投资者对影响驱动型初创企业的看法--确定性的优先次序

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS Social Enterprise Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1108/sej-02-2024-0028
Christin Eckerle, Ann-Sophie Finner, Orestis Terzidis
{"title":"投资者对影响驱动型初创企业的看法--确定性的优先次序","authors":"Christin Eckerle, Ann-Sophie Finner, Orestis Terzidis","doi":"10.1108/sej-02-2024-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>In this study, the authors dive into the assessment process of startups by impact investors. In particular, the purpose of this study is to investigate the preferences impact investors place on different social and environmental criteria. The authors build on social learning theory to understand the underlying rationale of the investors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>With this research, the authors simplify the impact category system by conducting a systematic literature review. The authors then validate these criteria with a survey of 69 impact investors in Europe.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results highlight the prioritization of quantifying impact and a discrepancy between essential and desirable impact categories. Due to the clear and significant results changing with the target market and startup stage focus, the authors assume a tendency of homophily of impact investors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>With this empirical study, the authors offer strategic implications for investors and startups as the authors decrease the complexity of impact categories while validating their significance in the impact assessment process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor perspective on impact-driven startups – the prioritization of certainty\",\"authors\":\"Christin Eckerle, Ann-Sophie Finner, Orestis Terzidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sej-02-2024-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>In this study, the authors dive into the assessment process of startups by impact investors. In particular, the purpose of this study is to investigate the preferences impact investors place on different social and environmental criteria. The authors build on social learning theory to understand the underlying rationale of the investors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>With this research, the authors simplify the impact category system by conducting a systematic literature review. The authors then validate these criteria with a survey of 69 impact investors in Europe.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results highlight the prioritization of quantifying impact and a discrepancy between essential and desirable impact categories. Due to the clear and significant results changing with the target market and startup stage focus, the authors assume a tendency of homophily of impact investors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>With this empirical study, the authors offer strategic implications for investors and startups as the authors decrease the complexity of impact categories while validating their significance in the impact assessment process.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":46809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-02-2024-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-02-2024-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在本研究中,作者深入研究了社会企业投资者对初创企业的评估过程。特别是,本研究旨在调查社会企业投资者对不同社会和环境标准的偏好。作者以社会学习理论为基础,了解投资者的基本理念。设计/方法/途径在本研究中,作者通过系统的文献综述简化了社会企业类别系统。然后,作者对欧洲的 69 位社会企业投资者进行了调查,验证了这些标准。研究结果研究结果强调了量化社会企业影响的优先顺序,以及基本社会企业影响类别和理想社会企业影响类别之间的差异。原创性/价值通过这项实证研究,作者为投资者和初创企业提供了战略意义,因为作者降低了影响类别的复杂性,同时验证了它们在影响评估过程中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investor perspective on impact-driven startups – the prioritization of certainty

Purpose

In this study, the authors dive into the assessment process of startups by impact investors. In particular, the purpose of this study is to investigate the preferences impact investors place on different social and environmental criteria. The authors build on social learning theory to understand the underlying rationale of the investors.

Design/methodology/approach

With this research, the authors simplify the impact category system by conducting a systematic literature review. The authors then validate these criteria with a survey of 69 impact investors in Europe.

Findings

The results highlight the prioritization of quantifying impact and a discrepancy between essential and desirable impact categories. Due to the clear and significant results changing with the target market and startup stage focus, the authors assume a tendency of homophily of impact investors.

Originality/value

With this empirical study, the authors offer strategic implications for investors and startups as the authors decrease the complexity of impact categories while validating their significance in the impact assessment process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Tensions in work integration social enterprises in The Netherlands: balancing social and commercial goals in a multi-stakeholder context Heart and soul: business model innovation by a work-integration organization Roles of entrepreneurship competence in stimulating young generation to become social entrepreneurs in an emerging country Social entrepreneurship and rural development in post-independence Indonesia The dark side of impact measurement: complexities and drawbacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1