胶质母细胞瘤免疫疗法生物仿生策略的最新进展。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomaterials Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122694
Haoyu You , Shuo Geng , Shangkuo Li , Mohammad Imani , Davide Brambilla , Tao Sun , Chen Jiang
{"title":"胶质母细胞瘤免疫疗法生物仿生策略的最新进展。","authors":"Haoyu You ,&nbsp;Shuo Geng ,&nbsp;Shangkuo Li ,&nbsp;Mohammad Imani ,&nbsp;Davide Brambilla ,&nbsp;Tao Sun ,&nbsp;Chen Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Immunotherapy is regarded as one of the most promising approaches for treating tumors, with a multitude of immunotherapeutic thoughts currently under consideration for the lethal glioblastoma (GBM). However, issues with immunotherapeutic agents, such as limited <em>in vivo</em> stability, poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, insufficient GBM targeting, and represented monotherapy, have hindered the success of immunotherapeutic interventions. Moreover, even with the aid of conventional drug delivery systems, outcomes remain suboptimal. Biomimetic strategies seek to overcome these formidable drug delivery challenges by emulating nature's intelligent structures and functions. Leveraging the variety of biological structures and functions, biomimetic drug delivery systems afford a versatile platform with enhanced biocompatibility for the co-delivery of diverse immunotherapeutic agents. Moreover, their inherent capacity to traverse the BBB and home in on GBM holds promise for augmenting the efficacy of GBM immunotherapy. Thus, this review begins by revisiting the various thoughts and agents on immunotherapy for GBM. Then, the barriers to successful GBM immunotherapy are analyzed, and the corresponding biomimetic strategies are explored from the perspective of function and structure. Finally, the clinical translation's current state and prospects of biomimetic strategy are addressed. This review aspires to provide fresh perspectives on the advancement of immunotherapy for GBM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":254,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent advances in biomimetic strategies for the immunotherapy of glioblastoma\",\"authors\":\"Haoyu You ,&nbsp;Shuo Geng ,&nbsp;Shangkuo Li ,&nbsp;Mohammad Imani ,&nbsp;Davide Brambilla ,&nbsp;Tao Sun ,&nbsp;Chen Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Immunotherapy is regarded as one of the most promising approaches for treating tumors, with a multitude of immunotherapeutic thoughts currently under consideration for the lethal glioblastoma (GBM). However, issues with immunotherapeutic agents, such as limited <em>in vivo</em> stability, poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, insufficient GBM targeting, and represented monotherapy, have hindered the success of immunotherapeutic interventions. Moreover, even with the aid of conventional drug delivery systems, outcomes remain suboptimal. Biomimetic strategies seek to overcome these formidable drug delivery challenges by emulating nature's intelligent structures and functions. Leveraging the variety of biological structures and functions, biomimetic drug delivery systems afford a versatile platform with enhanced biocompatibility for the co-delivery of diverse immunotherapeutic agents. Moreover, their inherent capacity to traverse the BBB and home in on GBM holds promise for augmenting the efficacy of GBM immunotherapy. Thus, this review begins by revisiting the various thoughts and agents on immunotherapy for GBM. Then, the barriers to successful GBM immunotherapy are analyzed, and the corresponding biomimetic strategies are explored from the perspective of function and structure. Finally, the clinical translation's current state and prospects of biomimetic strategy are addressed. This review aspires to provide fresh perspectives on the advancement of immunotherapy for GBM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014296122400228X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014296122400228X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫疗法被认为是治疗肿瘤最有前途的方法之一,目前有多种免疫疗法正在考虑用于治疗致命的胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)。然而,免疫治疗药物存在的问题,如体内稳定性有限、血脑屏障(BBB)穿透性差、GBM靶向性不足以及以单一疗法为代表等,阻碍了免疫治疗干预的成功。此外,即使在传统给药系统的帮助下,疗效仍不理想。生物仿生策略试图通过模仿自然界的智能结构和功能来克服这些严峻的给药挑战。利用各种生物结构和功能,生物仿生给药系统提供了一个多功能平台,具有更强的生物相容性,可联合给药多种免疫治疗药物。此外,生物仿生给药系统固有的穿越 BBB 并锁定 GBM 的能力为提高 GBM 免疫疗法的疗效带来了希望。因此,本综述首先回顾了有关 GBM 免疫疗法的各种想法和药物。然后,分析 GBM 免疫疗法成功的障碍,并从功能和结构的角度探讨相应的生物仿生策略。最后,探讨了生物仿生策略的临床转化现状和前景。这篇综述希望为 GBM 免疫疗法的发展提供新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent advances in biomimetic strategies for the immunotherapy of glioblastoma

Immunotherapy is regarded as one of the most promising approaches for treating tumors, with a multitude of immunotherapeutic thoughts currently under consideration for the lethal glioblastoma (GBM). However, issues with immunotherapeutic agents, such as limited in vivo stability, poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, insufficient GBM targeting, and represented monotherapy, have hindered the success of immunotherapeutic interventions. Moreover, even with the aid of conventional drug delivery systems, outcomes remain suboptimal. Biomimetic strategies seek to overcome these formidable drug delivery challenges by emulating nature's intelligent structures and functions. Leveraging the variety of biological structures and functions, biomimetic drug delivery systems afford a versatile platform with enhanced biocompatibility for the co-delivery of diverse immunotherapeutic agents. Moreover, their inherent capacity to traverse the BBB and home in on GBM holds promise for augmenting the efficacy of GBM immunotherapy. Thus, this review begins by revisiting the various thoughts and agents on immunotherapy for GBM. Then, the barriers to successful GBM immunotherapy are analyzed, and the corresponding biomimetic strategies are explored from the perspective of function and structure. Finally, the clinical translation's current state and prospects of biomimetic strategy are addressed. This review aspires to provide fresh perspectives on the advancement of immunotherapy for GBM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomaterials
Biomaterials 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
26.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
565
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Biomaterials is an international journal covering the science and clinical application of biomaterials. A biomaterial is now defined as a substance that has been engineered to take a form which, alone or as part of a complex system, is used to direct, by control of interactions with components of living systems, the course of any therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. It is the aim of the journal to provide a peer-reviewed forum for the publication of original papers and authoritative review and opinion papers dealing with the most important issues facing the use of biomaterials in clinical practice. The scope of the journal covers the wide range of physical, biological and chemical sciences that underpin the design of biomaterials and the clinical disciplines in which they are used. These sciences include polymer synthesis and characterization, drug and gene vector design, the biology of the host response, immunology and toxicology and self assembly at the nanoscale. Clinical applications include the therapies of medical technology and regenerative medicine in all clinical disciplines, and diagnostic systems that reply on innovative contrast and sensing agents. The journal is relevant to areas such as cancer diagnosis and therapy, implantable devices, drug delivery systems, gene vectors, bionanotechnology and tissue engineering.
期刊最新文献
Advanced nano delivery system for stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's disease. Corrigendum to 'Engineered cell-laden human protein-based elastomer' [34(2013), 5496-5505]. Biomaterials for reliable wearable health monitoring: Applications in skin and eye integration. Macrophage microRNA-146a is a central regulator of the foreign body response to biomaterial implants. Precise modulation of cell activity using sono-responsive nano-transducers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1