{"title":"编辑拒绝的 4 个更多原型原因","authors":"Tina Zhang , Steven W. Cranford","doi":"10.1016/j.matt.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The editorial team at <em>Matter</em> is frequently asked about common reasons for desk rejections that can be potentially avoided. Here, we focus on four common archetype reasons papers are rejected without review, not because they reflect poor science, but because they succumb to common pitfalls that are prevalent across materials science papers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":388,"journal":{"name":"Matter","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":17.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4 MORE archetype reasons for editorial rejection\",\"authors\":\"Tina Zhang , Steven W. Cranford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.matt.2024.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The editorial team at <em>Matter</em> is frequently asked about common reasons for desk rejections that can be potentially avoided. Here, we focus on four common archetype reasons papers are rejected without review, not because they reflect poor science, but because they succumb to common pitfalls that are prevalent across materials science papers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Matter\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Matter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590238524003205\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matter","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590238524003205","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The editorial team at Matter is frequently asked about common reasons for desk rejections that can be potentially avoided. Here, we focus on four common archetype reasons papers are rejected without review, not because they reflect poor science, but because they succumb to common pitfalls that are prevalent across materials science papers.
期刊介绍：
Matter, a monthly journal affiliated with Cell, spans the broad field of materials science from nano to macro levels,covering fundamentals to applications. Embracing groundbreaking technologies,it includes full-length research articles,reviews, perspectives,previews, opinions, personnel stories, and general editorial content.
Matter aims to be the primary resource for researchers in academia and industry, inspiring the next generation of materials scientists.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
