数改善情况为重点的比较研究。","authors":"Ah-Ra Choi, Ki-Jeong Park, Ji-Hyoun Kang, Yu Jeong Lee, Hyun Hee Jang, Moon-Ju Kim, Tae-Jong Kim","doi":"10.4078/jrd.2024.0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blocker therapy on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS-HI) among patients who have failed conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative study was conducted involving axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated with either TNF-α blocker or conventional therapy. Patient data, including demographics, disease characteristics, and ASAS-HI scores, were collected before and after treatment. Statistical analysis was performed to compare changes in ASAS-HI scores between the TNF-α blocker and the conventional therapy group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of patients with axSpA, with a mean age of 38.3 years in conventional treatment group and 29.3 years in TNF-α blocker group. Most variables, including C-reactive protein levels, other comorbidities, and disease assessment scores showed no significant difference between groups. Longitudinal analysis within each treatment group from Week 0 to 12 showed no significant change in the conventional treatment group, whereas the TNF-α blocker group experienced a significant reduction in ASAS-HI scores, demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment. The TNF-α blocker group exhibited a significantly greater improvement in ASAS-HI scores compared to the conventional therapy group. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index demonstrated strong positive correlations with ASAS-HI scores, indicating higher disease activity and functional limitation are associated with worse health outcomes in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research demonstrates that ASAS-HI scores significantly improve with TNF-α blocker therapy in axSpA patients, underscoring ASAS-HI's effectiveness as a tool for evaluating drug responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":56161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"31 3","pages":"171-177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11215249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-α blocker therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who failed conventional treatment: a comparative study focused on improvement in ASAS Health Index.\",\"authors\":\"Ah-Ra Choi, Ki-Jeong Park, Ji-Hyoun Kang, Yu Jeong Lee, Hyun Hee Jang, Moon-Ju Kim, Tae-Jong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4078/jrd.2024.0029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blocker therapy on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS-HI) among patients who have failed conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative study was conducted involving axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated with either TNF-α blocker or conventional therapy. Patient data, including demographics, disease characteristics, and ASAS-HI scores, were collected before and after treatment. Statistical analysis was performed to compare changes in ASAS-HI scores between the TNF-α blocker and the conventional therapy group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted of patients with axSpA, with a mean age of 38.3 years in conventional treatment group and 29.3 years in TNF-α blocker group. Most variables, including C-reactive protein levels, other comorbidities, and disease assessment scores showed no significant difference between groups. Longitudinal analysis within each treatment group from Week 0 to 12 showed no significant change in the conventional treatment group, whereas the TNF-α blocker group experienced a significant reduction in ASAS-HI scores, demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment. The TNF-α blocker group exhibited a significantly greater improvement in ASAS-HI scores compared to the conventional therapy group. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index demonstrated strong positive correlations with ASAS-HI scores, indicating higher disease activity and functional limitation are associated with worse health outcomes in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research demonstrates that ASAS-HI scores significantly improve with TNF-α blocker therapy in axSpA patients, underscoring ASAS-HI's effectiveness as a tool for evaluating drug responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"171-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11215249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2024.0029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2024.0029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α受体阻滞剂疗法对常规非甾体抗炎药物治疗失败的患者脊柱关节炎国际社会健康指数评估(ASAS-HI)的影响:方法:对接受 TNF-α 阻断剂或传统疗法治疗的轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者进行了一项比较研究。研究收集了治疗前后的患者数据,包括人口统计学、疾病特征和 ASAS-HI 评分。对TNF-α受体阻滞剂组和常规疗法组的ASAS-HI评分变化进行了统计分析比较:研究对象包括axSpA患者,常规治疗组的平均年龄为38.3岁,TNF-α受体阻滞剂组的平均年龄为29.3岁。包括C反应蛋白水平、其他合并症和疾病评估评分在内的大多数变量在各组间无显著差异。对各治疗组从第0周到第12周的纵向分析显示,常规治疗组无明显变化,而TNF-α受体阻滞剂组的ASAS-HI评分显著降低,证明了治疗的有效性。与常规治疗组相比,TNF-α受体阻滞剂组的ASAS-HI评分改善幅度更大。巴斯强直性脊柱炎功能指数(Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index)和巴斯强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index)与ASAS-HI评分呈强正相关,表明疾病活动和功能受限程度越高,患者的健康状况越差:研究表明,ASAS-HI评分在axSpA患者接受TNF-α阻断剂治疗后会明显改善,这突出了ASAS-HI作为药物反应评估工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor-α blocker therapy in patients with axial spondyloarthritis who failed conventional treatment: a comparative study focused on improvement in ASAS Health Index.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blocker therapy on the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS-HI) among patients who have failed conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Methods: A comparative study was conducted involving axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated with either TNF-α blocker or conventional therapy. Patient data, including demographics, disease characteristics, and ASAS-HI scores, were collected before and after treatment. Statistical analysis was performed to compare changes in ASAS-HI scores between the TNF-α blocker and the conventional therapy group.

Results: The study population consisted of patients with axSpA, with a mean age of 38.3 years in conventional treatment group and 29.3 years in TNF-α blocker group. Most variables, including C-reactive protein levels, other comorbidities, and disease assessment scores showed no significant difference between groups. Longitudinal analysis within each treatment group from Week 0 to 12 showed no significant change in the conventional treatment group, whereas the TNF-α blocker group experienced a significant reduction in ASAS-HI scores, demonstrating the effectiveness of the treatment. The TNF-α blocker group exhibited a significantly greater improvement in ASAS-HI scores compared to the conventional therapy group. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index demonstrated strong positive correlations with ASAS-HI scores, indicating higher disease activity and functional limitation are associated with worse health outcomes in patients.

Conclusion: The research demonstrates that ASAS-HI scores significantly improve with TNF-α blocker therapy in axSpA patients, underscoring ASAS-HI's effectiveness as a tool for evaluating drug responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Assessment of disease activity and quality of life of Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis. An erythrocyte macrocytosis by methotrexate is associated with early initiation of biologic or targeted synthetic agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Associations between circulating interleukin-18 levels and adult-onset Still's disease: a meta-analysis. Efficacy of Curcuma longa in relieving pain symptoms of knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Impact of disease-related indicators on pain measures in rheumatoid arthritis: a biopsychosocial perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1