评估肥胖症的恶病质:矛盾还是完全可能?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1097/MCO.0000000000001054
Vickie E Baracos
{"title":"评估肥胖症的恶病质:矛盾还是完全可能?","authors":"Vickie E Baracos","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss in patients with cancer do not specifically address weight loss in patients who are obese at presentation. This review explores the clinical impact of weight loss and depletion of the skeletal muscle mass (i.e., criteria defining cancer cachexia), in patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Overweight and obese BMI values are shown by many recent studies to pose a survival advantage in patients with cancers of advanced stage, when compared with BMI in normal and underweight ranges. The classification of cancer-associated weight loss has evolved, and current grading schemes evaluate the impact of weight across the range of BMI values. Weight loss is associated with mortality in patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 , however this is to a much lesser degree than in patients with lower BMI values. Diagnostic imaging permits the precise assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with cancer, and it has been clearly shown that while usually quite muscular, obese patients can have profound muscle depletion (i.e., sarcopenia), independent of the presence of weight loss. Muscle depletion associates strongly with mortality in obese patients, as well as with complications of cancer surgery and systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It would seem contradictory to diagnose concurrent obesity and cachexia, as these terms represent opposite ends of the weight spectrum. Weight loss can occur in anyone with cancer, however its priority for clinical management may be lesser in obese versus low body weight individuals. Sarcopenic obesity is strongly associated with a poor clinical outcome and deserves further research, diagnosis in clinical practice, and new strategies for mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing cachexia in obesity: contradiction or perfectly possible?\",\"authors\":\"Vickie E Baracos\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss in patients with cancer do not specifically address weight loss in patients who are obese at presentation. This review explores the clinical impact of weight loss and depletion of the skeletal muscle mass (i.e., criteria defining cancer cachexia), in patients with obesity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Overweight and obese BMI values are shown by many recent studies to pose a survival advantage in patients with cancers of advanced stage, when compared with BMI in normal and underweight ranges. The classification of cancer-associated weight loss has evolved, and current grading schemes evaluate the impact of weight across the range of BMI values. Weight loss is associated with mortality in patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 , however this is to a much lesser degree than in patients with lower BMI values. Diagnostic imaging permits the precise assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with cancer, and it has been clearly shown that while usually quite muscular, obese patients can have profound muscle depletion (i.e., sarcopenia), independent of the presence of weight loss. Muscle depletion associates strongly with mortality in obese patients, as well as with complications of cancer surgery and systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>It would seem contradictory to diagnose concurrent obesity and cachexia, as these terms represent opposite ends of the weight spectrum. Weight loss can occur in anyone with cancer, however its priority for clinical management may be lesser in obese versus low body weight individuals. Sarcopenic obesity is strongly associated with a poor clinical outcome and deserves further research, diagnosis in clinical practice, and new strategies for mitigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:现有的癌症患者临床重要体重减轻的定义并没有专门针对发病时肥胖的患者的体重减轻。本综述探讨了肥胖患者体重减轻和骨骼肌质量耗竭(即癌症恶病质的定义标准)的临床影响:最近的研究结果表明,与体重正常和体重不足的 BMI 值相比,超重和肥胖的 BMI 值对晚期癌症患者的生存具有优势。癌症相关体重减轻的分级方法也在不断发展,目前的分级方案可评估体重在不同 BMI 值范围内的影响。体重指数超过 30 kg/m2 的患者体重减轻与死亡率有关,但其程度远低于体重指数值较低的患者。诊断成像可以对癌症患者的骨骼肌指数(SMI)进行精确评估,而且已经清楚地表明,尽管肥胖患者通常肌肉发达,但他们的肌肉也会严重萎缩(即肌肉疏松症),与体重减轻无关。肌肉消耗与肥胖患者的死亡率以及癌症手术和系统治疗的并发症密切相关。小结:诊断并发肥胖症和恶病质似乎是矛盾的,因为这两个术语代表了体重谱的两端。任何癌症患者都可能出现体重减轻,但肥胖者与低体重者相比,体重减轻在临床管理中的优先级可能要低一些。肌肉萎缩性肥胖与不良的临床预后密切相关,值得进一步研究、在临床实践中进行诊断并制定新的缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing cachexia in obesity: contradiction or perfectly possible?

Purpose of review: Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss in patients with cancer do not specifically address weight loss in patients who are obese at presentation. This review explores the clinical impact of weight loss and depletion of the skeletal muscle mass (i.e., criteria defining cancer cachexia), in patients with obesity.

Recent findings: Overweight and obese BMI values are shown by many recent studies to pose a survival advantage in patients with cancers of advanced stage, when compared with BMI in normal and underweight ranges. The classification of cancer-associated weight loss has evolved, and current grading schemes evaluate the impact of weight across the range of BMI values. Weight loss is associated with mortality in patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 , however this is to a much lesser degree than in patients with lower BMI values. Diagnostic imaging permits the precise assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with cancer, and it has been clearly shown that while usually quite muscular, obese patients can have profound muscle depletion (i.e., sarcopenia), independent of the presence of weight loss. Muscle depletion associates strongly with mortality in obese patients, as well as with complications of cancer surgery and systemic therapy.

Summary: It would seem contradictory to diagnose concurrent obesity and cachexia, as these terms represent opposite ends of the weight spectrum. Weight loss can occur in anyone with cancer, however its priority for clinical management may be lesser in obese versus low body weight individuals. Sarcopenic obesity is strongly associated with a poor clinical outcome and deserves further research, diagnosis in clinical practice, and new strategies for mitigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
期刊最新文献
Dietary protein in the ICU in relation to health outcomes. Energy balance and obesity: the emerging role of glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation and neuromuscular function in older adults. Progress in physiologically based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models of amino acids in humans. Nutrition in pediatric end-stage liver disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1