{"title":"不同粘合树脂和复合贴面材料对聚醚醚酮粘合力的影响","authors":"Sezgi Cinel Sahin, Lamia Mutlu-Sagesen, Isil Karaokutan, Mutlu Ozcan","doi":"10.3290/j.cjdr.b5459601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different adhesives and veneering resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 138 PEEK specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups according to adhesive material application: Control (C, no application), Adhese Universal (A) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Gluma Bond Universal (G) (Heraeus Kulzer, South Bend, IN, USA), G-PremioBOND (P) (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Single Bond Universal (S) (3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and visio.link (V) (Bredent, Senden, Germany). Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of veneering material: Estenia direct composite (D) and Gradia Plus indirect composite (IN) (both GC Corporation). After the veneering process, the specimens were aged by thermal cycling. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for SBS analysis (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest SBS results were obtained in the VIN group, followed by the VD, PD, GIN, AIN, AD, SIN, SD, PIN, GD, CIN and CD groups, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the type of veneering composite when the same adhesive was applied (P > 0.05), except for Gluma Bond Universal (P = 0.009). All the adhesives tested showed clinically acceptable SBS results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visio.link offered the highest adhesion to PEEK, whereas the tested universal adhesives may be used as an alternative to visio.link in clinical settings. It was determined that changing the veneer type has no statistical difference when the same adhesive material is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":74983,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","volume":"27 2","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Adhesive Resin and Composite Veneering Materials on Adhesion to Polyetheretherketone.\",\"authors\":\"Sezgi Cinel Sahin, Lamia Mutlu-Sagesen, Isil Karaokutan, Mutlu Ozcan\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.cjdr.b5459601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different adhesives and veneering resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 138 PEEK specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups according to adhesive material application: Control (C, no application), Adhese Universal (A) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Gluma Bond Universal (G) (Heraeus Kulzer, South Bend, IN, USA), G-PremioBOND (P) (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Single Bond Universal (S) (3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and visio.link (V) (Bredent, Senden, Germany). Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of veneering material: Estenia direct composite (D) and Gradia Plus indirect composite (IN) (both GC Corporation). After the veneering process, the specimens were aged by thermal cycling. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for SBS analysis (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest SBS results were obtained in the VIN group, followed by the VD, PD, GIN, AIN, AD, SIN, SD, PIN, GD, CIN and CD groups, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the type of veneering composite when the same adhesive was applied (P > 0.05), except for Gluma Bond Universal (P = 0.009). All the adhesives tested showed clinically acceptable SBS results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Visio.link offered the highest adhesion to PEEK, whereas the tested universal adhesives may be used as an alternative to visio.link in clinical settings. It was determined that changing the veneer type has no statistical difference when the same adhesive material is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"161-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b5459601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b5459601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评估不同粘合剂和贴面树脂对聚醚醚酮(PEEK)剪切粘接强度(SBS)的影响:共 138 个 PEEK 试样,根据粘合剂材料的应用随机分为 6 组:对照组(C,无应用)、Adhese Universal 组(A)(Ivoclar Vivadent,Schaan,列支敦士登)、Gluma Bond Universal 组(G)(Heraeus Kulzer,South Bend,IN,USA)、G-PremioBOND 组(P)(GC Corporation,Tokyo,Japan)、Single Bond Universal 组(S)(3M,Saint Paul,MN,USA)和 visio.link 组(V)(Bredent,Senden,Germany)。每组粘合剂根据贴面材料的类型分为两个亚组:Estenia 直接复合材料(D)和 Gradia Plus 间接复合材料(IN)(均为 GC 公司产品)。贴面工艺完成后,对试样进行热循环老化。SBS 分析采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验(P < 0.05):VIN 组的 SBS 结果最高,其次分别是 VD、PD、GIN、AIN、AD、SIN、SD、PIN、GD、CIN 和 CD 组(P = 0.001)。除了 Gluma Bond Universal(P = 0.009)外,在使用相同粘合剂时,贴面复合材料的类型没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。所有测试的粘合剂都显示出临床上可接受的 SBS 结果:结论:Visio.link 与 PEEK 的粘附性最高,而测试的通用粘合剂可在临床环境中用作 visio.link 的替代品。结论:Visio.link 与 PEEK 的粘合力最强,而测试的通用粘合剂可在临床中用作 visio.link 的替代品。
Effect of Different Adhesive Resin and Composite Veneering Materials on Adhesion to Polyetheretherketone.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of different adhesives and veneering resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK).
Methods: A total of 138 PEEK specimens were randomly divided into 6 groups according to adhesive material application: Control (C, no application), Adhese Universal (A) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), Gluma Bond Universal (G) (Heraeus Kulzer, South Bend, IN, USA), G-PremioBOND (P) (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Single Bond Universal (S) (3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA) and visio.link (V) (Bredent, Senden, Germany). Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of veneering material: Estenia direct composite (D) and Gradia Plus indirect composite (IN) (both GC Corporation). After the veneering process, the specimens were aged by thermal cycling. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for SBS analysis (P < 0.05).
Results: The highest SBS results were obtained in the VIN group, followed by the VD, PD, GIN, AIN, AD, SIN, SD, PIN, GD, CIN and CD groups, respectively (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the type of veneering composite when the same adhesive was applied (P > 0.05), except for Gluma Bond Universal (P = 0.009). All the adhesives tested showed clinically acceptable SBS results.
Conclusion: Visio.link offered the highest adhesion to PEEK, whereas the tested universal adhesives may be used as an alternative to visio.link in clinical settings. It was determined that changing the veneer type has no statistical difference when the same adhesive material is used.